Posted 2012-02-10 20:22:57
 scorecard, on 2012-02-10 11:02:43, said:
geriatrickid, on 2012-02-10 10:44:40, said:
Until the full facts are detailed, all we have is an uncorroborated allegation.
If the chap feels he was assaulted, he should make a complaint or else understand the perception that he is trying to get some free publicity.
There is a chance he may have gotten to close and presented a threat to someone. In today's climate one never knows if the person getting too close is a wacko.
Your last sentence is of your own manufacture, and your the poster who frequently insists that TV members should provide evidence / data / links, whatever to back up their comments. More double standards from the paymasters worshipers.
Rubbish. It is the sad reality of being public figure. You want facts and figures? Ronald Reagan was shot at by an insane man. Many people were left with serious injuries. Congresswoman Giffords recently recovered from a similar event. she was at a harmless meet and greet. In Sri Lanka assailants have appeared out of nowhere. to attack the PM. In Pakistan assailants have gone kaboom. In the EU celebrities have been attacked. It is a regular occurrence for minor US movie stars to have stalkers. Poor little Justin Bieber has one guy thats stalking him now. Remember Selena the latina singer that was killed by a an "admirer"? How is it a double standard to acknowledge that there are a lot of wackos in circulation and one has to exercise appropriate caution. Get within the bubble of the UK PM and you're going down. Get within the bubble of a US President or Russian PM and you may end up dead. It is common sense to give VIPs like a PM space. One doesn't know if in this case the man got into the security zone, Once more facts come out, we'll be able to see.
BTW, former Abhisit's security detail was working overtime during the Bangkok troubles. Many people were shoved or otherwise roughly handled when his security detail felt they got too close. I don't see anyone making a fuss over that. The response was most likely justified. Here's a tip: Don't get in the face of a Thai PM as you will get hurt. OK?
Posted 2012-02-10 20:36:30
geriatrickid, on 2012-02-10 20:22:57, said:
scorecard, on 2012-02-10 11:02:43, said:
geriatrickid, on 2012-02-10 10:44:40, said:
Until the full facts are detailed, all we have is an uncorroborated allegation.
If the chap feels he was assaulted, he should make a complaint or else understand the perception that he is trying to get some free publicity.
There is a chance he may have gotten to close and presented a threat to someone. In today's climate one never knows if the person getting too close is a wacko.
Your last sentence is of your own manufacture, and your the poster who frequently insists that TV members should provide evidence / data / links, whatever to back up their comments. More double standards from the paymasters worshipers.
Rubbish. It is the sad reality of being public figure. You want facts and figures? Ronald Reagan was shot at by an insane man. Many people were left with serious injuries. Congresswoman Giffords recently recovered from a similar event. she was at a harmless meet and greet. In Sri Lanka assailants have appeared out of nowhere. to attack the PM. In Pakistan assailants have gone kaboom. In the EU celebrities have been attacked. It is a regular occurrence for minor US movie stars to have stalkers. Poor little Justin Bieber has one guy thats stalking him now. Remember Selena the latina singer that was killed by a an "admirer"? How is it a double standard to acknowledge that there are a lot of wackos in circulation and one has to exercise appropriate caution. Get within the bubble of the UK PM and you're going down. Get within the bubble of a US President or Russian PM and you may end up dead. It is common sense to give VIPs like a PM space. One doesn't know if in this case the man got into the security zone, Once more facts come out, we'll be able to see.
BTW, former Abhisit's security detail was working overtime during the Bangkok troubles. Many people were shoved or otherwise roughly handled when his security detail felt they got too close. I don't see anyone making a fuss over that. The response was most likely justified. Here's a tip: Don't get in the face of a Thai PM as you will get hurt. OK?
Don't worry about it GK; like so many of his persuasion he responds to the name and not the content
Posted 2012-02-10 21:41:16
geriatrickid, on 2012-02-10 20:22:57, said: scorecard, on 2012-02-10 11:02:43, said:
geriatrickid, on 2012-02-10 10:44:40, said:
Until the full facts are detailed, all we have is an uncorroborated allegation.
If the chap feels he was assaulted, he should make a complaint or else understand the perception that he is trying to get some free publicity.
There is a chance he may have gotten to close and presented a threat to someone. In today's climate one never knows if the person getting too close is a wacko.
Your last sentence is of your own manufacture, and your the poster who frequently insists that TV members should provide evidence / data / links, whatever to back up their comments. More double standards from the paymasters worshipers.
Rubbish. It is the sad reality of being public figure. You want facts and figures? Ronald Reagan was shot at by an insane man. Many people were left with serious injuries. Congresswoman Giffords recently recovered from a similar event. she was at a harmless meet and greet. In Sri Lanka assailants have appeared out of nowhere. to attack the PM. In Pakistan assailants have gone kaboom. In the EU celebrities have been attacked. It is a regular occurrence for minor US movie stars to have stalkers. Poor little Justin Bieber has one guy thats stalking him now. Remember Selena the latina singer that was killed by a an "admirer"? How is it a double standard to acknowledge that there are a lot of wackos in circulation and one has to exercise appropriate caution. Get within the bubble of the UK PM and you're going down. Get within the bubble of a US President or Russian PM and you may end up dead. It is common sense to give VIPs like a PM space. One doesn't know if in this case the man got into the security zone, Once more facts come out, we'll be able to see.
BTW, former Abhisit's security detail was working overtime during the Bangkok troubles. Many people were shoved or otherwise roughly handled when his security detail felt they got too close. I don't see anyone making a fuss over that. The response was most likely justified. Here's a tip: Don't get in the face of a Thai PM as you will get hurt. OK?
There was no suggestion that Yingluck was close.
Posted with Thaivisa App http://apps.thaivisa.com
Posted 2012-02-10 21:51:14
dominique355, on 2012-02-10 16:59:32, said:
In the other English speaking newspaper it was reported that Yingluck came to the Four Seasons Hotel, went up to a room and must have seen Akeyuth on her way up. She came donw again 2 hours later and left. Minutes after the attack occured.
Just wonder what happened in the room upstairs  and if the two incidents are connected.
She must have seen.....do you check hotel lobbies on your way up to a room, dominique?
Posted 2012-02-10 22:23:18
geriatrickid, on 2012-02-10 10:44:40, said:
In today's climate one never knows if the person getting too close is a wacko.
That will be my defense and I am sticking to it.
Posted 2012-02-10 22:27:01
dominique355, on 2012-02-10 16:59:32, said:
In the other English speaking newspaper it was reported that Yingluck came to the Four Seasons Hotel, went up to a room and must have seen Akeyuth on her way up. She came donw again 2 hours later and left. Minutes after the attack occured.
Just wonder what happened in the room upstairs and if the two incidents are connected.
I know of a few well-dressed and attractive women that goes to the better hotels and spend two hours "talking" in a guys room, too.
Posted 2012-02-11 01:38:12
jayboy, on 2012-02-10 10:45:44, said:
Siripon, on 2012-02-10 07:45:11, said:
Rumour has it Yingluk was meeting a close admirer, but up to now Akeyut hasn't released even an initial!
And so the goverenment's critics -even the intelligent ones - are reduced to this kind of nonsense?
jayboy, on 2012-02-10 10:45:44, said:
Siripon, on 2012-02-10 07:45:11, said:
Rumour has it Yingluk was meeting a close admirer, but up to now Akeyut hasn't released even an initial!
And so the goverenment's critics -even the intelligent ones - are reduced to this kind of nonsense?
Rumour has it k. Abhisit is not involved at all, but a real foreigner with Oxbridge education may, but just may have information regarding this nonsense, hidden somewhere in his Ivory Tower. Stay tuned and watch this site again tomorrow 
#33
hanuman1
Posted 2012-02-11 01:43:07
TAWP, on 2012-02-10 22:27:01, said:
dominique355, on 2012-02-10 16:59:32, said:
In the other English speaking newspaper it was reported that Yingluck came to the Four Seasons Hotel, went up to a room and must have seen Akeyuth on her way up. She came donw again 2 hours later and left. Minutes after the attack occured.
Just wonder what happened in the room upstairs and if the two incidents are connected.
I know of a few well-dressed and attractive women that goes to the better hotels and spend two hours "talking" in a guys room, too.
I bet you do.
Posted 2012-02-11 01:56:37
hanuman1, on 2012-02-11 01:43:07, said:
TAWP, on 2012-02-10 22:27:01, said:
dominique355, on 2012-02-10 16:59:32, said:
In the other English speaking newspaper it was reported that Yingluck came to the Four Seasons Hotel, went up to a room and must have seen Akeyuth on her way up. She came donw again 2 hours later and left. Minutes after the attack occured.
Just wonder what happened in the room upstairs and if the two incidents are connected.
I know of a few well-dressed and attractive women that goes to the better hotels and spend two hours "talking" in a guys room, too.
I bet you do.
Terribly sorry, old chap, but betting is against forum rules 
Edited by rubl, 2012-02-11 01:58:56.
Posted 2012-02-11 02:33:20
Orac, on 2012-02-10 11:05:42, said:
scorecard, on 2012-02-10 11:00:33, said:
JurgenG, on 2012-02-10 08:35:20, said:
And as usual people comment without any knowledge or understanding of the situation 
If my wife were from the north and I met that guy in a public place ...
So perhaps you'd like to set the pace by quoting the said article whatever where he denigrated women.
Is that what he really said? I'm surprised Yingluck managed to restrain herself from giving the obnoxious so-and-so a swift kick in the nether region.
Posted 2012-02-11 02:47:09
Orac, on 2012-02-10 13:41:04, said:
whybother, on 2012-02-10 12:27:26, said:
Interesting. The link is blocked by MICT. I thought the PTP government was against censorship.
Btw: blocked on DTAC
Posted with Thaivisa App http://apps.thaivisa.com
Odd - not blocked on mine which is Sophon Cable via 3bb I believe.
true online has no problem with the prachatai link. Interesting article, some remarks quoted fom k. Akeyuth not really 'politically' correct to say the least.
Posted 2012-02-11 05:58:15
related topic:
PM Yingluck denies misconduct at Bangkok hotel
Full story: http://www.thaivisa....-bangkok-hotel/
|
|
0
