Jump to content

Listen to Pattaya FM105

View New Content  

Everything You Wanted To Know About Usufruct Agreements In Thailand


124 replies to this topic

#101 MaiChai

MaiChai

    Goo bpen jai yen

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,911 posts

Posted 2008-04-02 11:23:38

Issanlawyers, here is my question: I have lived in Thailand a long time and will eventually divorce my Thai wife. Lets just say we have had alot of problems over the years, mostly due to her doing things without telling me, and then me having to deal with the legal consequences (gambling, etc). Thus I don't want to put my 'Thai future' legally in the hands of another Thai, and thus want my own independence to buy some land and build a small house and do this under my own control. I have children with my wife and I am on good terms with my wife. We currently have several court cases complete and a new case by myself regarding a third party (the gambling den) trying to strip my wife of her assets (which are really mine since I provided the money). My new court case is to prove that I provided the funds for our house/car and I was not aware of my wifes actions; if we can prove this then the third party don't have the right to 100% of the assets (currently seized by the court).

I asked my lawyer if I could buy land under my childrens name (daughter is 8) and then do a usufruct to give me control of the land until I die. Then my daughter would get back control (its my intention to leave my estate to my children anyway). I would buy some land in an area where my wife's family dont reside and there  are a number of farangs for friends and there are reasonable facilities (good transport, 7/11, ADSL, Big C, a national park, but still in the country; also I already have some Thai friends in this area). My lawyer called the land dept and they said that the money for buying the land would have to come from my wife and not from me. But in theory I could give the money for the land as a gift to my daughter and then it would be her money to buy the land? My concerns would be if my wife could interfere, and thus get control of the land (even if a usufruct is in place?). The concept of this is to provide an alternative family home for my children without interference or control from my wife or another Thai, which I can enjoy into my retirement. I am sure my wife would respect my wishes regarding this usufruct, but anyone can change their mind and get nasty? My lawyer advises that selling of land owned by children under legal age has to be approved by the court.

The intention is to divorce my wife once the current court cases are settled (this is my lawyers advice). My lawyers usufruct knowledge seems a little weak, hence why I am asking you.

Your advice would be much appreciated. Many thanks in advance.

#102 mako

mako

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 2009-06-09 06:09:07

Hi All
      Does anyone know where I can find info on "Usufructs" in Thai language so my wife can read and understand exactly what they are.
Thanks Barry

#103 Harbour

Harbour

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 2009-06-10 00:58:07

View PostRazr, on 2008-03-18 02:12:31, said:

View PostBigSnake, on 2008-03-18 15:06:22, said:

Need a Lawyer. :D  :D  :D

Who needs one, and why? :)

I need a lawyer and here is the why - (I may just need a beer and a bottle of whiskey instead) Ok found some land online did the checking and confirmed everything made an agreement with the guy  my wife called his everything is set for us to go look at the land and then a few days before I can get back into country he sends an email and says he is going to have to double the price. Can he do that after we had an agreement and the price is double what he advertized it at. Is thaere not a law against false advertments here. I have several emails where the price was confirmed.

#104 donx

donx

    Super Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,026 posts

Posted 2009-06-10 03:19:56

View PostHarbour, on 2009-06-09 13:58:07, said:

View PostRazr, on 2008-03-18 02:12:31, said:

View PostBigSnake, on 2008-03-18 15:06:22, said:

Need a Lawyer. :D  :D  :D

Who needs one, and why? :)

I need a lawyer and here is the why - (I may just need a beer and a bottle of whiskey instead) Ok found some land online did the checking and confirmed everything made an agreement with the guy  my wife called his everything is set for us to go look at the land and then a few days before I can get back into country he sends an email and says he is going to have to double the price. Can he do that after we had an agreement and the price is double what he advertized it at. Is thaere not a law against false advertments here. I have several emails where the price was confirmed.
If no agreement was signed and no deposit provided with the agreement, then I don't think there is much to be done. I have heard this often happens. Either he believes you want the land enough to pay double or he doesn't want to sell it. Either way, without a signed agreement in place, you either agree to the new price or walk away.

My wife was fortunate that we had her brother sign an agreement and make a down payment on some land we wanted to buy. The agreement was made in April (2007) and we had until the end of June to come up with the balance and meet the seller at the land office. The day of the transfer, the seller told us he hoped we didn't show up because he had someone willing to pay 25% more for the land. Fortunately for us we had made the down payment and the sale was finalized near the end of June.

#105 surayu

surayu

    Same Same, Up To You

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,013 posts

Posted 2009-06-19 20:42:35

Hello everyones! i got a few questions that i would be very gratefull if someone can answer them, i am about to register a usufruct on a piece of land the relative of my wife are willing to give to me(free), i included a scan of the land title as i have no idea if this is a chanote or whatever else....

1) How can i make sure is registered for "life" and not just 30 years?

2) Do i have to keep this little piece of document or a new one(the yellow book?) will be produced by the Land Office just in my name? and will the relative been holding any sort of documents at all? (maybe this one)

3) If i build anything on it will i be able to rent/sell it as i wish, without any required necessary action by the owner of the land (my wifes relatives) ?

any suggestions, good or bad are appreciated, thanks in advance!    :)     :D


Attached File  Land.JPG   374.59K   18 downloads





Reason for Edit: i forgot to add the scan :D here it is now.

Edited by surayu, 2009-06-19 20:45:34.


#106 Lannatyne

Lannatyne

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 371 posts

Posted 2009-08-06 19:38:43

View PostIsaanlawyers, on 2008-02-25 11:57:49, said:

I wrote the following text in the last 24 hours after reading a thread about lease agreements.
Sorry about the grammar if it isn't perfect English and if I forgot to mention few things.
===========================================================================

Everything you wanted to know about
usufructs in Thailand.

By Sebastian H. Brousseau, LLB, B.Sc.
Attorney-at-Law (Quebec, Canada)
Managing director of Isaan Lawyers.

==========================
Isaan Lawyers has recently registered usufruct agreements in more than 15 provinces of Thailand. The following text is aimed to give you objective and accurate information about this right included in the Civil and Commercial Code of Thailand (hereafter CCCT). Don't hesitate to communicate with us by email should you have any questions or inquiries.
==========================

As you probably know, foreigners are forbidden to own land in Thailand by the Land Code. There are few rare exceptions to this rule (investment of 40 million baht, BOI approval, etc.). This is why many foreigners are looking into ways to secure a real estate investment or at least, give them the right to enjoy a property even if they are not the "full" owner. A usufruct agreement can give you this right: to possess and enjoy a property without being the full owner. And it is perfectly legal.

HISTORY

A usufruct is a real right (real means in civil law = attached to a thing) that originates from Roman law. In Roman law, the wife wasn't entering legally in the family of her husband. At the death of her husband, the wife had no rights of inheritance in the estate. To bypass this injustice, Roman law created the right of "usufruct". This usufruct was giving the widow the possibility to enjoy the asset of her husband after his death even if she wasn't an heir. The asset was normally devolved to the children at that time.

By essence, the right of usufruct is temporary and has roots in family relationships.

WHAT IS A USUFRUCT AGREEMENT

Usufruct contracts are governed by sections 1417 to 1428 of the CCCT. A usufruct is a right granted by the owner(s) of the land/house in favor of a usufructuary whereby this person has the right to possess, use and enjoy the benefits of an immovable property (section 1417 CCCT). The usufructuary has the right to manage the property (sect 1414 CCCT). It can be on a piece of land, on a house or on both of them.

The holder of a usufruct, known as "usufructury", has the right to use, possess and enjoy the property, as well as the right to receive profits from the fruits of the property. The usufructuary could be a person or an entity (ex: a company).

In civil law, property is divided in three parts. They are called in latin "usus" (use), "fructus" (fruits) and "abusus" (abuse). The word usufruct is normally unknown in Commonwealth countries. It combines the two first parts of the property in civil law, the usus (use, or possession) and fructus (fruits, or as we will see, more or less the "profits"). In French, it is called "usufruit" and in Thai "See-tee-kep-kin". It is interesting and useful to know that Thai Civil Law was largely inspired by French Civil law. (see "the work of codification in Siam" by Rene Guyon, 1919.)

The owner who gives the usufruct is called in French "nu-propriétaire" or by literal translation in English "naked-owner". It means that the owner has nothing else than the ownership: He can't use his possession, even if he is the owner. Beside possession and enjoyment of the property, the usufructurary has also the legal right to use and derive benefits from the property that belongs to another person, as long as the property is not damaged. "Fruits" should be understood as its natural (fruits, livestock, etc) and/or its legal definition (rent, etc.).

If you would like to use this right for industrial purposes, be aware that some taxes might be required.

Let's see some examples of usufruct agreements.

EXAMPLES

Imagine that you have a usufruct on a piece of land, an orchard. The apples (natural fruits) will be your asset and do not belong to the 'real" owner of the land. But in our days, fruits are more or less the legal fruits, like a rent from a lease. Section 148 of CCCT defines what can be the legal fruits in Thailand: "legal fruits denote a thing or interest obtained periodically by the owner from another person for the use of the thing; It is calculated and may be acquired day by day or according to a period of time fixed."

Now imagine that you have a Thai girlfriend. She buys the land and gives you a usufruct on this land for free. It means that you can enjoy this property, even ask her to leave the property, can sublease and get the money from the rents, and this, until the end of your life. It is NOT restricted to 30 years maximum. On top of that, if you decide to build on this land, it is possible for you be the full owner of the buildings and constructions. It is really a strong right.

THE END OF A USUFRUCT CONTRACT

In Thailand, a usufruct can be created for a limited time (5 years, 10 years, etc.) or the LIFE of the usufructuary. (sect. 1418 CCCT). If no time has been fixed, it is presumed that the usufruct is for the life of the usufructuary. In any case, the usufruct ends at the death of the usufructuary.

THE USUFRUCTUARY CAN LEASE THE LAND/HOUSE

A usufructuary has the right to enjoy, use and possess the land. He is acting like the real owner but can not sell or destroy the property as he is NOT the full owner. However, he can transfer his rights on the land/house to a third party. Even if the usufruct will end at the death of the usufructuary the usufructuary can lease out the land to a third party and this second agreement will NOT end when the usufructuary will die as per the Supreme Court ruling 2297/1998: "the lessor does not have to be the owner of the property".

So the usufructuary can grant a thirty years lease to a third party. By this way, you could pass on your rights to your children or other relatives even after death if the lease was done before the demise. Do not forget that all leases over 3 years must be registered at the land department and taxes have to be paid.

REGISTRATION

By a decision of the Supreme Court of Thailand, all usufruct agreements must be registered to be valid (Supreme Court decision 6872/2539). Once you register a usufruct at the land department where the title deed is located, your name will be registered (written in Thai) on the title deed. After this registration, the land/house can only be sold provided the buyer respects this usufruct. This is why it will be difficult for the owner to sell the land/house after a usufruct is register: nobody wants to buy a property where they can't live. Be aware land departments in Thailand have different rules and requirements. Some will ask to see your visa, some will ask for the father and mother's name of the usufructuary, etc.

You can also get a yellow book which is a House Registration Certificate (Thor. Ror 13) with a usufruct but many other documents will be required.

MYTHS AND FACTS ABOUT USUFRUCT AGREEMENTS

1) Usufruct can be done for maximum 1 rai

False. We registered usufruct agreements for more than 100 rai with one contract and multiple title deeds. Hovewer, the usufruct must be registered on EACH title deed separately.

2) Usufruct have never been tested by the Court

False, there are Court decisions IN THAILAND about usufructs (examples: Supreme Court of Thailand 2783/2516, 6872/2539, 2297/2541, 2380/2542, etc.). The land department has also published a small guideline about usufruct agreements.

Usufructs originate from Roman Law and they have been known in civil law countries for centuries. It has nothing to do with some old agricultural laws or customs. Remember that leases where mostly used in the 18th and 19th centuries by farmers as they were not rich enough to fully buy land.

3) Usufructs are NOT as safe as lease agreements:

False. There is no legal, historical or factual grounds for this affirmation. If a lease is safe in Thailand (section 537 and following), a usufruct is safe. Both of them are in the CCCT, just as a gift agreement (section 453 and following) or a loan contract (section 640 and following).

Unless the Thai law changes, foreigners are fully allowed to make usufruct agreements, just as they are allowed to purchase condominiums or to make a lease agreement. Some law firms prefer to register lease agreements as leases agreements are normally more expensive. If you can understand civil law, there is even some legal basis to say that a usufruct is stronger than a lease agreement.

4) You must pay taxes to register a usufruct agreement

True. If the usufruct agreement is done for an amount of money, taxes of about 1.5 % on the value of the contract will have to be paid. Some land departments don't like to register usufruct agreements for free as they see that their government is not making as much money as a lease agreement. On a lease agreement, you will also have to pay taxes on the value of the rents for the total agreement. Rents must be based on the assessed value of the property. Most of the time, it is cheaper to register a usufruct agreement than a lease agreement. If you register a usufruct agreement involving a company, the land department might ask for some value on the contract. They won't like to see it done for free. It is the discretion of the land officers to accept an agreement even if by law, it is clear and usufruct agreements for free CAN be done.

5) The owner can't borrow money or sell its property if a usufruct is registered

False. Even if you register a usufruct agreement on a title deed, the owner can sell his property to anyone. But in reality, nobody is interested to buy a property where they will have to maintain your right and won't be able to use this property until you die. This is why a usufruct is a good protection for you as it allows you to live there for the rest of your life, whatever happens. If you want this right to be passed to your heirs, it can also be done by a lease agreement might be a better option depending on your case.

6) It is possible to cancel or void a usufruct agreement

If you are NOT married to the owner granting you the usufruct, we believe it is not possible to cancel a usufruct and you are legally protected.

If you are legally married to the owner, Thai lawyers disagree on the application of article 1469 CCCT. This article mentions that all agreements made between spouses can be cancelled by the Court at the request of one party, unless agreements affect third parties. According to one interpretation, "publicity" or registration affect third parties and a usufruct can't be cancelled. According to the other interpretation, we have to search for the spirit of the law and it looks like Thai law wanted to end all relations between spouses in case of divorce, even usufruct agreements. A way to avoid the application of 1469 CCCT would be to have a second agreement (like a lease) affecting a third party before the Court could cancel your usufruct agreement.

7) I will be fully protected with a usufruct

False. Imagine that you bought a big house in a small village near the family of your girlfriend. Now, imagine that things go wrong with her and you decide to expulse her from this house. You have the legal right to do it. But do you really think your life will be nice and quiet near her family, in a big house, in the middle of nowhere? Usufruct will legally protect you but there are situations where even a legal protection won't have any authority in face of the reality.

8) Usufruct agreements can be done anywhere in Thailand

False. Usufruct agreements must be registered and you can register a lease or a usufruct only on title deeds equals or superior to Nor Sor Sam. It means that usufruct can be registered for Chanotte or Nor Sor Sam, but can NOT be registered in some rural areas without proper title deeds.

9) A usufruct agreement is a simple form.

False. It is a contract, like a loan or a lease. All contracts can be adapted or constructed around the situations of the parties. For example, some clients prefer limitations to their usufruct right for their own and personal use. However, others want to be able to transfer their rights without any prior notice or notifications (see section 1422 CCCT). Some usufructs are done for free, some for an amount of money. All clauses are possible if they are not against public order.

===========================

Usufruct agreements are a strong protection as they let you possess, use and manage a property in Thailand. We believe they will give you some piece of mind while you enjoy all the other aspects of Thailand. They can be a very good alternative to lease agreements, as they can be for your lifetime, with lesser taxes. Don't hesitate to consult a lawyer if you want to know your best options according to your needs and your personal situation.

===========================



DISPOSITIONS OF THE CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL

CODE OF THAILAND


TITLE VII: USUFRUCT


Section 1417
An immovable property may be subjected to a usufruct by virtue of which the usufructuary is entitled to the possession, use and enjoyment of the property.

He has the right of management of the property.


The usufruct of a forest, mine or quarry entitles the usufructuary to the exploitation of the forest, mine or quary.


Section 1418
A usufruct may be created either for a period of time or for the life of the usufructary.

If no time has been fixed, it is presumed that the usufruct is for the life of the usfructuary.


If it is created for a period of time, the provisions of Section 1403 paragraph 3 shall apply mutatis mutandis.

In any case the usufuct comes to an end on the death of the usufructuary.

Section 1419
If property is destroyed without compensation being paid, the owner is not bound to restore it; but, if he does so to any extent, the usufruct revives to that extent.

If any compensation is paid, the owner or the usufructary must restore the property so far as it is possible to do so, having regard to the amount of the compensation received, and the usufruct revives to that extent; but, if restoration is impossible, the usufruct comes to an end and the compensation must be divided between the owner and the usufructary in proportion to the damages suffered by the respectively.

The same rules apply mutatis mutandis in the case of expropriation as well as in the case of partial destruction of the property or of partial impossibility to restore the property.

Section 1420
When the usufruct comes to an end, the usufructuary must return the property to the owner.

The usufructuary is liable for the destruction or depreciation in value of the property, unless he proves that the damage was not the cause of his own fault.

He must replace anything which he has wrongfully consumed.


He is not bound to give compensation for depreciation in value caused by reasonable use.

Section 1421
The usufructary must, in the exercise of his rights, take as much care of the property as a person of ordinary prudence would take of his own property.

Section 1422

Unless otherwise provided in the act creating the usufruct, the usufructary may transfer the exercise of his right to a third person. In such case, the owner of the property may sue the transferee directly.

Section 1423
The owner may object to any unlawful or unreasonable use of the property.

If the owner proves that his rights are in peril, he may demand security from the usufructary; except in the case of a donor who has reserved to himself the usufruct of the property given.


If the usufructary fails to give security within a reasonable time fixed for the purpose, or if, in spite of the owner's objection, he continues to make use of the property unlawfully or unreasonably, the Court may appoint a Receiver to manage the property in his stead. Upon security being given, the Court may release the Receiver so appointed.

Section 1424
The usufructary is bound to keep the substance of the property unaltered, and is responsible for ordinary maintenance and petty repairs.

If important repairs or measures are necessary for the preservation of the property, the usufructuary must forthwith inform the owner thereof and permit them to be carried out. In case of default by the owner, the usufructuary may have the work carried out at the owner's expense.

Section 1425
All extraordinary expenses must be borne by the owner, but in order to meet these or expenses coming under the foregoing section he may realize part of the property unless the usufructuary is willing to advance the necessary funds without charging interest.

Section 1426
The usufructary shall, for the duration of the usufruct, bear expenses for the management of the property, pay taxes and duties, and be responsible for interest payable on debts charged upon it.

Section 1427
If required by the owner, the usufructuary is bound to insure the property against loss for the benefit of the owner; and if the property is already insured, he is bound to renew such insurance when due.

He must pay the premiums of the insurance for the duration of his usufruct.

Section 1428
No action by the owner against the usufructuary or his transferee in connection with the usufruct or vice versa may be entered later than 1 year after the usufruct comes to an end; but in any action by the owner who could not have known of the end of the usufruct, the prescription of 1 year shall run from the time when he knew or ought to have know of it.




Hello,

Great article!

Our own lawyer is away in Europe on holiday at the moment, and I have a question. Can someone help?

My wife is Thai, and our land / house was originally bought in my mother-in-laws name. Mum-in-law gave me a lifetime usufruct, and after that was registered, a transfer by way of gift was made to my wife.

So, title is in my wife's name, but the usufruct was given prior to her getting title.

Quite simply, we want to sell the property. Or, if needed, 30-yr lease it to a 'purchaser'.

Can I, as usufructuary, simply renounce / cancel my usufruct, so that title is unencumbered for the prospective purchaser? How do I do this?

#107 Gary A

Gary A

    Titanium Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,977 posts

Posted 2009-08-08 08:59:16

So you have a relationship that has gone bad. Since a divorce would upset some legal contracts you have set up to protect yourself, you refuse to give your wife a divorce. Keep in mind that if you are dead, she needs no divorce. Likewise contracts that terminate upon your death. Your usufruct certainly does you no good if you are dead. Drastic? Think about it. People have died for a lot less than possession of a house.

Long ago I decided that it is easier and safer to simply put everything in my wife's name. I pay no taxes, no lawyer fees and other than signing a paper that says I have no financial interest in my WIFE'S property no other legal crap. If worse comes to worse, I put my things in the back of MY pickup truck and drive off into the sunset.

#108 Lannatyne

Lannatyne

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 371 posts

Posted 2009-08-08 19:49:52

View PostGary A, on 2009-08-08 08:59:16, said:

So you have a relationship that has gone bad. Since a divorce would upset some legal contracts you have set up to protect yourself, you refuse to give your wife a divorce. Keep in mind that if you are dead, she needs no divorce. Likewise contracts that terminate upon your death. Your usufruct certainly does you no good if you are dead. Drastic? Think about it. People have died for a lot less than possession of a house.

Long ago I decided that it is easier and safer to simply put everything in my wife's name. I pay no taxes, no lawyer fees and other than signing a paper that says I have no financial interest in my WIFE'S property no other legal crap. If worse comes to worse, I put my things in the back of MY pickup truck and drive off into the sunset.

Sorry, but are you replying to my previous query, or someone elses?

In my case, nothing whatsoever has gone bad, and I never suggested that in my posting. We just want to sell the property and move somewhere bigger.

#109 choppychugger

choppychugger

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 401 posts

Posted 2009-08-08 20:45:33

Great post - Have read through everything and need some advice as my case doesnt seem to be in amongst all the posts.

* Am not married been with partner for 5 years - Me 29 yrs Her 27 years 3 yr old son together

* Recently borrowed money from SCB me as garuntor for partner to purchase a house - House/land is in wifes name


Is it easy enough to get the usufruct now even though we have done the deal with the bank and registered the house in her name?

Where do I stand legelly in my present situation if :
1. The death of my partner ?
2. We split up?

3. We arent planning on getting married, is that better or not with regards to the usufruct?

I guess my main worry is protecting the house in the event that something happens to my partner.

Thanks in advance,

Choppy

#110 stgrhe

stgrhe

    Super Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,290 posts

Posted 2009-08-09 07:38:46

View Postchoppychugger, on 2009-08-08 20:45:33, said:

Great post - Have read through everything and need some advice as my case doesnt seem to be in amongst all the posts.

* Am not married been with partner for 5 years - Me 29 yrs Her 27 years 3 yr old son together

* Recently borrowed money from SCB me as garuntor for partner to purchase a house - House/land is in wifes name


Is it easy enough to get the usufruct now even though we have done the deal with the bank and registered the house in her name?

Where do I stand legelly in my present situation if :
1. The death of my partner ?
2. We split up?

3. We arent planning on getting married, is that better or not with regards to the usufruct?

I guess my main worry is protecting the house in the event that something happens to my partner.

Thanks in advance,

Choppy

Whether it is easy or not depends entirely on the location. There are some land offices, Ban Chang for instance, that is reportedly refusing to register any usufructs while in many areas it goes very smoothly. Then again in some areas you would expected to pass on a fairly hefty sum of tea money to get it through. In paid 75 baht for mine in Pranburi whereas the 'going rate' in Hua Hin is said to be 15,000 baht.

Once the usufruct is registered on the land title you have possession rights over the land until you pass; this whether or not your partner dies before you or you split up. In the event of the latter your partner will have no rights what so ever to enter the property, and you could even lease the property to someone else if you wish.

The other side to the coin is, and here is a bit of a warning, if the land is in you girlfriend's village there might be other serious complications if you understand what I mean.

#111 Gary A

Gary A

    Titanium Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,977 posts

Posted 2009-08-09 09:37:41

View PostLannatyne, on 2009-08-08 19:49:52, said:

View PostGary A, on 2009-08-08 08:59:16, said:

So you have a relationship that has gone bad. Since a divorce would upset some legal contracts you have set up to protect yourself, you refuse to give your wife a divorce. Keep in mind that if you are dead, she needs no divorce. Likewise contracts that terminate upon your death. Your usufruct certainly does you no good if you are dead. Drastic? Think about it. People have died for a lot less than possession of a house.

Long ago I decided that it is easier and safer to simply put everything in my wife's name. I pay no taxes, no lawyer fees and other than signing a paper that says I have no financial interest in my WIFE'S property no other legal crap. If worse comes to worse, I put my things in the back of MY pickup truck and drive off into the sunset.

Sorry, but are you replying to my previous query, or someone elses?

In my case, nothing whatsoever has gone bad, and I never suggested that in my posting. We just want to sell the property and move somewhere bigger.

My comments are simply my opinion regarding all the ways farangs try to protect their financial interests. My post does not refer to any previous post. My main point is that either you trust your wife or you don't.

#112 bangkokrick

bangkokrick

    Remember this member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,525 posts

Posted 2009-08-09 13:21:11

Please can anyone clarify whether the usufruct has to be done at the time of the transfer at the land office or can it be done at any time later.

Thanks,
Rick

#113 jfchandler

jfchandler

    Epicurious Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,023 posts

Posted 2009-08-09 14:54:50

There have been a variety of posts on TV lately with various farangs reporting that Thai banks are refusing to make home loans to Thai GFs with their farang BF as guarantors...

There was a link posted above to an FAQ document on the Bangkok Bank web site about their requirements for home loans. The link previously posted is no longer valid.

But here is a new/valid one.... It appears to say BKK Bank will only accept family members of the applicant (in this case the Thai GF) as guarantors....

So Choppy, what office location of SCB did you deal with for your loan? And what kind of requirements did they have for your to serve as guarantor for your Thai GF partner (non-married)?

I assume you mean the house/land is in your partner's name (not wife), since you're not married.

View Postchoppychugger, on 2009-08-08 20:45:33, said:

* Am not married been with partner for 5 years - Me 29 yrs Her 27 years 3 yr old son together

* Recently borrowed money from SCB me as garuntor for partner to purchase a house - House/land is in wifes name


#114 scotsman

scotsman

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 471 posts

Posted 2009-08-09 15:02:39

View Postchoppychugger, on 2009-08-08 20:45:33, said:

Great post - Have read through everything and need some advice as my case doesnt seem to be in amongst all the posts.

* Am not married been with partner for 5 years - Me 29 yrs Her 27 years 3 yr old son together

* Recently borrowed money from SCB me as garuntor for partner to purchase a house - House/land is in wifes name


Is it easy enough to get the usufruct now even though we have done the deal with the bank and registered the house in her name?

Where do I stand legelly in my present situation if :
1. The death of my partner ?
2. We split up?

3. We arent planning on getting married, is that better or not with regards to the usufruct?

I guess my main worry is protecting the house in the event that something happens to my partner.

Thanks in advance,

Choppy

The problem you may have to setting up a usufruct is that the bank may not let you as they will hold the deeds of the property unless you have given them something else as guarantee for the loan. It is a lot better for you to setup a usufruct before you marry as the contract may be revoked in the case of Divorce if you set it up when married.
1. You will be able to legally live & use the property & land for as long as the usufruct is in force.
2. your partner can sell the property & Land & you can still live & use that property & land so its not easy to sell that is up to you.
3. It does not matter what you do after the usufruct is setup before marriage.

Trusting your wife has nothing to do with setting up a usufruct it is in most cases to protect you from her family in the event of your wife's death but a good written will is also a good thing to have to protect you & Your wife in case of death.
regards
Scotsman

#115 surayu

surayu

    Same Same, Up To You

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,013 posts

Posted 2009-08-09 15:12:55

View Postscotsman, on 2009-08-09 15:02:39, said:

....setup a usufruct before you marry as the contract may be revoked in the case of Divorce if you set it up when married.

Are you totally sure about this? even if the usufruct is registered on the husband name only? :)

#116 Lannatyne

Lannatyne

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 371 posts

Posted 2009-08-09 15:18:27

View Postsurayu, on 2009-08-09 15:12:55, said:

View Postscotsman, on 2009-08-09 15:02:39, said:

....setup a usufruct before you marry as the contract may be revoked in the case of Divorce if you set it up when married.

Are you totally sure about this? even if the usufruct is registered on the husband name only? :)

Absolutely. See Section 1469 of the Thailand Civil and Commercial Code (extracted below):                    'Any agreement concluded between husband and wife during marriage may be avoided by either of them at any time during marriage or within one year from the day of dissolution of marriage; provided that the right of third persons acting in good faith are not affected thereby'.

#117 surayu

surayu

    Same Same, Up To You

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,013 posts

Posted 2009-08-09 15:35:59

View PostLannatyne, on 2009-08-09 15:18:27, said:

Absolutely. See Section 1469 of the Thailand Civil and Commercial Code (extracted below): 'Any agreement concluded between husband and wife during marriage may be avoided by either of them at any time during marriage or within one year from the day of dissolution of marriage; provided that the right of third persons acting in good faith are not affected thereby'.


Thanks for the quick reply, that's a very worrisome point, how would an individual protect himself from this?

#118 choppychugger

choppychugger

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 401 posts

Posted 2009-08-09 15:45:25

View Postjfchandler, on 2009-08-09 15:54:50, said:

There have been a variety of posts on TV lately with various farangs reporting that Thai banks are refusing to make home loans to Thai GFs with their farang BF as guarantors...

There was a link posted above to an FAQ document on the Bangkok Bank web site about their requirements for home loans. The link previously posted is no longer valid.

But here is a new/valid one.... It appears to say BKK Bank will only accept family members of the applicant (in this case the Thai GF) as guarantors....

So Choppy, what office location of SCB did you deal with for your loan? And what kind of requirements did they have for your to serve as guarantor for your Thai GF partner (non-married)?

I assume you mean the house/land is in your partner's name (not wife), since you're not married.

View Postchoppychugger, on 2009-08-08 20:45:33, said:

* Am not married been with partner for 5 years - Me 29 yrs Her 27 years 3 yr old son together

* Recently borrowed money from SCB me as garuntor for partner to purchase a house - House/land is in wifes name


Hi,

Yes the house & land is in my partners name ( not wife yet ), we have been together for about 5 years and have a 3 year old son, I am 29 and she is 27. She hasnt worked for the last 4 years, and has no property or debts in her name previously. I'm on a multiple entry tourist visa, and work overseas. We borrowed 5.5 million towards our house from SCB in Phuket town chaofa road, with me acting as garantor. Setup the monthly payments @ 50,000 thb.  We also borrowed 1.5million form TMB bank in Phuket town, this time the owner of the house acted as garuntor for my partner, I had nothing to do with this one with regards to providing paperwork. Setup monthly payments @ 50,000 thb also. The difference we payed cash to the seller.

Provided from myslef to SCB:

Passport
Birth Cert
6 mths statements from my thai bank account
Employment contract from head office in Singapore
Our sons birth certs,both passports
Proof of our joint bank accounts.

Provided from my partner to SCB

Passport
Tabian baan
Birth Cert
Bank details
Proof of our joint bank account.


I must add that we have known the seller all our time together, and we timed it just before all the banks started tightening there belts with the uncertain global situation.

We were accepted then rubber stamped after we had a full medical at the Bangkok Phuket Hospitol and our international credit check was cleared.


Choppy

#119 Lannatyne

Lannatyne

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 371 posts

Posted 2009-08-09 15:55:00

View Postsurayu, on 2009-08-09 16:35:59, said:

View PostLannatyne, on 2009-08-09 15:18:27, said:

Absolutely. See Section 1469 of the Thailand Civil and Commercial Code (extracted below): 'Any agreement concluded between husband and wife during marriage may be avoided by either of them at any time during marriage or within one year from the day of dissolution of marriage; provided that the right of third persons acting in good faith are not affected thereby'.


Thanks for the quick reply, that's a very worrisome point, how would an individual protect himself from this?

As far as I know, with the situation as described, you can't protect yourself. Be a good husband, I suppose!

Seriously, unless you can transfer the freehold title to someone else, you're a bit stuck. Do you have offspring who you could 'gift' the title to? Not an deal situation for any future transactions in the property, but giving it to your 'minor' would help greatly in your long-term occupation of the property. Use the current Farang nominee threat and Inheritance Tax risks as a lever for your wife, if need.

#120 jfchandler

jfchandler

    Epicurious Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,023 posts

Posted 2009-08-09 16:36:54

Choppy, thanks very much for the clear and detailed reply... I'm looking at the prospect of wanting to do something similar soon (in BKK, not Phuket), so your experience was of great interest.... Congrats on getting your deal through....

Two followups....

1. Do you have any idea, if you went to do the same SCB deal today, whether it would be similarly approved? Meaning, do you think they've changed the rules/closed the door since the time of your application?

2. What kind of income to debt ratios were they looking for for you as the guarantor.... In other words, for an SCB loan with a 50,000 baht per month payment, how much monthly income did they want you to show as a minimum for approval???

Thanks again... very much!!!

#121 surayu

surayu

    Same Same, Up To You

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,013 posts

Posted 2009-08-09 16:36:57

View PostLannatyne, on 2009-08-09 15:55:00, said:

As far as I know, with the situation as described, you can't protect yourself. Be a good husband, I suppose!

Seriously, unless you can transfer the freehold title to someone else, you're a bit stuck. Do you have offspring who you could 'gift' the title to?


No offspring and no intention to have any, i am thinking about using a relative of mine from back home, do they have to be phisically present to be named as a such?

#122 choppychugger

choppychugger

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 401 posts

Posted 2009-08-09 17:00:41

View Postjfchandler, on 2009-08-09 17:36:54, said:

Choppy, thanks very much for the clear and detailed reply... I'm looking at the prospect of wanting to do something similar soon (in BKK, not Phuket), so your experience was of great interest.... Congrats on getting your deal through....

Two followups....

1. Do you have any idea, if you went to do the same SCB deal today, whether it would be similarly approved? Meaning, do you think they've changed the rules/closed the door since the time of your application?

2. What kind of income to debt ratios were they looking for for you as the guarantor.... In other words, for an SCB loan with a 50,000 baht per month payment, how much monthly income did they want you to show as a minimum for approval???

Thanks again... very much!!!


Hi

No problem with the info, and thanks it all went alot smoother than we anticipated.

1. I would'nt say the door is closed, just that it would be more difficult to do today as the banks seemed to have really tightened up. No comment on the rules as I'm not entirely sure what they are with regards to qualifying. It was around November just gone that it all went ahead. Knowing the devleoper/seller aswell as them being on friendly terms with the manager doesnt do any harm also :)

2. I showed monthly take home of 450-550 k thb. Could of got it a bit lower on the payments, but we decided to budget 100k a month for the house - split between the 2 banks.


Choppy

#123 Lannatyne

Lannatyne

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 371 posts

Posted 2009-08-09 18:21:58

View Postsurayu, on 2009-08-09 17:36:57, said:

View PostLannatyne, on 2009-08-09 15:55:00, said:

As far as I know, with the situation as described, you can't protect yourself. Be a good husband, I suppose!

Seriously, unless you can transfer the freehold title to someone else, you're a bit stuck. Do you have offspring who you could 'gift' the title to?


No offspring and no intention to have any, i am thinking about using a relative of mine from back home, do they have to be phisically present to be named as a such?

Strangely enough, you're the second person to ask me this in a week. As my own lawyer is away on holiday, I can't give a definitive answer yet. However, my guess is that either a Power of Attorney would work, or all paperwork could be sent overseas and witnessed at the local Thai consulate / embassy.

The relative would be a good move. Once he or she has the usufruct from your wife, then job's done. It may be a while before I can get an answer on this, so maybe someone else out there can do it?

If I see nothing, will post a response when my lawyer gets back.

#124 stgrhe

stgrhe

    Super Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,290 posts

Posted 2009-08-10 08:03:27

View PostMaiChai, on 2008-04-02 11:23:38, said:

Issanlawyers, here is my question: I have lived in Thailand a long time and will eventually divorce my Thai wife. Lets just say we have had alot of problems over the years, mostly due to her doing things without telling me, and then me having to deal with the legal consequences (gambling, etc). Thus I don't want to put my 'Thai future' legally in the hands of another Thai, and thus want my own independence to buy some land and build a small house and do this under my own control. I have children with my wife and I am on good terms with my wife. We currently have several court cases complete and a new case by myself regarding a third party (the gambling den) trying to strip my wife of her assets (which are really mine since I provided the money). My new court case is to prove that I provided the funds for our house/car and I was not aware of my wifes actions; if we can prove this then the third party don't have the right to 100% of the assets (currently seized by the court).

I asked my lawyer if I could buy land under my childrens name (daughter is 8) and then do a usufruct to give me control of the land until I die. Then my daughter would get back control (its my intention to leave my estate to my children anyway). I would buy some land in an area where my wife's family dont reside and there  are a number of farangs for friends and there are reasonable facilities (good transport, 7/11, ADSL, Big C, a national park, but still in the country; also I already have some Thai friends in this area). My lawyer called the land dept and they said that the money for buying the land would have to come from my wife and not from me. But in theory I could give the money for the land as a gift to my daughter and then it would be her money to buy the land? My concerns would be if my wife could interfere, and thus get control of the land (even if a usufruct is in place?). The concept of this is to provide an alternative family home for my children without interference or control from my wife or another Thai, which I can enjoy into my retirement. I am sure my wife would respect my wishes regarding this usufruct, but anyone can change their mind and get nasty? My lawyer advises that selling of land owned by children under legal age has to be approved by the court.

The intention is to divorce my wife once the current court cases are settled (this is my lawyers advice). My lawyers usufruct knowledge seems a little weak, hence why I am asking you.

Your advice would be much appreciated. Many thanks in advance.

MaiChai,

Your situation appears to be a trick one so I would suggest to you that you go to Korat and discuss the matter with Sebastien and his associates at Isaan Lawyers. They are a very good law firm based on my experience with them and they are also my family lawyer. Given your situation you are unlikely to get the right advice here on the forum.

Good luck mate!

#125 Gary A

Gary A

    Titanium Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,977 posts

Posted 2009-08-10 08:58:03

View Postscotsman, on 2009-08-09 15:02:39, said:

View Postchoppychugger, on 2009-08-08 20:45:33, said:

Great post - Have read through everything and need some advice as my case doesnt seem to be in amongst all the posts.

* Am not married been with partner for 5 years - Me 29 yrs Her 27 years 3 yr old son together

* Recently borrowed money from SCB me as garuntor for partner to purchase a house - House/land is in wifes name


Is it easy enough to get the usufruct now even though we have done the deal with the bank and registered the house in her name?

Where do I stand legelly in my present situation if :
1. The death of my partner ?
2. We split up?

3. We arent planning on getting married, is that better or not with regards to the usufruct?

I guess my main worry is protecting the house in the event that something happens to my partner.

Thanks in advance,

Choppy

The problem you may have to setting up a usufruct is that the bank may not let you as they will hold the deeds of the property unless you have given them something else as guarantee for the loan. It is a lot better for you to setup a usufruct before you marry as the contract may be revoked in the case of Divorce if you set it up when married.
1. You will be able to legally live & use the property & land for as long as the usufruct is in force.
2. your partner can sell the property & Land & you can still live & use that property & land so its not easy to sell that is up to you.
3. It does not matter what you do after the usufruct is setup before marriage.

Trusting your wife has nothing to do with setting up a usufruct it is in most cases to protect you from her family in the event of your wife's death but a good written will is also a good thing to have to protect you & Your wife in case of death.
regards
Scotsman


I enjoy living out in the boonies, BUT, if something were to happen to my wife, no way could I live here alone. Even if our relationship were to go bad and I had the right to make her leave, no way would I stay here. Without my wife, I'd be headed back to the farang ghettos.



 


Sponsored by ...
Quick Navigation   View New Content Site search: