0
Thailand Second Best-value Destination: Lonely Planet
Started by george, 2009-11-03 11:55
#26
Senior Member Posted 2009-11-03 14:48:10
Typical Nation story. Leave out any facts. So if Thailand is second best, which is the BEST country to visit?
#28
Wiley Coyote Posted 2009-11-03 14:57:22
Wonder what criteria they based their results on ?
I am surprised that Mexico and Kenya are being "rounded out " Wiley Coyote #29
Senior Member Posted 2009-11-03 15:23:35
How much does a good rank cost? #30
Titanium Member Posted 2009-11-03 15:29:16
Do I need to go on.........  No, it's sometimes hard to imagine how these publications like LP come up with this stuff, just reinforces my belief that nobody from LP actually travels anywhere they just rely on Google and update their guides about once every ten years. #31
Senior Member Posted 2009-11-03 15:30:34
What utter crap!!! I agree London has now most certainly become better value. Things are much cheaper in comparison to Thailand. Thailand is fast becoming a major rip off! People are still living in the past and still believe the old crap. So what is better value in Thailand? It was only a matter of time before the idiots turned up. Cheaper in Thailand: -Accommodation -Public transport -Eating out -Most groceries (apart from imported western items) -Health care (apart from NHS) -Fuel -Insurance -All kind of taxes Do I need to go on......... Well said Sir! #32
Offline Member Posted 2009-11-03 15:33:48
What utter crap!!! I agree London has now most certainly become better value. Things are much cheaper in comparison to Thailand. Thailand is fast becoming a major rip off! People are still living in the past and still believe the old crap. So what is better value in Thailand? It was only a matter of time before the idiots turned up. Cheaper in Thailand: -Accommodation -Public transport -Eating out -Most groceries (apart from imported western items) -Health care (apart from NHS) -Fuel -Insurance -All kind of taxes Do I need to go on......... Well said Sir! No need to go on but, in the context of the Lonely Planet thing, I believe they were referring to costs faced by visitors? The last 4 points you mention don't really apply. It was only a matter of time before this was pointed out. 
#33
Senior Member Posted 2009-11-03 15:35:20
I suspect this 'news' item was churned out by LP to contain as many key words as possible to have it show up on as many google searches as possible. With the Baht as strong as ever against all major western currencies, hard to see how it makes it a top tier value to travel here. Just because LP says it's a good deal, doesn't change reality. Ha Ha - Online Nation leader currently reads "Thailand always exploits visitors for choice..."  Obviously some veracity creeping into the august organs journalism. How long will it last?  Must be the cold weather 
#34
Senior Member Posted 2009-11-03 15:43:43
When can we see the price of flights coming down?
#35
Advanced Member Posted 2009-11-03 15:47:16
How much does a good rank cost? Nice one! wobenwoute #36
Member Posted 2009-11-03 16:07:41
What utter crap!!! I agree London has now most certainly become better value. Things are much cheaper in comparison to Thailand. Thailand is fast becoming a major rip off! People are still living in the past and still believe the old crap. So what is better value in Thailand? It was only a matter of time before the idiots turned up. Cheaper in Thailand: -Accommodation -Public transport -Eating out -Most groceries (apart from imported western items) -Health care (apart from NHS) -Fuel -Insurance -All kind of taxes Do I need to go on......... Public transport is horrendously expensive, hotels are still way more expensive than here, and as for food - at least 10 times more expensive, especially eating out in good restaurants. #37
Senior Member Posted 2009-11-03 16:08:27
How did Vegas rate? Easier to get mugged? Easier to be ripped off and taxis that you hand your wallet to and say keep the change! Hotels that are way way over priced if you are not a gambler and police and ambulance sirens and guns shots 24/7. Value for money? Try buying any suit at your local tailor there for under 1,000?  Yep - LP were doing these reports off internet blogs! Certainly Las Vegas ranks right there with NYC as the two most expensive ripoffs in the U.S. #38
Advanced Member Posted 2009-11-03 16:09:39
Oops. Perhaps this nation will NOT slide downwards past Burma and Korea as they had predicted with monotonous regularity over the last 12 months. Surely you mean North Korea? Or perhaps a better definition of what " .. slide downwards past .." means. Yes, that was a dream and he just woke up from it.....only in a dream would Thailand even try to compare with "South" Korea. #39
Senior Member Posted 2009-11-03 16:12:21
In case of doubt, Istambul is in Turkey, Yes, and it's not "Constantinople" any more, either. So what? It's not even Istambul. Try Istanbul and you might get somewhere. #40
Senior Member Posted 2009-11-03 16:17:09
The Lonely Planet also stated : "The top 10 countries overall for travellers were El Salvador, Germany, Greece, Malaysia, Morocco, Nepal, New Zealand, Portugal, Suriname and the United States. " and "South Africa, India, Malaysia, Mexico, Bulgaria, Kenya and Las Vegas in Nevada rounded out the top 10, said the British-based company in its "Best In Travel 2010" guide." How they could claim that El Salvador, South Africa and Thailand are good tourist destinations? They must be basing their opinion on cost only, with little or no priority given to the safety of the tourist. All three countries posed serious threats to toursists. What about India? Name me a dirtier country in the world. Kenya, Mexico & South Africa have huge crime rates. I think South Africa leads the world percentage wise in murders, rapes & HIV. I've known businessmen from the U.S. who were forced to go to India as the U.S. ships most of its jobs overseas and many to India thinking they can speak English and who have lost quite a bit of weight because they would not - under any circumstances - eat the food. Kenya, the birthplace of Barack Obama, is not so safe. Thailand is, for the most part clean, the food is clean and good and decent hotels are affordable. If they were not cheap skapes like the Koreans, Japanese, & Koreans wouldn't be flocking here. I have never heard a non-Indian in the U.S. say, "we are saving for a vacation in India." Mexico, man, you want to talk about murder! #41
Senior Member Posted 2009-11-03 16:20:10
The Lonely Planet also stated : "The top 10 countries overall for travellers were El Salvador, Germany, Greece, Malaysia, Morocco, Nepal, New Zealand, Portugal, Suriname and the United States. " and "South Africa, India, Malaysia, Mexico, Bulgaria, Kenya and Las Vegas in Nevada rounded out the top 10, said the British-based company in its "Best In Travel 2010" guide." How they could claim that El Salvador, South Africa and Thailand are good tourist destinations? They must be basing their opinion on cost only, with little or no priority given to the safety of the tourist. All three countries posed serious threats to toursists. What about India? Name me a dirtier country in the world. Kenya, Mexico & South Africa have huge crime rates. I think South Africa leads the world percentage wise in murders, rapes & HIV. I've known businessmen from the U.S. who were forced to go to India as the U.S. ships most of its jobs overseas and many to India thinking they can speak English and who have lost quite a bit of weight because they would not - under any circumstances - eat the food. Kenya, the birthplace of Barack Obama, is not so safe. Thailand is, for the most part clean, the food is clean and good and decent hotels are affordable. If they were not cheap skapes like the Koreans, Japanese, & Koreans wouldn't be flocking here. I have never heard a non-Indian in the U.S. say, "we are saving for a vacation in India." Mexico, man, you want to talk about murder! Meant to say "Chinese" instead of Koreans twice. These countries know a good deal when they see one. And, many people in the world like warm weather. They can swim in the ocean instead of just looking at the beautiful water. Many people from freezing and cold countries flock to Thailand for the weather and certainly the Thai people are much friendlier than are Europeans. #42
Senior Member Posted 2009-11-03 16:25:52
As with everything the cheapest is never the best value
#44
Platinum Member Posted 2009-11-03 16:39:31
Typical Nation story. Leave out any facts. So if Thailand is second best, which is the BEST country to visit? Typical moronic post, not bothering to actually read the article. Here, let me help you: The economic collapse in Iceland meant the island was no longer punitively expensive, said the guide, putting the beleaguered country at the top of its best-value list. TH #45
Advanced Member Posted 2009-11-03 17:12:22
What utter crap!!! I agree London has now most certainly become better value. Things are much cheaper in comparison to Thailand. Thailand is fast becoming a major rip off! People are still living in the past and still believe the old crap. So what is better value in Thailand? I'm confused. Are you claiming that London is a cheaper holiday than Thailand? As to what is "better" value in Thailand, I would suspect that accommodations and local food are less expensive. #46
Senior Member Posted 2009-11-03 17:14:51
Thailand second best-value destination Iceland, Thailand, London best-value destinations: Lonely Planet Iceland and London are among the world's best-value destinations thanks to the economic crisis, travel guide firm Lonely Planet said Tuesday, while Thailand remains tough to beat. South Africa, India, Malaysia, Mexico, Bulgaria, Kenya and Las Vegas in Nevada rounded out the top 10, said the British-based company in its "Best In Travel 2010" guide. The annual snapshot book captures "the world's hottest travel trends, destinations, journeys and experiences for the year ahead," Lonely Planet said. The economic collapse in Iceland meant the island was no longer punitively expensive, said the guide, putting the beleaguered country at the top of its best-value list. "Have you always wanted to discover this magical, mysterious country? To explore ice caps and volcanoes, and wallow in hot springs? Been put off because of the prohibitive prices? Well, 2010 is your year." Thailand, at number two, remained "perennially good value", said the book. "It's one of the cheapest long-haul holidays for European holidaymakers... visitors are always spoilt for choice regarding accommodation." Meanwhile London's days as a costly destination were now over, Lonely Planet said. "Long ludicrously expensive, London has become much more affordable for visitors from abroad, if not for its residents," said the guide. "The favourable exchange rate means that travellers will often find hotels and meals up to half the price they were a few years ago." Elsewhere in the top 10, Malaysia "is a clever choice for travellers on the lookout for a bargain", while in India "your money stretches almost as far as the infamous Indian 'stretchable' time". "South Africa is not only about an amazing climate, vast unspoilt scenery, balmy sandy beaches, extraordinary wildlife and adventure activities, but the cost of living is low, so it's also excellent value for money." The top 10 countries overall for travellers were El Salvador, Germany, Greece, Malaysia, Morocco, Nepal, New Zealand, Portugal, Suriname and the United States. The top 10 cities were Abu Dhabi, Charleston (South Carolina), Cork (Ireland), Cuenca (Ecuador), Istanbul, Kyoto (Japan), Lecce (Italy), Sarajevo, Singapore and Vancouver (Canada). Bali (Indonesia), Goa (India), Koh Kong (Cambodia), Southern Africa and southwest Western Australia featured among the top 10 regions. -- Agencies 2009-11-03 ____________________________________________________ Get the Nation/Thaivisa news faster via SMS: 14 days free trial, dial *424010011 on your mobile #47
Platinum Member Posted 2009-11-03 17:47:02
What utter crap!!! I agree London has now most certainly become better value. Things are much cheaper in comparison to Thailand. Thailand is fast becoming a major rip off! People are still living in the past and still believe the old crap. So what is better value in Thailand? It was only a matter of time before the idiots turned up. Cheaper in Thailand: -Accommodation -Public transport -Eating out -Most groceries (apart from imported western items) -Health care (apart from NHS) -Fuel -Insurance -All kind of taxes Do I need to go on......... Public transport is horrendously expensive, hotels are still way more expensive than here, and as for food - at least 10 times more expensive, especially eating out in good restaurants. I don't agree with all in absolute terms and certainly not in relative terms. We could both pick examples to "prove" one place was better value than the other but one of your moans, about public transport is just ridiculous. The tube is not cheap but you can get a daily pass for tube and bus for £5.60 (up to £7.50 if you include all the way out to zone 6 and Heathrow) and the network is huge. By comparison, Bangkok's network is like the DLR, only smaller ! I know some very good boutique hotels in London which compare well with similar quality Bangkok hotel prices and that is in absolute terms. In relative terms, they are streets ahead. I guess the Oriental in Bangkok is still very well priced ? Joking aside, and forgetting where we live for a moment, London is cheaper for most as the £ is down the toilet. Not cheap, but cheaper. Better value ? almost certainly yes. I used to think some parts of Europe became too expensive after they created the Euro and that was when it was 1.7 to the £. Imagine how bad they are now at near parity ? Food is not 10 times as expensive but I grant you that there are none of the very cheap street eateries. There are terrible hot dog vans though ! I love Thailand but I've been going there and have lived in a number of places in Thailand for long enough now to know that it is not the cheap destination it once was. With businesses in the tourist sector, I know how tourists are hurting and where they make their complaints and it is not about the cost to ride the tube in London ! #48
Senior Member Posted 2009-11-03 17:47:36
"Best-Value" for who? For "Europeans" with nearly 50 baht to the euro maybe? Certainly not for the Brits with 54 baht to the pound right now compared to 70 two years ago. It's all relative (to the exchange rate, and how much other countries are ripping off the tourists of course).
#49
Senior Member Posted 2009-11-03 17:55:39
So what is better value in Thailand? Thai massages #50
Senior Member Posted 2009-11-03 18:14:32
How much does a good rank cost? You hit the nail on the head!!! This must have been expensive as I know since long that Lonely Planet is more politics than objective advice. It's business like everywhere. I cannot more disagree with all of their findings this year... They are completely off track and doomed to be a useless travel guidance which it is already since a couple of years with me! Monkey business...   
|
Sponsored by ... |
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
