Caesar; Uncountably you did not watch or listen to the Red shirt television which was a propaganda platform leading up to the Bangkok demonstration/riots. The funded, bribed part can be argued, until and when the proof is made public (that is being worked on). The feverishly encouraged part, is a matter of public record and its probably safe to say recorded for for the record.
Are you a recent recruit or do you not have access to the public ramblings, screeching of those you seem to want to defend?
This'll be my last post here, as we're off topic.
It's not illegal to fund protests, so why do people keep saying? The Reds may have tried to hide their funding, as people did not want the mistake of people thinking they were protesting for Thaksin, when actually it's way beyond that. They have a legitimate arguement.
The government has blocked some 50,000 web sites recently and closed down not only Red shirt TV channel, but also some independant news has gone off the air. Destroying all opposition forms of opposing view; how can you complain about Red propaganda in this comparison?
It's easy for anyone to label anything as propaganda when they do not agree with the message being spread and they believe the message is designed to inspire people, but that does not make it so. I've not seen any Red propaganda like that used in the PAD media which is in some cases outright racist and threatening to its neighbours, also. The Red "propaganda" I have seen only encourages people to fight for their freedom. Hardly criminal. I'd challenge you to provide links (visible within Thailand) that verify malicous propaganda by the Reds. Best you PM me if you do, though, as we're off topic.
There are no public ramblings anymore, you may pay to note. Public political expression in opposition of the government has been banned whilst pro government protesters remain free to do what they will - a breach of human rights being it illegal to exploit laws in a fashion that descriminates individuals based solely on their political affiliations.
It may also pay to note, one of the Red demands in the protest was an INDEPENDANT body be set up to monitor all Thai media and ensure information being passed is accurate. This is not the actions of a group who derive power from misinformation. Abhisit originally considered the proposal, but also added his defence for his PAD propaganda that although the body should exist, "constructive" media should also remain. Why would he say this? Because he thrives on misinformation.
Yes. Let's take over a large area in the city center, prevent freedom of movement, assault people trying go to work or home, and perform illegal search and seizures under force of arms. Let's burn Bangkok, don't worry if some of those buildings are occupied. Let's assassinate (or attempt to assassinate) the PM, other politicians, and military commanders. Let's kidnap executives to show our determination. Let's storm a hospital, or two, or three, never mind the health care workers and those people who are convalescing. Let's attack soldiers and police with weapons, both modern and primitive. Let's use grenades to attack various targets in a sustained campaign lasting for months on end. Let's hold a neighborhood hostage under thread of immolation by a fuel tanker. Let's wreak havoc on public transportation. Let's bomb innocent civilians.
Caesar; Uncountably you did not watch or listen to the Red shirt television which was a propaganda platform leading up to the Bangkok demonstration/riots. The funded, bribed part can be argued, until and when the proof is made public (that is being worked on). The feverishly encouraged part, is a matter of public record and its probably safe to say recorded for for the record.
Are you a recent recruit or do you not have access to the public ramblings, screeching of those you seem to want to defend?
This'll be my last post here, as we're off topic.
It's not illegal to fund protests, so why do people keep saying? The Reds may have tried to hide their funding, as people did not want the mistake of people thinking they were protesting for Thaksin, when actually it's way beyond that. They have a legitimate arguement.
The government has blocked some 50,000 web sites recently and closed down not only Red shirt TV channel, but also some independant news has gone off the air. Destroying all opposition forms of opposing view; how can you complain about Red propaganda in this comparison?
It's easy for anyone to label anything as propaganda when they do not agree with the message being spread and they believe the message is designed to inspire people, but that does not make it so. I've not seen any Red propaganda like that used in the PAD media which is in some cases outright racist and threatening to its neighbours, also. The Red "propaganda" I have seen only encourages people to fight for their freedom. Hardly criminal. I'd challenge you to provide links (visible within Thailand) that verify malicous propaganda by the Reds. Best you PM me if you do, though, as we're off topic.
