Jump to content

Listen to Pattaya FM105
View New Content  

Don Mueang Airport Will Reloacate To Suvarnabhumi On March 29, 2009DOMESTIC FLIGHTS BACK TO SUVARNABHUMI


82 replies to this topic

#1 george

    Puyai Baan

  • Root Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29,879 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 18:23:51

Suvarnabhumi Airport ready to receive relocated Don Mueang Airport flights: AoT

SAMUT PRAKAN: -- Suvarnabhumi Airport is ready to take back domestic flights from Don Mueang Airport, according to Airports of Thailand (AoT) acting president Serirat Prasutanont.

Mr. Serirat, who is also director of Suvarnabhumi airport, said that the flight relocations will begin March 29 as the national flag carrier, Thai Airways (THAI) has announced it will move all domestic flights now operating from Don Mueang Airport back to Suvarnabhumi Airport on that day.

Many airlines have agreed to move their services back to Suvarnabhumi, but some still oppose such a decision by the government, he said.

"The AoT will try to persuade and explain them the advantages of the relocation. Suvarnabhumi Airport is not as congested as they think. We can still support more flights," according to the acting AoT president.

In the future, Don Mueang Airport will serve only chartered flights and will become an aviation maintenance centre, Mr. Sererat said.

Mr. Serirat added that, during the Chinese New Year festival, all flights had fully resumed services at Suvarnabhumi and that the airport now welcomed about 100,000 passengers daily, a figure not much different from what it was before the airport seizure in late November, he said, serving 90,000-110,000 passengers daily.

The AoT chief said that an additional 165 flights from 21 local and international airlines have been operating during the Chinese holiday period (January 24-February 5), with about a 7,000 passenger-increase daily.

Mr. Serirat, however, admitted that the global economic slowdown has severely affected the chartered flight business, with the number of flights landing during Chinese New Year festival dropping by 50 per cent.

He hoped that the situation would gradually recover in the near future.

-- TNA 2009-01-26

Related links (Bookmark these!):
Thaivisa Travel (Cheap Flights to and from Thailand): http://travel.thaivisa.com
BKK On-Line arrival flights info: http://www.thaivisa....k-arrivals.html
BKK On-Line departure flights info: http://www.thaivisa....departures.html

#2 bernett

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 18:45:26

Too bad. I really loved the Don Mueang airport, will this relocation means the the property around the Don Mueng area is going down?

#3 99BigLad99

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 178 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 18:49:51

Lets get all the flights back to Swampy and then the red shirts can have a go this time :o

#4 Guderian

    Senior Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 831 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 18:59:58

Not a very sensible strategy, IMHO. Most big cities have 2 or 3 airports serving them. Why would Bangkok – if it believes that it can become the major regional hub – want to get by with just one? Changi serves Singapore very well, but Singapore is a small place, relatively speaking. So the plan is to spend 100 billion Baht on Swampy phase 2 instead of maybe a few billion Baht upgrading Don Mueang. Of course, the percentage of that 100 billion Baht (or whatever the number is) that will end up in corrupt politicians’ and administrators’ pockets (compared with virtually zero baksheesh from keeping Don Mueang going) will definitely not have swayed this decision. :o

#5 marquess

    marquisatal member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,640 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 19:06:36

The people runnng the aviation show here are probably the biggest bunch of idiots in the history of aviation! Why can't they have two airports like other big cities? But his is what probably comes from rote learning, repetition without the ability to think :o

#6 thurien

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 85 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 19:11:54

View Postbernett, on 2009-01-26 18:45:26, said:

Too bad. I really loved the Don Mueang airport, will this relocation means the the property around the Don Mueng area is going down?

yes, property prices to drop for sure since the area is going to be too quiet for the trained, half-deaf THAI ear. Not even some 40k watts karaoke systems can substitute the friendly jet noise

#7 kuffki

    Platinum Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,102 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 19:19:22

Once again goes to show how business and common sense minded Thai business and government bodies are!
No point to discuss, as you could never teach dog too speak, it will always bark :o

#8 zakk9

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 176 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 19:23:56

View Postmarquess, on 2009-01-26 12:06:36, said:

The people runnng the aviation show here are probably the biggest bunch of idiots in the history of aviation! Why can't they have two airports like other big cities? But his is what probably comes from rote learning, repetition without the ability to think :o

What on earth is the advantage with two airports? It's a waste of time for the passengers and time and money for the airlines.

Have you ever had the "privilege" of arriving with an international flight at Suvarnabhumi to be transferred to Don Muang for your inland flight to Chiang Mai or wherever? Not only does it take extra time, but you have to calculate more than you need in case of traffic jams etc.

