Sponsored by ...
Thailand Second Best-value Destination: Lonely Planet
#1
Posted 2009-11-03 11:55
Iceland, Thailand, London best-value destinations: Lonely Planet
Iceland and London are among the world's best-value destinations thanks to the economic crisis, travel guide firm Lonely Planet said Tuesday, while Thailand remains tough to beat.
South Africa, India, Malaysia, Mexico, Bulgaria, Kenya and Las Vegas in Nevada rounded out the top 10, said the British-based company in its "Best In Travel 2010" guide.
The annual snapshot book captures "the world's hottest travel trends, destinations, journeys and experiences for the year ahead," Lonely Planet said.
The economic collapse in Iceland meant the island was no longer punitively expensive, said the guide, putting the beleaguered country at the top of its best-value list.
"Have you always wanted to discover this magical, mysterious country? To explore ice caps and volcanoes, and wallow in hot springs? Been put off because of the prohibitive prices? Well, 2010 is your year."
Thailand, at number two, remained "perennially good value", said the book.
"It's one of the cheapest long-haul holidays for European holidaymakers... visitors are always spoilt for choice regarding accommodation."
Meanwhile London's days as a costly destination were now over, Lonely Planet said.
"Long ludicrously expensive, London has become much more affordable for visitors from abroad, if not for its residents," said the guide.
"The favourable exchange rate means that travellers will often find hotels and meals up to half the price they were a few years ago."
Elsewhere in the top 10, Malaysia "is a clever choice for travellers on the lookout for a bargain", while in India "your money stretches almost as far as the infamous Indian 'stretchable' time".
"South Africa is not only about an amazing climate, vast unspoilt scenery, balmy sandy beaches, extraordinary wildlife and adventure activities, but the cost of living is low, so it's also excellent value for money."
The top 10 countries overall for travellers were El Salvador, Germany, Greece, Malaysia, Morocco, Nepal, New Zealand, Portugal, Suriname and the United States.
The top 10 cities were Abu Dhabi, Charleston (South Carolina), Cork (Ireland), Cuenca (Ecuador), Istanbul, Kyoto (Japan), Lecce (Italy), Sarajevo, Singapore and Vancouver (Canada).
Bali (Indonesia), Goa (India), Koh Kong (Cambodia), Southern Africa and southwest Western Australia featured among the top 10 regions.
-- Agencies 2009-11-03
____________________________________________________
Get the Nation/Thaivisa news faster via SMS:
14 days free trial, dial *424010011 on your mobile
#3
Posted 2009-11-03 12:44
#4
Posted 2009-11-03 12:52
#5
Posted 2009-11-03 12:56
#6
Posted 2009-11-03 13:02
Another 'nail in the coffin' for the 'glass-half-empty' brigade.
They must be grinding their teeth in chagrin at this point.
Perhaps this nation will NOT slide downwards past Burma and Korea as they had predicted with monotonous regularity over the last 12 months.
What about the drunk Aussie sheila who stole the bar mat? That was meant to have a devastating long term impact on how all foreigners, white and black, fat and skinny, chose to view Thailand.
No?
#8
Posted 2009-11-03 13:12
#9
Posted 2009-11-03 13:15
chefshane, on 2009-11-03 13:02:14, said:
Another 'nail in the coffin' for the 'glass-half-empty' brigade.
They must be grinding their teeth in chagrin at this point.
Perhaps this nation will NOT slide downwards past Burma and Korea as they had predicted with monotonous regularity over the last 12 months.
What about the drunk Aussie sheila who stole the bar mat? That was meant to have a devastating long term impact on how all foreigners, white and black, fat and skinny, chose to view Thailand.
No?
Did I read anywhere in the OP that the tourists were favoring Thailand?NO.It said that thailand was a cheap destination among many others.
Now if only the tourists still had a job and money in the bank then it might be a good thing for the tourist season.
#10
Posted 2009-11-03 13:20
#11
Posted 2009-11-03 13:21
#12
Posted 2009-11-03 13:22
#13
Posted 2009-11-03 13:22
This post has been edited by asiawatcher: 2009-11-03 13:23
#14
Posted 2009-11-03 13:26
#15
Posted 2009-11-03 13:36
#16
Posted 2009-11-03 13:41
Viper, on 2009-11-03 13:26:49, said:
Don't forget that "we" see Thailand differently from the regular tourists. I can see why Tom, Dick and Henriette like Thailand: temples, oriental food, tropical beaches, bamboo bungalows, loads of sunshine and generally friendly people. To people who've been living in Thailand things might be slightly different. But your average tourist doesn't give a toss about being ripped-off. hel_l, they wouldn't be able to tell if they were. The Euro gives you around 50 Baht; to European tourists this simply means a cheap holiday (where a beer is about the same price as it is at home). Infrastructure/transportation is reasonably well organized, so what's there to complain about? Two weeks later they're back home with shiploads of photographs and good memories.
#17
Posted 2009-11-03 13:42
george, on 2009-11-03 11:55:31, said:
Iceland, Thailand, London best-value destinations: Lonely Planet
Iceland and London are among the world's best-value destinations thanks to the economic crisis, travel guide firm Lonely Planet said Tuesday, while Thailand remains tough to beat.
South Africa, India, Malaysia, Mexico, Bulgaria, Kenya and Las Vegas in Nevada rounded out the top 10, said the British-based company in its "Best In Travel 2010" guide.