There are no public ramblings anymore, you may pay to note. Public political expression in opposition of the government has been banned whilst pro government protesters remain free to do what they will - a breach of human rights being it illegal to exploit laws in a fashion that descriminates individuals based solely on their political affiliations.
It may also pay to note, one of the Red demands in the protest was an INDEPENDANT body be set up to monitor all Thai media and ensure information being passed is accurate. This is not the actions of a group who derive power from misinformation. Abhisit originally considered the proposal, but also added his defence for his PAD propaganda that although the body should exist, "constructive" media should also remain. Why would he say this? Because he thrives on misinformation.
"The Red "propaganda" I have seen only encourages people to fight for their freedom."
Once again you missed the propaganda inciting violence and encouraging protesters to burn down Bangkok.
What a prolific poster you are Octavian. 30 Posts of pure propaganda. 1 day on the forum. Not a single item of personal information on your profile. Seems very odd to me. I wonder which banned poster you are.
You're free to challenge anything I say, unlike I'd be free to say this in the Thai media.
New posters who write a slew of pro-Thaksin posts - fit with the premise of the soon-to-be-released book called GUARDED CONVERSATIONS - about a former Thai PM named Sintax.
As for using the term 'mass murder' - No mass murder took place during the Red occupation of downtown Bkk in March/April of this year. A mass murder is where many people are killed. During the Red problem, there were a few Reds, some soldiers, and a few observers killed, so neither side can be tarred with the hot-button term 'mass murderers' - though Thaksin and Red leaders would sorely like the Int'l press to pin that term on gov't troops.
In reality, gov't forces were either stymied (the cops) or exceedingly restrained (the armed forces), so the Reds and their ilk should be deeply appreciative of the overall restraint and delayed action of gov't forces. Pretty much any other gov't on the planet would have come down like a ton of bricks within the first week of such a protest. But of course, no such appreciation (by Reds) will ever come forth.
Glad it is the last post as you do not seem to want to answer to a denial which you made and to which the reverse was pointed out and the source. You brought the topic up, I responded to it, and now you deem it ;off topic'. Calvin had a answer/expression to all things with which he disagreed even through he knew he was wrong and he did not take up cartoon space with bs. It kept everyone else entertained as well as admitting defeat without the ramblings, we all could probably follow this when the situation applies thus reducing redundancy.
Glad it is the last post as you do not seem to want to answer to a denial which you made and to which the reverse was pointed out and the source. You brought the topic up, I responded to it, and now you deem it ;off topic'. Calvin had a answer/expression to all things with which he disagreed even through he knew he was wrong and he did not take up cartoon space with bs. It kept everyone else entertained as well as admitting defeat without the ramblings, we all could probably follow this when the situation applies thus reducing redundancy.
This OctavianCaesar may have set the record of the number of people annoyed and having less than a single day between registration and being banned. Bravo. does this forum start to attract more madmen these days?
Good news at last. So much about being a mule to some corrupt figure.
CHAYOO!!
Why are you so rude ??
Did you not learn any manners from your parents ?
Like I said before, You cannot be playing with a full deck. What is so rude about this.
Phil, you say there will be things happening. What will happen? Are these threats? If so please tell us more. If not, let the reds make the threats so they can be charged. Don't beat around the bush with your inuendos about what the reds will do with your BS bluffs. Last thing we need is some radical winding the people up and trying to throw unaccountable fear into the people. Take away the paid protestors and you only have less than .001% of the terrosists trying to run the country. Is this your democracy?
What is in it for you? Are you on the Taksin payroll?
What a prolific poster you are Octavian. 30 Posts of pure propaganda. 1 day on the forum. Not a single item of personal information on your profile. Seems very odd to me. I wonder which banned poster you are.
You're free to challenge anything I say, unlike I'd be free to say this in the Thai media.
