Don Mueang Airport Will Reloacate To Suvarnabhumi On March 29, 2009DOMESTIC FLIGHTS BACK TO SUVARNABHUMI
|
82 replies to this topic
#1Posted 2009-01-26 18:23:51
Suvarnabhumi Airport ready to receive relocated Don Mueang Airport flights: AoT
SAMUT PRAKAN: -- Suvarnabhumi Airport is ready to take back domestic flights from Don Mueang Airport, according to Airports of Thailand (AoT) acting president Serirat Prasutanont. Mr. Serirat, who is also director of Suvarnabhumi airport, said that the flight relocations will begin March 29 as the national flag carrier, Thai Airways (THAI) has announced it will move all domestic flights now operating from Don Mueang Airport back to Suvarnabhumi Airport on that day. Many airlines have agreed to move their services back to Suvarnabhumi, but some still oppose such a decision by the government, he said. "The AoT will try to persuade and explain them the advantages of the relocation. Suvarnabhumi Airport is not as congested as they think. We can still support more flights," according to the acting AoT president. In the future, Don Mueang Airport will serve only chartered flights and will become an aviation maintenance centre, Mr. Sererat said. Mr. Serirat added that, during the Chinese New Year festival, all flights had fully resumed services at Suvarnabhumi and that the airport now welcomed about 100,000 passengers daily, a figure not much different from what it was before the airport seizure in late November, he said, serving 90,000-110,000 passengers daily. The AoT chief said that an additional 165 flights from 21 local and international airlines have been operating during the Chinese holiday period (January 24-February 5), with about a 7,000 passenger-increase daily. Mr. Serirat, however, admitted that the global economic slowdown has severely affected the chartered flight business, with the number of flights landing during Chinese New Year festival dropping by 50 per cent. He hoped that the situation would gradually recover in the near future. -- TNA 2009-01-26 Related links (Bookmark these!): Thaivisa Travel (Cheap Flights to and from Thailand): http://travel.thaivisa.com BKK On-Line arrival flights info: http://www.thaivisa....k-arrivals.html BKK On-Line departure flights info: http://www.thaivisa....departures.html #2Posted 2009-01-26 18:45:26
Too bad. I really loved the Don Mueang airport, will this relocation means the the property around the Don Mueng area is going down?
#3Posted 2009-01-26 18:49:51
Lets get all the flights back to Swampy and then the red shirts can have a go this time
#4Posted 2009-01-26 18:59:58
Not a very sensible strategy, IMHO. Most big cities have 2 or 3 airports serving them. Why would Bangkok – if it believes that it can become the major regional hub – want to get by with just one? Changi serves Singapore very well, but Singapore is a small place, relatively speaking. So the plan is to spend 100 billion Baht on Swampy phase 2 instead of maybe a few billion Baht upgrading Don Mueang. Of course, the percentage of that 100 billion Baht (or whatever the number is) that will end up in corrupt politicians’ and administrators’ pockets (compared with virtually zero baksheesh from keeping Don Mueang going) will definitely not have swayed this decision.
#5Posted 2009-01-26 19:06:36
The people runnng the aviation show here are probably the biggest bunch of idiots in the history of aviation! Why can't they have two airports like other big cities? But his is what probably comes from rote learning, repetition without the ability to think
#6Posted 2009-01-26 19:11:54
Too bad. I really loved the Don Mueang airport, will this relocation means the the property around the Don Mueng area is going down? yes, property prices to drop for sure since the area is going to be too quiet for the trained, half-deaf THAI ear. Not even some 40k watts karaoke systems can substitute the friendly jet noise #7Posted 2009-01-26 19:19:22
Once again goes to show how business and common sense minded Thai business and government bodies are!
No point to discuss, as you could never teach dog too speak, it will always bark #8Posted 2009-01-26 19:23:56
The people runnng the aviation show here are probably the biggest bunch of idiots in the history of aviation! Why can't they have two airports like other big cities? But his is what probably comes from rote learning, repetition without the ability to think What on earth is the advantage with two airports? It's a waste of time for the passengers and time and money for the airlines. Have you ever had the "privilege" of arriving with an international flight at Suvarnabhumi to be transferred to Don Muang for your inland flight to Chiang Mai or wherever? Not only does it take extra time, but you have to calculate more than you need in case of traffic jams etc. #9Posted 2009-01-26 19:24:50
Ah well,uncertainty & congestion.
Makes a mockery of our Summer bookings...Again ! #10Posted 2009-01-26 19:29:25
Too bad. I really loved the Don Mueang airport, will this relocation means the the property around the Don Mueng area is going down? #11Posted 2009-01-26 19:37:53
A stupid question if i may!
But does this mean that most people will loose their jobs? so say 500-1000 people will be out of work? or will they give them new jobs? Is this being done because of the drop in tourism and just like most other company's worldwide AOT is restructuring to save money? If it is due to drop in profits then may be the government can use the $100 billion that they have in reserves to keep people employed rather then use the money to keep the baht strong. #12Posted 2009-01-26 19:38:21
Maybe so but the runway at DM is tragic if you have ever been up front! The building is rampant with vermin and structural problems (like Swampy). But Swampy has reverted to the old block the exit - and no public member has vision of the gigantic flight boards - levels are now blocked to free movement and like the Old DM airport, you have to go outside to travel between gates. Why bother - stay home and tell the tourist and business people AOT is still hemorrhaging stupidity. Unbelievable - but the move will only frustrate travellers so divided as to a nay or yea.
#13Posted 2009-01-26 19:39:04
Great move BUT why not wait until the infrastructure is complete. ie. Sky rail, Hotels, Motorways, AANNDD --- Effen Security! With BALLS, no more of the "Everyone was having a good time, good food and good music" as one senior cabinet minister put it.
Lets not have the same bullshlt we went through 2 months ago. Edited by bdenner, 2009-01-26 19:43:48. #14Posted 2009-01-26 19:43:01
Lets get all the flights back to Swampy and then the red shirts can have a go this time #15Posted 2009-01-26 19:48:37
The people runnng the aviation show here are probably the biggest bunch of idiots in the history of aviation! Why can't they have two airports like other big cities? But his is what probably comes from rote learning, repetition without the ability to think What on earth is the advantage with two airports? It's a waste of time for the passengers and time and money for the airlines. Have you ever had the "privilege" of arriving with an international flight at Suvarnabhumi to be transferred to Don Muang for your inland flight to Chiang Mai or wherever? Not only does it take extra time, but you have to calculate more than you need in case of traffic jams etc. Totally agree arrive at swampy connect to donmuang to travel country rediculous #16Posted 2009-01-26 19:54:01
The people runnng the aviation show here are probably the biggest bunch of idiots in the history of aviation! Why can't they have two airports like other big cities? But his is what probably comes from rote learning, repetition without the ability to think What on earth is the advantage with two airports? It's a waste of time for the passengers and time and money for the airlines. Have you ever had the "privilege" of arriving with an international flight at Suvarnabhumi to be transferred to Don Muang for your inland flight to Chiang Mai or wherever? Not only does it take extra time, but you have to calculate more than you need in case of traffic jams etc. ...to say nothing of the increased air safety aspects of having neighbouring glide paths. #17Posted 2009-01-26 19:56:43
The people runnng the aviation show here are probably the biggest bunch of idiots in the history of aviation! Why can't they have two airports like other big cities? But his is what probably comes from rote learning, repetition without the ability to think What on earth is the advantage with two airports? It's a waste of time for the passengers and time and money for the airlines. Have you ever had the "privilege" of arriving with an international flight at Suvarnabhumi to be transferred to Don Muang for your inland flight to Chiang Mai or wherever? Not only does it take extra time, but you have to calculate more than you need in case of traffic jams etc. Totally agree arrive at swampy connect to donmuang to travel country rediculous That is part of the stupdity in the first place that they never developed a link between the two airports when there is a railway station right by Don Muang. As I said one of the biggest bunch of idiots in aviation planning history. #18Posted 2009-01-26 19:57:01
What on earth is the advantage with two airports? It's a waste of time for the passengers and time and money for the airlines. Have you ever had the "privilege" of arriving with an international flight at Suvarnabhumi to be transferred to Don Muang for your inland flight to Chiang Mai or wherever? Not only does it take extra time, but you have to calculate more than you need in case of traffic jams etc. #19Posted 2009-01-26 20:07:51
Too bad. I really loved the Don Mueang airport, will this relocation means the the property around the Don Mueng area is going down? Indeed too bad, but it makes you think what the military junta made tick to reopen it. Just plain greed I suppose. #20Posted 2009-01-26 20:08:11
Good or bad?? The "Amari at Don Mueang are offering 1,100 baht everything included... still worth staying there and getting a taxi into town
#22Posted 2009-01-26 20:35:46
What on earth is the advantage with two airports? It's a waste of time for the passengers and time and money for the airlines. Have you ever had the "privilege" of arriving with an international flight at Suvarnabhumi to be transferred to Don Muang for your inland flight to Chiang Mai or wherever? Not only does it take extra time, but you have to calculate more than you need in case of traffic jams etc. #23Posted 2009-01-26 20:47:10
So presumably, this news means an end to the possibility of extending the Skytrain to Don Meuang.............Bugger!!!
#24Posted 2009-01-26 20:47:55
Some of us love D.M. because we can take the bus from up country, get out at the airport and conveniently get on our flight. D.M. is easier and friendlier...I haven't yet flown domestically out of Suwanabhum and probably won't, even if everything is relocated. I also use Don Mueng when I come into Bangkok on business, stay overnight, jump into a van to Future Park, get off at the airport all for 25B for a wuick trip. In the end you have to walk over the bridge which is just part of the adventure.
#25Posted 2009-01-26 21:39:46
Some of us love D.M. because we can take the bus from up country, get out at the airport and conveniently get on our flight. D.M. is easier and friendlier...I haven't yet flown domestically out of Suwanabhum and probably won't, even if everything is relocated. I also use Don Mueng when I come into Bangkok on business, stay overnight, jump into a van to Future Park, get off at the airport all for 25B for a wuick trip. In the end you have to walk over the bridge which is just part of the adventure. Swampy does have a proper bus terminal with free shuttles from the main terminal (express shuttle from departure and arrival floors), with buses to all over Bangkok, including Ekamai and Mo Chit. There's also an excellent van service to Victory Monument for under 30 baht. Swampy is bad, but it won't become better by spreading the traffic between two airports. |
Sponsored by ... |
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