The annual snapshot book captures "the world's hottest travel trends, destinations, journeys and experiences for the year ahead," Lonely Planet said.
The economic collapse in Iceland meant the island was no longer punitively expensive, said the guide, putting the beleaguered country at the top of its best-value list.
"Have you always wanted to discover this magical, mysterious country? To explore ice caps and volcanoes, and wallow in hot springs? Been put off because of the prohibitive prices? Well, 2010 is your year."
Thailand, at number two, remained "perennially good value", said the book.
"It's one of the cheapest long-haul holidays for European holidaymakers... visitors are always spoilt for choice regarding accommodation."
Meanwhile London's days as a costly destination were now over, Lonely Planet said.
"Long ludicrously expensive, London has become much more affordable for visitors from abroad, if not for its residents," said the guide.
"The favourable exchange rate means that travellers will often find hotels and meals up to half the price they were a few years ago."
Elsewhere in the top 10, Malaysia "is a clever choice for travellers on the lookout for a bargain", while in India "your money stretches almost as far as the infamous Indian 'stretchable' time".
"South Africa is not only about an amazing climate, vast unspoilt scenery, balmy sandy beaches, extraordinary wildlife and adventure activities, but the cost of living is low, so it's also excellent value for money."
The top 10 countries overall for travellers were El Salvador, Germany, Greece, Malaysia, Morocco, Nepal, New Zealand, Portugal, Suriname and the United States.
The top 10 cities were Abu Dhabi, Charleston (South Carolina), Cork (Ireland), Cuenca (Ecuador), Istanbul, Kyoto (Japan), Lecce (Italy), Sarajevo, Singapore and Vancouver (Canada).
Bali (Indonesia), Goa (India), Koh Kong (Cambodia), Southern Africa and southwest Western Australia featured among the top 10 regions.
-- Agencies 2009-11-03
____________________________________________________
Get the Nation/Thaivisa news faster via SMS:
14 days free trial, dial *424010011 on your mobile
Thailand may become number one if they get rid of the Thaksin /Red shirt SOP
#18
Posted 2009-11-03 13:42
Viper, on 2009-11-03 13:26:49, said:
I'm confused. Are you claiming that London is a cheaper holiday than Thailand?
As to what is "better" value in Thailand, I would suspect that accommodations and local food are less expensive.
#19
Posted 2009-11-03 13:48
george, on 2009-11-02 20:55:31, said:
?!?!?!
I once got stuck in Koh Kong for a night on the way to Sihanoukville. There was almost nothing there, except for hotels and beer bars (this was in 2002 I think). My impression was that the whole town's business model was based on tourists getting trapped for the night because they missed the one boat to Sihanoukville. At the time, the Thai-Cambodia Bridge hadn't been completed yet and the only way to Sihanoukville was by boat. The border crossing from Thailand opened at 8am, and you had about 30 minutes to get through and try to catch the boat, which required a taxi or moto ride to a pier some distance away. Maybe the first few people caught it; the rest of us stayed the night in Koh Kong. I have a hard time believing that this narrow window was a coincidence.
It was cheap though.
Apparently it has been been built up a bit since then (and perhaps there was more to it than I knew at the time). Admittedly, since I had no intention of staying there, I didn't do any reading on the place in advance. The staff at the hotel were helpful, but my Khmer was minimal, and their English not much better. I ended up taking a somewhat sketchy motorcycle tour to a "water fall" for the afternoon, and finishing up the evening at a beer bar with my moto driver and his friends (whose food and drinks of course I ended up paying for, although the total bill was quite reasonable).
Has anyone here been to Koh Kong in recent years?
#20
Posted 2009-11-03 13:49
How they could claim that El Salvador, South Africa and Thailand are good tourist destinations? They must be basing their opinion on cost only, with little or no priority given to the safety of the tourist. All three countries posed serious threats to toursists.
#21
Posted 2009-11-03 13:54
chefshane, on 2009-11-03 06:02:14, said:
Another 'nail in the coffin'................................................
What about the drunk Aussie sheila who stole the bar mat? That was meant to have a devastating long term impact on how all foreigners, white and black, fat and skinny, chose to view Thailand.
......................
Until a proper survey has been conducted to ascertain the effect that that had on the travel habits of beermat collecting drunk Aussie Sheilas. I think it best not to jump to conclusions, just yet.
#22
Posted 2009-11-03 13:57
With the Baht as strong as ever against all major western currencies, hard to see how it makes it a top tier value to travel here. Just because LP says it's a good deal, doesn't change reality.
#23
Posted 2009-11-03 14:34
hammered, on 2009-11-03 12:52:21, said:
Didn't you work for GM as a "feel good spokesperson?"
#24
Posted 2009-11-03 14:42
bkkjames, on 2009-11-03 13:57:45, said:
With the Baht as strong as ever against all major western currencies, hard to see how it makes it a top tier value to travel here. Just because LP says it's a good deal, doesn't change reality.
I agree, with the current exchange rate Phuket is more expensive than Spain for example...
#25
Posted 2009-11-03 14:42
Viper, on 2009-11-03 13:26:49, said:
It was only a matter of time before the idiots turned up.
Cheaper in Thailand:
-Accommodation
-Public transport
-Eating out
-Most groceries (apart from imported western items)
-Health care (apart from NHS)
-Fuel
-Insurance
-All kind of taxes
Do I need to go on.........

Help


MultiQuote