New posters who write a slew of pro-Thaksin posts - fit with the premise of the soon-to-be-released book called GUARDED CONVERSATIONS - about a former Thai PM named Sintax.
As for using the term 'mass murder' - No mass murder took place during the Red occupation of downtown Bkk in March/April of this year. A mass murder is where many people are killed. During the Red problem, there were a few Reds, some soldiers, and a few observers killed, so neither side can be tarred with the hot-button term 'mass murderers' - though Thaksin and Red leaders would sorely like the Int'l press to pin that term on gov't troops.
In reality, gov't forces were either stymied (the cops) or exceedingly restrained (the armed forces), so the Reds and their ilk should be deeply appreciative of the overall restraint and delayed action of gov't forces. Pretty much any other gov't on the planet would have come down like a ton of bricks within the first week of such a protest. But of course, no such appreciation (by Reds) will ever come forth.
When I said mass-murder I was referring to the approximate 90 dead in total. I include all protesters, journalist, soldiers, bangkok citizens etc. To me they are all human beings, some were there because they were doing their jobs & trying to feed their kids, some were hoping for a better life with the RedMob & 'believed the hype' / took the payout etc.
To me the protestors were of varying levels of innocence and guilt in terms of readiness to fight. The soldiers and police were doing their jobs in extreme heat and at times danger. I don't blame any of the protagonists on the street directly. Even the most violent among them was undoubtably educationally subnormal & I don't blame people if they haven't been taught things.
I blame Thaksin & the leaders, those sly, fat suits-in-roots-clothing. They knew what was going to happen when they handed out the bribes and the weapons & the petrol money. They knew when they made the speeches that were so hateful and frightening to normal people.
In England the Yorkshire Ripper, a serial klller, is often referred to as a mass-murderer despite him killing maybe 15 ladies. A lot less than the 90ish in Bangkok. This is semantics really.
A human being who is from a poor background in a village, with no education or money, given a gun and money and told to kill, is essentially a weapon himself, and thus the person controlling him is an armed murderer.
I accuse Thaksin of being a mass-murderer because he knew what would happen & he went ahead with it, smiling every step of the way. He had freedom and money and was travelling the world but that wasn't enough. He returned and DIRECTLY because of his actions earlier this year 90 people died. That to me is the definition of mass-murder, premeditated and without doubt or remorse. The fact he is too cowardly to admit it, and just runs off afterwards, isn't uncommon among murderers either.
What a prolific poster you are Octavian. 30 Posts of pure propaganda. 1 day on the forum. Not a single item of personal information on your profile. Seems very odd to me. I wonder which banned poster you are.
You're free to challenge anything I say, unlike I'd be free to say this in the Thai media.
You are not free to say this in the Thai media or any media in the world. You are not all there. Youn do not have a memory of all of the red threats and the follow up actions and therfore anything you write is not worth reading. Off to the ignore list with you.
Not exactly what we saw in Bangkok two months ago.
Yes too many people on all sides died. One is too many.
But it wasn't all the same time, same place, same way.
And none of it would have happened except for the
incitements to violent actions and insurrections of the
Red Leaders on the stages. And the hands on direct actions
of the likes the 'on the run' feckless Arrisman.
They pushed it to the limit of the social contract of civil societies,
and then well beyond. It could not be sustained, both in their rhetoric,
and in the society that they were bisecting, and simultaneously was
their womb and placenta.
It was like a parasitic infection in an otherwise reasonably health organism,
but when a parasite is removed, some healthy tissue is also usually lost,
till it can grow back.
They, Thaksin & the Red Mob leaders, funded, bribed and feverishly encouraged others to march upon & commit arson in a densely populated area using explosive devices, sharp implements and firearms.
That makes them complicit in mass-murder. That makes them mass-murderers.
I don't think Thaksin buying a few hundred sacks of rice for protesters constitutes a crime of terrorism.
No such acts of arson were carried out under the orders Red shirt leaders. At the time the Central World incident happened, the Red leaders had surrendered to police and instructed their followers to disperse. The arson attacks were carried out by leaderless individuals no doubt in anger that they'd just seen their comrades slaughtered.
That the mass murder took place before the arson attacks (aside the unarmed 6 individuals shot by snipers in the temple), it's hard to put any sense to what you claim. Let's not forget it was the government and military who authorized the mass murder and carried it out, not Thaksin or any Red leaders.
I'd also challenge you to provide any actual evidence to your claim in the first line. Simply saying something does not make it plausible,.
You make some unsubstantiated comments. Were you there when the leaders made there plans were you a part of the meeting? This has been going on for months now. All of a sudden you join the TV and become a prolific poster. Two and a half months late for the party . You posted
"I don't think Thaksin buying a few hundred sacks of rice for protesters constitutes a crime of terrorism."
You hit the nail right on the head with the first three words. The rest was normal red shirt dribble.
Are you in reality a banned poster or another red shirt air head who has been shot down every time he opened his mouth?And had o change names. Wake up it was not the name people reacted to it was the nonsense you posted.
A lawyer for fugitive ex-premier Thaksin Shinawatra put in a petition yesterday asking the Attorney-General to ensure fair treatment for him in connection with the case about his alleged support of terrorist acts and unrest.
Thanadej Puangpoon gave Thaksin's petition to Panupong Chotisin, Deputy Director-General of the Office of the Attorney-General's special litigation department.
The lawyer said the charge by the Department of Special Investigation against Thaksin was unfair, as it appeared they had intended to take legal action against him in connection with the political unrest.
Thanadej said Thaksin was not a leader of the red-shirt protests - he simply made phone calls to offer moral support to the protesters and their leaders, with no intention of inciting unrest.
Public prosecutors are racing against time to complete their review on terrorism indictments for 25 red-shirt suspects before the 84-day deadline under the emergency rules expires in less than two weeks.
Should the prosecution review fail to meet the deadline, the authorities are obligated to free the suspects under remand. One of the 25 suspects, red-shirt guard Chayut Laicharoen, will be the first to complete his remand detention on August 17.
Deputy Attorney-General Waiyawut Lohtrakul yesterday conceded he was uncertain if the prosecution review could be completed on time.
"The defence has filed a number of petitions questioning the investigative reports on the suspects and public prosecutors are obligated to examine all defence arguments in order to ensure fairness," he said.
Waiyawut said none of the prosecutors wanted to see the suspects freed from remand because some might flee.
Ruj Kuensuwan, a member of the prosecution team, said the case involving Chayut might be put on a fast-track review in order to meet the deadline, otherwise the suspect would walk free and could not be summoned back for indictment.
Lawyer requires inquiry of six defense witnesses for Thaksin
BANGKOK, Aug. 3 (Xinhua) -- A petition was submitted to Thailand's Office of Attorney-General (OAG) Tuesday requiring it to inquire six more witnesses prior to making a decision if to file a suit against ousted former Thai Premier Thaksin Shinawatra on terrorism charges.
The petition was submitted by Thanadet Puangpoon, the lawyer of Thaksin at 10 a.m., local time.
Most of those six more defense witnesses mentioned by the lawyer are Thailand's leading opposition Puea Thai Party MPs.
According to the petition, Thanadet said, it is not fair the Justice Ministry's Department of Special Investigation (DSI) had asked the OAG to indict Thaksin along with 25 other suspects on terrorism charges without questioning Thaksin's witnesses.
Panupong Chotisin, deputy director-general of the Special Cases Litigation Department received the petition for further consideration.
If the petition was turned down, the witnesses would be arranged to testify in court, Thanadet said.
Thaksin was ousted by a military coup in September, 2006, in accusation of massive corruption, and kept in exile since then. Thaksin returned to Thailand in February, 2008 to face corruption charges, but he later fled into exile again and was convicted in absentia.
Lawyer requires inquiry of six defense witnesses for Thaksin
BANGKOK, Aug. 3 (Xinhua) -- A petition was submitted to Thailand's Office of Attorney-General (OAG) Tuesday requiring it to inquire six more witnesses prior to making a decision if to file a suit against ousted former Thai Premier Thaksin Shinawatra on terrorism charges.
The petition was submitted by Thanadet Puangpoon, the lawyer of Thaksin at 10 a.m., local time.
Most of those six more defense witnesses mentioned by the lawyer are Thailand's leading opposition Puea Thai Party MPs.
According to the petition, Thanadet said, it is not fair the Justice Ministry's Department of Special Investigation (DSI) had asked the OAG to indict Thaksin along with 25 other suspects on terrorism charges without questioning Thaksin's witnesses.
Panupong Chotisin, deputy director-general of the Special Cases Litigation Department received the petition for further consideration.
If the petition was turned down, the witnesses would be arranged to testify in court, Thanadet said.
Thaksin was ousted by a military coup in September, 2006, in accusation of massive corruption, and kept in exile since then. Thaksin returned to Thailand in February, 2008 to face corruption charges, but he later fled into exile again and was convicted in absentia.
Indictments come from a preponderance of evidence indicating a crime likely has been committed and by whom.
It is not necessary to ask all and sundry for their opinions, but that enough evidence is presented to warrant charges.
He is indicted and then his lawyer can call whom he wishes to testify later in court...
if the charged individual actual deigns to show up like a real man among men..
Good news at last. So much about being a mule to some corrupt figure.
CHAYOO!!
Why are you so rude ??
Did you not learn any manners from your parents ?
Like I said before, You cannot be playing with a full deck. What is so rude about this.
Phil, you say there will be things happening. What will happen? Are these threats? If so please tell us more. If not, let the reds make the threats so they can be charged. Don't beat around the bush with your inuendos about what the reds will do with your BS bluffs. Last thing we need is some radical winding the people up and trying to throw unaccountable fear into the people. Take away the paid protestors and you only have less than .001% of the terrosists trying to run the country. Is this your democracy?
What is in it for you? Are you on the Taksin payroll?
Just noticed your response and you make some comments that need reply.
1: Your reference to " full deck" is insulting -- An apology would be appreciated.
2: I was not making any threat and it is asinine to imply that I was.
3: Please retract your comment about my BS ( assume you mean "bullshit") bluffs.
Your comment has no meaning, to what "bluff" do you refer ?
4: Just curious,but who are you referring to when you state "....less than .001% of the terrosists
trying to run the country. "
The meaning is not clear to me.
5:"What's in it for me ? "
As a resident here I have my opinions, same as you.
6: And finally, NO , I am NOT on Taksin's payroll and your suggestion that I am is both insulting and
derogatory.
You should apologise or substantiate and let's meet in Court.
Khon Kaen police have issued several arrest warrants against red-shirt suspects believed to be involved in the unrest in April and May, but so far no suspects have been arrested.
Officials from the Khon Kaen Provincial Police Bureau, the Department of Special Investigation, the provincial Public Prosecutors Office and involved parties held a meeting to follow up on progress in the investigation into six cases of red-shirt disturbances in the province.
Five of those involved red-shirt road blockade that are now under the supervision of Pol, Ban Phai and Si Chompu police stations.
In April, local red-shirt supporters closed inbound traffic lanes on Friendship Highway to search for military officials in all vehicles headed in the direction of Bangkok after hearing a rumor that the military would crack down on the mass rally in the capital.
As a result, a number of soldiers were detained by the protesters.
The Khon Kaen court has approved arrest warrants for ten suspects believed to be involved in the cases, but no suspect has been apprehended so far.
Another case is the Khon Kaen railway train station seizure by local red-shirt activists.
They had seized a train carrying Humvees, GMC trucks, and tanker trucks as well as soldiers out of suspicion that the equipment and troops were heading to Bangkok as reinforcement for a potential crackdown on the anti-government red-shirt protests.
The conclusion about the train seizure case has yet to be made and no suspects have been identified.
The provincial authorities have secured eight arrest warrants for suspects involved in the torching of the provincial hall and a local NBT television station, but until now, no suspects have been arrested.
A woman identified as Mrs Kor has been implicated by a key suspect of being a money courier for the red-shirted protests in May, authorities said yesterday.
"If he further incriminates the woman and the DSI can obtain more evidence against her, an arrest warrant will be sought for this [new] suspect," Tharit Phengdit, directorgeneral of the Department of Special Investigation, said yesterday.
Jakchalat Khongsuwan, a chauffeur and personal bodyguard for Army specialist Khattiya Sawasdipol, who was killed by a sniper in the protests, is still in military custody after his arrest last week, so has not been interrogated by the DSI, Tharit said.
The woman is believed to have delivered funds to Khattiya at various places on many occasions.
Tharit said he needed to obtain more proof and question Jakchalat before deciding that she was connected to any of all the 83 people whose assets had been frozen on suspicion of funding the violent demonstrations.
The 25 suspects in the torching of Central World and other buildings at the end of the protests in late May will be processed for indictment by public prosecutors next week.
In Chiang Mai, police yesterday detained a man suspected of joining an attack on the home of a People Alliance for Democracy activist two years ago and killing his father.
Daeng Puanmool, a member of the pro-Thaksin Shinawatra Rak Chiang Mai 51 Group, was arrested shortly after midnight at his wife's house in Hang Dong district.
Five men taking part in the gang attack are serving 20year prison terms and police are going after two other men seen in media footage.
On November 26, 2009, some 200 Rak Chiang Mai 51 Group members barricaded the home of Therdsak Jiamkijwatthana in the Raming Niwet housing estate in Muang district, and later attacked a pickup truck commandeered by his father Settha and killed him. Eight men have been charged with murder including the five convicts and Daeng.
Thepthai Senapong, the prime minister's spokesman, said the opposition Pheu Thai Party had been over-worried about statements by Jakchalat and most suspects implicating people in the red movement.
"This is probably because the PT members are afraid that they could be also implicated, so they usually come up with preemptive attacks that the police and the government are making arrests of scapegoats," he said.
Jatuporn Promphan, a red shirt leader and PT party-list MP, accused public prosecutors of rushing indictments against him and all red suspects in custody - by announcing the completion of all cases last Wednesday despite the last minute legal deadline on September 7.
All the suspects, including Jatuporn, are scheduled to be escorted to the Criminal Court today for arraignment or other orders.
A woman identified as Mrs Kor has been implicated by a key suspect of being a money courier for the red-shirted protests in May, authorities said yesterday.
"If he further incriminates the woman and the DSI can obtain more evidence against her, an arrest warrant will be sought for this [new] suspect," Tharit Phengdit, directorgeneral of the Department of Special Investigation, said yesterday.
Jakchalat Khongsuwan, a chauffeur and personal bodyguard for Army specialist Khattiya Sawasdipol, who was killed by a sniper in the protests, is still in military custody after his arrest last week, so has not been interrogated by the DSI, Tharit said.
Now that there has been some investigating of him, some interesting developments:
Department of Special Investigation (DSI) Director-General Tharit Pengdit yesterday confirmed that there was a possibility that a suspect arrested for red riot could probably be the same man wanted for a massacre at a mosque in Narathiwat.
"From information we have received, he is very likely the same person," Tharit said, "We are investigating into this suspect's history".
Tharit was speaking about Jakchalat Kongsuwan, who has now been detained at a military camp for violating the State of Emergency Decree.
Jakchalat was also described as a close aide of Major-General Khattiya Sawasdiphol, who helped with the red shirts' security measures before his death in May.
Latest information suggested that Jakchalat might have been previously known as Suttirak Kongswan, who reported himself to the Crime Suppression Bureau in January to face charges relating to the fatal attack on Al Furqon Mosque last year.
The attack killed 10 people who were performing religious ritual at the mosque.
Suttirak, a former ranger, had been released on bail.
"Then two months ago, his bondman withdrew the surety," Tharit said.
Since his arrest, Jakchalat has reportedly given crucial information to authorities including how a woman with K initial picked up money from Thaksin Shinawatra and passed it to Khattiya for operations to stir up violence.
It is now widely speculated that the woman was Kanokwan Witjitrawiwat, a leader of red-shirt United Front of Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD) in Prachin Buri.
When asked about this, Tharit said, "I cannot confirm this piece of information. DSI has not yet received information on this part".
Tharit said officials were now instructed to watch over Kanokwan's house.
An informed source said relevant officials also searched three houses identified by Jakchalat as the places where cash for violent operation were paid.
According to the source, the first house was located in Phutthamonthol area and was now abandoned.
"The owner of the second house has already gone on the run. We have found three big safety boxes in the place, though. We are in the process of opening them for examination," the source added.
On arson attacks at the Central World shopping complex, the Criminal Court yesterday approved arrest warrants for two more suspects captured on the video recordings.
"We have not yet known their names," Pol Lt Col Phayao Thongsen said as the chief investigator in terrorism cases.
To date, arrest warrants have been issued for nine suspects in the Central World case.
"We have already prosecuted suspected arsonists on two other cases, one at the Bangkok Bank's Phra Khanong branch in Bangkok and the other in Chiang Mai," Phayao said.
Meanwhile, Pheu Thai MPs Jatuporn Promhan and Karun Hosakul reported themselves to the Criminal Court as required by their bail conditions. They are charged with terrorism for their role in the red-shirt rally.
During their visit, they also successfully obtained the court's permission to postpone their trial from September 27 to a later date after the parliamentary session ended on September 27.
Jatuporn added that starting next month, Pheu Thai MPs and key red shirts would deliver speeches across the country to inform the public of the Pheu Thai Party's policies and the current government's poor performance.
Jatuporn added that starting next month, Pheu Thai MPs and key red shirts would deliver speeches across the country to inform the public of the Pheu Thai Party's policies and the current government's poor performance.
I thought the PTP policy was so simple it didn't need explanation: 'bring back K. Thaksin'
Jatuporn added that starting next month, Pheu Thai MPs and key red shirts would deliver speeches across the country to inform the public of the Pheu Thai Party's policies and the current government's poor performance.
I thought the PTP policy was so simple it didn't need explanation: 'bring back K. Thaksin'
Yesterday Jatupon told 500 of the red shirts in Chiang Mai that Thaksin had twittered him and told him he was going to meet Nelson Mandela to discuss how to proceed regarding the deaths of 91 Thais in the red shirt riots!
Who tells more lies, Jatupon or Thaksin? It's a close contest.
This OctavianCaesar may have set the record of the number of people annoyed and having less than a single day between registration and being banned. Bravo. does this forum start to attract more madmen these days?
It is the same 6 guys (on both sides) that re-register and get banned after days-weeks again and again...
Jatuporn added that starting next month, Pheu Thai MPs and key red shirts would deliver speeches across the country to inform the public of the Pheu Thai Party's policies and the current government's poor performance.
I thought the PTP policy was so simple it didn't need explanation: 'bring back K. Thaksin'
Yesterday Jatupon told 500 of the red shirts in Chiang Mai that Thaksin had twittered him and told him he was going to meet Nelson Mandela to discuss how to proceed regarding the deaths of 91 Thais in the red shirt riots!
Who tells more lies, Jatupon or Thaksin? It's a close contest.
The Red Drama Queen Traveling Troupe during their Chiang Mai performance yesterday:
0
slapout, on 2010-07-31 12:23:06, said:
