Do not make the common Western mistake of associating the brain with the mind..... Asians usually put the mind more in the region of the heart...although it is actually seperate from the body and therefore cannot be examined by searching for it..
Having said that, mind cannot exist without body, and body without mind.
Mind & body are co dependent.
Well, we all talk about the mind, but I don't know if we know what it is, let alone if it's separate from the body or embedded in it.
I'm not sure what the Buddha thought the mind was. He spoke about "thought" or "the mind", as reported in the
Dhammapada, and regarded it as prior to action, but I don't know if he argued one way or the other as to whether it was separate from or included in the "aggregates" (
skandhas).
Everyone just assumes that each of us has a mind and that it’s different for each of us, but it seems to me we just have different memories.
If I have a mind, I’d like to know where it is, perhaps so I could give it a tune-up or something. Naturalists, like Owen Flanagan (“The Bodhisattva’s Brain”) don’t seem to believe in minds – just brains and all the neuronal things brains do.
Gilbert Ryle (“The Concept of Mind”, 1948) regarded “mind” as a
category mistake. We look at all the things we think are products of the mind or mental events and we project from this that there is an entity behind them, but we can’t in fact locate it. It’s as if, having seen companies of soldiers on parade, we turn to our neighbour and ask “But where’s the battalion?”.
We know we have consciousness, and we know we have memory and imagination and reasoning ability. Moreover, we know that others have these things, too. Are these the things that constitute mind or are they derived from some kind of
universal mind, something
beyond our individual consciousness and on which we draw to initiate thought and action, both of which are products of the brain and the central nervous system?
In drawing on a ‘cosmic’ mind, perhaps we adapt it to our level of awareness and taint it with the karmic effects of greed, anger and delusion, thus appropriating it to ourselves in a sullied form. If this is so, the “Mind” on which we draw is untainted and, if coupled with a life lived according to the Dhamma, retains its purity. Translated into intention and action, the pure Mind exercises a therapeutic role in our lives. In Buddhist teaching, this will ensure a serene life and a good rebirth.
I’m not sure, though, how this differs from the Hindu belief that we are each individually one with the Ultimate Reality,
Brahman, as expressed in the wonderful Sanskrit aphorism
Tat Tvam Asi, “Thou art That” or “That thou Art”. However, one thing we can be sure of is that we can’t point to any one phenomenon and say “Thou art Mind”.