#9 wileycoyote

    Wiley Coyote

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,693 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 19:24:50

Ah well,uncertainty & congestion.

Makes a mockery of our Summer bookings...Again !

#10 Sparkles

    Super Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,335 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 19:29:25

View Postbernett, on 2009-01-26 18:45:26, said:

Too bad. I really loved the Don Mueang airport, will this relocation means the the property around the Don Mueng area is going down?
Would make a super bus terminus,no shortage of parking and completion of the rail link would be the icing on the cake. Then again it probaby will be another shopping centre which Bangkok really needs.

#11 kuffki

    Platinum Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,102 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 19:37:53

A stupid question if i may!
But does this mean that most people will loose their jobs? so say 500-1000 people will be out of work? or will they give them new jobs?
Is this being done because of the drop in tourism and just like most other company's worldwide AOT is restructuring to save money?
If it is due to drop in profits then may be the government can use the $100 billion that they have in reserves to keep people employed rather then use the money to keep the baht strong.

#12 asiawatcher

    Platinum Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,660 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 19:38:21

Maybe so but the runway at DM is tragic if you have ever been up front! The building is rampant with vermin and structural problems (like Swampy). But Swampy has reverted to the old block the exit - and no public member has vision of the gigantic flight boards - levels are now blocked to free movement and like the Old DM airport, you have to go outside to travel between gates. Why bother - stay home and tell the tourist and business people AOT is still hemorrhaging stupidity. Unbelievable - but the move will only frustrate travellers so divided as to a nay or yea.

#13 bdenner

    Super Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,529 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 19:39:04

Great move BUT why not wait until the infrastructure is complete. ie. Sky rail, Hotels, Motorways, AANNDD --- Effen Security! With BALLS, no more of the "Everyone was having a good time, good food and good music" as one senior cabinet minister put it.

Lets not have the same bullshlt we went through 2 months ago.

Edited by bdenner, 2009-01-26 19:43:48.


#14 Dean1953

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 72 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 19:43:01

View Postmgc, on 2009-01-26 05:49:51, said:

Lets get all the flights back to Swampy and then the red shirts can have a go this time :o
From what I've heard, the next time the red shirts have a go, the Thai government will take a page from the movie "Blazing Sadles" and bring cardboard airplanes and people to populate D.M. airport and let the red shirts have a go there.

#15 robbo1

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 232 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 19:48:37

View Postzakk9, on 2009-01-26 20:23:56, said:

View Postmarquess, on 2009-01-26 12:06:36, said:

The people runnng the aviation show here are probably the biggest bunch of idiots in the history of aviation! Why can't they have two airports like other big cities? But his is what probably comes from rote learning, repetition without the ability to think :o

What on earth is the advantage with two airports? It's a waste of time for the passengers and time and money for the airlines.

Have you ever had the "privilege" of arriving with an international flight at Suvarnabhumi to be transferred to Don Muang for your inland flight to Chiang Mai or wherever? Not only does it take extra time, but you have to calculate more than you need in case of traffic jams etc.

Totally agree arrive at swampy connect to donmuang to travel country rediculous

#16 lubbkis

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 19:54:01

View Postzakk9, on 2009-01-26 12:23:56, said:

View Postmarquess, on 2009-01-26 12:06:36, said:

The people runnng the aviation show here are probably the biggest bunch of idiots in the history of aviation! Why can't they have two airports like other big cities? But his is what probably comes from rote learning, repetition without the ability to think :o

What on earth is the advantage with two airports? It's a waste of time for the passengers and time and money for the airlines.

Have you ever had the "privilege" of arriving with an international flight at Suvarnabhumi to be transferred to Don Muang for your inland flight to Chiang Mai or wherever? Not only does it take extra time, but you have to calculate more than you need in case of traffic jams etc.


...to say nothing of the increased air safety aspects of having neighbouring glide paths.

#17 marquess

    marquisatal member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,640 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 19:56:43

View Postrobbo1, on 2009-01-26 13:48:37, said:

View Postzakk9, on 2009-01-26 20:23:56, said:

View Postmarquess, on 2009-01-26 12:06:36, said:

The people runnng the aviation show here are probably the biggest bunch of idiots in the history of aviation! Why can't they have two airports like other big cities? But his is what probably comes from rote learning, repetition without the ability to think :o

What on earth is the advantage with two airports? It's a waste of time for the passengers and time and money for the airlines.

Have you ever had the "privilege" of arriving with an international flight at Suvarnabhumi to be transferred to Don Muang for your inland flight to Chiang Mai or wherever? Not only does it take extra time, but you have to calculate more than you need in case of traffic jams etc.

Totally agree arrive at swampy connect to donmuang to travel country rediculous

That is part of the stupdity in the first place that they never developed a link between the two airports when there is a railway station right by Don Muang. As I said one of the biggest bunch of idiots in aviation planning history.

#18 ovenman

    Platinum Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,583 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 19:57:01

View Postrobbo1, on 2009-01-26 07:48:37, said:

View Postzakk9, on 2009-01-26 20:23:56, said:

What on earth is the advantage with two airports? It's a waste of time for the passengers and time and money for the airlines.

Have you ever had the "privilege" of arriving with an international flight at Suvarnabhumi to be transferred to Don Muang for your inland flight to Chiang Mai or wherever? Not only does it take extra time, but you have to calculate more than you need in case of traffic jams etc.
Totally agree arrive at swampy connect to donmuang to travel country rediculous
Unlike say, arriving at Tokyo-Narita from abroad and having to transfer to Haneda for a domestic flight?

#19 wrecker

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 264 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 20:07:51

View Postbernett, on 2009-01-26 18:45:26, said:

Too bad. I really loved the Don Mueang airport, will this relocation means the the property around the Don Mueng area is going down?


Indeed too bad, but it makes you think what the military junta made tick to reopen it. Just plain greed I suppose.

#20 callum06

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 161 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 20:08:11

Good or bad?? The "Amari at Don Mueang are offering 1,100 baht everything included... still worth staying there and getting a taxi into town :o

#21 makescents

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 238 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 20:34:01

View Postbernett, on 2009-01-26 18:45:26, said:

Too bad. I really loved the Don Mueang airport, will this relocation means the the property around the Don Mueng area is going down?

Isn't it over a 100 years old?

They should turn it into some sort of aviation museum.

#22 qualtrough

    Platinum Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,063 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 20:35:46

View Postovenman, on 2009-01-26 19:57:01, said:

View Postrobbo1, on 2009-01-26 07:48:37, said:

View Postzakk9, on 2009-01-26 20:23:56, said:

What on earth is the advantage with two airports? It's a waste of time for the passengers and time and money for the airlines.

Have you ever had the "privilege" of arriving with an international flight at Suvarnabhumi to be transferred to Don Muang for your inland flight to Chiang Mai or wherever? Not only does it take extra time, but you have to calculate more than you need in case of traffic jams etc.
Totally agree arrive at swampy connect to donmuang to travel country rediculous
Unlike say, arriving at Tokyo-Narita from abroad and having to transfer to Haneda for a domestic flight?
Oh, so if the Japanese have that arrangement it must be a good one? One of the reasons some other countries have multiple airports in one city is because of geographical or political restrictions on expanding one of the airports to encompass all services. Suvvanaphum faces no such restriction that I am aware of. From a traveler's point of view it is much better to have things all under one roof. I don't care what the country is, if I have to gather up my luggage upon arrival at the country's main international terminal and then make my own arrangements to schlep across town to make a domestic connection I call that ridiculous. Don Muang is finished, has been for some time, so it is time to get over it and move on.

#23 jaiyenyen

    Senior Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 710 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 20:47:10

So presumably, this news means an end to the possibility of extending the Skytrain to Don Meuang.............Bugger!!!

#24 lifeisadream

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 20:47:55

Some of us love D.M. because we can take the bus from up country, get out at the airport and conveniently get on our flight. D.M. is easier and friendlier...I haven't yet flown domestically out of Suwanabhum and probably won't, even if everything is relocated. I also use Don Mueng when I come into Bangkok on business, stay overnight, jump into a van to Future Park, get off at the airport all for 25B for a wuick trip. In the end you have to walk over the bridge which is just part of the adventure.

#25 zakk9

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 176 posts

Posted 2009-01-26 21:39:46

View Postlifeisadream, on 2009-01-26 13:47:55, said:

Some of us love D.M. because we can take the bus from up country, get out at the airport and conveniently get on our flight. D.M. is easier and friendlier...I haven't yet flown domestically out of Suwanabhum and probably won't, even if everything is relocated. I also use Don Mueng when I come into Bangkok on business, stay overnight, jump into a van to Future Park, get off at the airport all for 25B for a wuick trip. In the end you have to walk over the bridge which is just part of the adventure.

Swampy does have a proper bus terminal with free shuttles from the main terminal (express shuttle from departure and arrival floors), with buses to all over Bangkok, including Ekamai and Mo Chit. There's also an excellent van service to Victory Monument for under 30 baht.

Swampy is bad, but it won't become better by spreading the traffic between two airports.



 


Sponsored by ...

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Quick Navigation   View New Content Site search: