Attorney-general Forwards People Power Dissolution Case To Court

What a sham this is, Feudalism is alive and strong in Thailand.
How can any committee up hold a constitution that was only voted in by 30% of the Thai people.
The Coup makers constitution, who amended a constitution to save their own back sides
a constitution that was created in a democratic manner and agreed by the people of thailand freely in 1997 and not the one created 2 yrs ago under military rule.

The noose should be around PAD leaders neck, who are continuously depressing the poor.
Protectionist feudal lords who do not want the working class to benefit from the fruits of Thailand

What a sham this is, Feudalism is alive and strong in Thailand.
How can any committee up hold a constitution that was only voted in by 30% of the Thai people.
The Coup makers constitution, who amended a constitution to save their own back sides
a constitution that was created in a democratic manner and agreed by the people of thailand freely in 1997 and not the one created 2 yrs ago under military rule.

The noose should be around PAD leaders neck, who are continuously depressing the poor.
Protectionist feudal lords who do not want the working class to benefit from the fruits of Thailand

Democrats Suggest Anti-graft Commission Probe Dispersal of PAD

UPDATE : 10 October 2008

The opposition party has proposed that the National Counter Corruption Commission probe Tuesday's violent clashes between anti-government supporters and the police. Meanwhile, the government's policy declaration may be invalid due to a suspicious meeting quorum.

Opposition Whip Chief, Sathit Wongnongtoey and core leaders of the Democrat Party have proposed that the National Counter Corruption Commission should be appointed to investigate the use of tear gas on October 7th by police to disperse demonstrators of the People's Alliance for Democracy in front of Parliament.

Sathit said an independent agency like the NCCC should have more credibility than a committee set up by Cabinet. Furthermore, the organisation has direct authority to examine state officials. The opposition will submit the proposition to the NCCC this afternoon.

He also revealed that the Democrat Party has questioned the meeting quorum for Tuesday's government policy declaration because there are certain MPs belonging to the coalition parties who cast votes for the policy though they did not attend the session, including Chalerm Yoobamrung, Sarit Ung-apinan, and Manit Nopamornbodee.

Sathit said the meeting could be declared invalid and unlawful. The Democrats will lodge the issue with the Constitution Court for further interpretation, and the prime minister could be dismissed if found guilty.

The opposition whip chief said the claim by the government that the meeting to deliver the policy statement could not be prolonged is unreasonable because Cabinet can declare its policy until October 9th. He said the government's action can be considered an attempt to conceal its responsibility for carrying out violence against the public.

Source: TOC

In conjunction with the PPP Dissolution Case, the following report is maybe interesting


If you take a look at the beginning of that meeting, there was a lot MP's and Senators who din't came and the House Speaker had postponed the meeting at that morning a a later time. May the required amount of MP's and Senators was just reached with those missing persons and the question is: WHO had cast the votes for that guy's?

Interesting here is that the "famous" Chalerm Yoobamrung is one of that persons!

Cheers.

In conjunction with the PPP Dissolution Case, the following report is maybe interesting


If you take a look at the beginning of that meeting, there was a lot MP's and Senators who din't came and the House Speaker had postponed the meeting at that morning a a later time. May the required amount of MP's and Senators was just reached with those missing persons and the question is: WHO had cast the votes for that guy's?

Interesting here is that the "famous" Chalerm Yoobamrung is one of that persons!

Cheers.

What a sham this is, Feudalism is alive and strong in Thailand.
How can any committee up hold a constitution that was only voted in by 30% of the Thai people.
The Coup makers constitution, who amended a constitution to save their own back sides
a constitution that was created in a democratic manner and agreed by the people of thailand freely in 1997 and not the one created 2 yrs ago under military rule.

The noose should be around PAD leaders neck, who are continuously depressing the poor.
Protectionist feudal lords who do not want the working class to benefit from the fruits of Thailand

Do I understand the text right with my humble english knowledge?
Some MPs vote even they were not in the parliament?
in my humble opinion if true that's not a small thing. But maybe there are no laws because no one ever thought of such things??

The only benefits that the working class get are the baht from selling their votes. If only the guy that you worship would decide that he has got enough money now and concentrate his efforts for the good of the people..country.. then well you don't need me to say anymore do you!

Thinking about the a 30% figure, it must be at least that amount of the population who sell their vote. That is your democracy..that is one man one vote. Have a nice day.