Posted 2012-02-05 06:25:22
Capital should be moved to Northeast, top scientist says
The Nation on Sunday
BANGKOK:-- Dr Art-Ong Jumsai na Ayudhya, a former scientist at the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Nasa), has called for the relocation of Thailand's capital to the Northeast.
Speaking at a seminar on climate change, natural disasters, and the future of Thailand, Art-ong said Bangkok is sinking every year because of the rising sea level.
Citing the rising amount of rainfall and the rising dam water level in 2010 and 2011, he said the trend will worsen in 2012 and in coming years, so authorities have to increase efficiency in draining the excess water into the sea.
Regarding the capital, he said, far-sighted leaders should consider relocating out of Bangkok, which has been the country's capital for more than 200 years, to a higher ground such as one of the 16 northeastern provinces.
Relocation of the capital will take at least 20 years and a brand-new capital should be built as Bangkok will face difficulties in managing excess water in the next seven or eight years.
 -- The Nation 2012-02-05
Posted 2012-02-05 08:44:54
I'm looking forward to my new government- provided hacienda on 2 hectares when it happens. Along with the rest of Bangkok's population. Wonder who owns all that Isaan land? Nice little earner for someone(s).
Posted 2012-02-05 08:48:12
POPULAR
Can we drag it upriver using thousands of boats?
Posted 2012-02-05 09:05:26
Years ago Bangkok was known as "The Venice of The East", maybe in a few years it can use that name again to attract tourists.
Miracles notwithstanding. 
gon.jpg 2.8K
18 downloads
Posted 2012-02-05 09:12:11
Flooding aside, actually a brilliant idea, seat of govt having its own city. Govt can sell all its land and do something truly remarkable for the people. Land prices will drop making land more affordable for working and middle classes in BKK. Issan would benefit hugely as well.
Posted 2012-02-05 09:46:56
 bangkokburning, on 2012-02-05 09:12:11, said:
Flooding aside, actually a brilliant idea, seat of govt having its own city. Govt can sell all its land and do something truly remarkable for the people. Land prices will drop making land more affordable for working and middle classes in BKK. Issan would benefit hugely as well.
Sounds similar to Burma ?
Posted 2012-02-05 09:50:01
ratcatcher, on 2012-02-05 09:05:26, said:
Years ago Bangkok was known as "The Venice of The East", maybe in a few years it can use that name again to attract tourists.
Miracles notwithstanding.  gon.jpg
And just a few years later, they can rename it Waterworld , after the film about a drowned city ? 
While I agree that a gradual move to a dryer location makes sense, I would however disagree that the North-East is the automatic choice, surely there is some above-sea-level land closer to the current capital, than that ? Perhaps 50-100 miles North of Bangkok might be far enough ?
Or DL might decide to favour his own home-town, ahead of Isarn, who knows what he may decide for the country's future ? 
Posted 2012-02-05 09:50:28
Since when has Jataporn been a top scientist! Just trying save his bus fare money!
Posted 2012-02-05 09:57:42
Was he wearing a nice red suit when he made these remarks?
Posted 2012-02-05 09:59:08
Well-known Thai scientist suggests capital relocation
BANGKOK, (NNT) - Thailand's well-known scientist, Dr. Art-ong Jumsai Na Ayudhya, has cautioned Thai people especially Bangkok-dwellers to prepare for more floods, which are likely to worsen each year.
Dr. Art-ong, a NASA scientist forecast that Bangkok might be able to sustain flooding for no more than eight years whereas the relocation of the capital city could take as long as 20 years.
Dr. Art-ong suggested that a new capital city be built, adding that one of the 16 provinces in the northeastern plateau would be a favorable location.
Aside from his flood prediction, the country’s best known scientist has warned of Aurora phenomenon in the northern hemisphere which is likely to disrupt aeronautical communication systems worldwide. The impact of the phenomenon would be severe in December but would ease in early 2013.
 -- NNT 2012-02-05
Posted 2012-02-05 10:05:00
And the Government can relocate all goverment departments and government staff there cost-free?
bangkokburning, on 2012-02-05 09:12:11, said:
Flooding aside, actually a brilliant idea, seat of govt having its own city. Govt can sell all its land and do something truly remarkable for the people. Land prices will drop making land more affordable for working and middle classes in BKK. Issan would benefit hugely as well.
Edited by Reasonableman, 2012-02-05 10:05:53.
Posted 2012-02-05 10:15:52
POPULAR
Well, it would definitely reduce the travel expenses for future redshirt excursions to the capital.
Posted 2012-02-05 10:26:56
Sounds like the man in Hong Kong is looking to make a killing in Issan real estate.
Posted 2012-02-05 10:32:08
It's a Thatcher-like scheme. Sell the givernment buidlings in Bangkok at a huge cost. Might help pay off some of that massive debt.
Posted 2012-02-05 10:47:59
Thaksin would love that. Move the capital to the heart of red land and bring his dreams of a nation divided by 'colour' ever closer.
Posted 2012-02-05 10:51:47
The theory behind a move of Thailands Capital amounts to the former NASA scientist being a Troll Proper................come on folks ....chime in!
Posted 2012-02-05 11:05:31
ratcatcher, on 2012-02-05 09:05:26, said:
Years ago Bangkok was known as "The Venice of The East", maybe in a few years it can use that name again to attract tourists.
Miracles notwithstanding. gon.jpg
How abour "Atlantis of the East"?
Posted 2012-02-05 11:23:05
Capital should be moved to Northeast
You've got to be kidding.
The capital of Thailand in Issan..
Rediculous.........
Posted 2012-02-05 11:52:23
Petchabun - perfect place. Plus the value of our 27 rai will rocket.
Posted 2012-02-05 12:11:44
bangkokburning, on 2012-02-05 09:12:11, said:
Flooding aside, actually a brilliant idea, seat of govt having its own city. Govt can sell all its land and do something truly remarkable for the people. Land prices will drop making land more affordable for working and middle classes in BKK. Issan would benefit hugely as well.
Something called "face" in Thailand.... Issan will NEVER be the Thai capital... Hua Hin is possibly the best option... A capital should be beside the sea .. in case of war.. Unless of course Thailand follows Australia, but look what a huge mistake that was.... All of the worlds most beautiful and comfortable Capitals are beside waterways of some sort... I vote Hua Hin...
Posted 2012-02-05 12:13:00
mikecwm, on 2012-02-05 11:52:23, said:
Petchabun - perfect place. Plus the value of our 27 rai will rocket.
You can have, I like our sleepy little hollow in Chiangmai just the way it is. We don't have all the problems that places like Bangkok, Pattaya and Phuket have. Well not on the same scale that is. If Petchabun takes the capital then you get all the baggage and dirty laundry as well. Good luck with your life on your 27 rai.
Posted 2012-02-05 12:26:18
Bakseedaa, on 2012-02-05 12:11:44, said:
bangkokburning, on 2012-02-05 09:12:11, said:
Flooding aside, actually a brilliant idea, seat of govt having its own city. Govt can sell all its land and do something truly remarkable for the people. Land prices will drop making land more affordable for working and middle classes in BKK. Issan would benefit hugely as well.
Something called "face" in Thailand.... Issan will NEVER be the Thai capital... Hua Hin is possibly the best option... A capital should be beside the sea .. in case of war.. Unless of course Thailand follows Australia, but look what a huge mistake that was.... All of the worlds most beautiful and comfortable Capitals are beside waterways of some sort... I vote Hua Hin...
Why should a capital be beside the sea? And why is Canberra "a huge mistake"?
The only reason that a lot of capitals are traditionally beside the sea is that they are usually the biggest cities because of the trade at seaside ports. These days, there is no reason for the government to be near the ports.
Posted 2012-02-05 12:27:45
"Dr. Art-ong, a NASA scientist forecast that Bangkok might be able to sustain flooding for no more than eight years whereas the relocation of the capital city could take as long as 20 years".
Using simple maths, this should have been initiated 12 years ago - meaning that it is Thaksin fault as it was his government that was in power and it was on his watch. You just cannot trust anything he does (doesn't do) can you!!!!
Hasn't this joker got something better to do with his time?? Mind you, as he claims to be a NASA scientist why don't we be brazen and forward thinking and relocate Bangkok to the moon - I can see one insurmountable problem though and that is loss of tourism through not being able to hold full moon parties!!!! Can you have full earth parties with everyone on the earth switching on all available light sources on specific days to suit?????
Another thing - as far as I'm aware you cannot grow Jasmine rice on the moon unless scientists can produce GMO rice seeds with a good dollop of mercury or lead incorporated into the rice grains, plus the seas are bereft of water so that would stuff the fisherman - it seems my idea is falling apart so why don't we keep BKK where it is and build a Bangkok barrier on the Chao Phraya river (a la thames barrier) and put a dividing wall between the North East and Central Thailand or build a massive plughole in the middle of thailand and send the water to the earth's core.
Posted 2012-02-05 12:32:21
Bakseedaa, on 2012-02-05 12:11:44, said:
bangkokburning, on 2012-02-05 09:12:11, said:
Flooding aside, actually a brilliant idea, seat of govt having its own city. Govt can sell all its land and do something truly remarkable for the people. Land prices will drop making land more affordable for working and middle classes in BKK. Issan would benefit hugely as well.
Something called "face" in Thailand.... Issan will NEVER be the Thai capital... Hua Hin is possibly the best option... A capital should be beside the sea .. in case of war.. Unless of course Thailand follows Australia, but look what a huge mistake that was.... All of the worlds most beautiful and comfortable Capitals are beside waterways of some sort... I vote Hua Hin...
A Capital doesn't have to be near the sea, Canberra is long way from the ocean and functions quite well in the modern world. (get rid of some of the pollies and it will function very well) Australia's 1st capital, Melbourne was by the sea but was move to keep all the moaning Sydney siders happy 
Posted 2012-02-05 12:41:56
POPULAR
Bakseedaa, on 2012-02-05 12:11:44, said:
Something called "face" in Thailand.... Issan will NEVER be the Thai capital... Hua Hin is possibly the best option... A capital should be beside the sea .. in case of war.. Unless of course Thailand follows Australia, but look what a huge mistake that was.... All of the worlds most beautiful and comfortable Capitals are beside waterways of some sort... I vote Hua Hin...
Unless of course Thailand follows Austria, Germany, Belgium, France, Canada, Egypt ......
|
|
0
