Sponsored by ...
Thailand To Seize Thaksin's Assets
#1
Posted 2006-09-23 00:53
BANGKOK: -- Thailand may seize the assets of ousted premier Thaksin Shinawatra, a self-made telecom tycoon believed to be worth over $2-billion (about R14,6-billion), the new military junta said on Friday.
"It's under consideration on how we will proceed," with Thaksin's vast assets, said air force chief Chalit Pukbhasuk, one of the military leaders who toppled Thaksin in a bloodless coup on Tuesday.
The junta also appointed a new nine-member National Counter Corruption Commission, clearing the way for a probe of the financial affairs of Thaksin, who was staying in London on Friday.
Forbes magazine in July said Thaksin is Thailand's fourth richest businessman with a fortune worth $2,2-billion.
The 56-year-old, who took office in 2001, was the founder of Thailand's telecom giant Shin Corp., which includes the country's top mobile phone company, satellite services and a stake in a budget airline.
His family in January sold a nearly 50-percent stake in Shin Corp. and earned R1,9-billion under a tax-free deal, setting off months of street protests demanding his ousting over alleged abuse of power and corruption.
The commission said Friday that when Thaksin first took office he declared assets worth 15.12 billion baht (about $2,9-billion) held in 27 bank accounts and in stocks in 29 companies and investment funds.
Months after taking office, a top court found Thaksin not guilty on charges that he had failed to disclose full assets to the authority.
Thaksin also owned four houses, 35 buildings and land in Bangkok, in his hometown in northern Chiang Mai province, in the southern tourist resort of Phuket and elsewhere.
He also declared 10 cars including a Porsche and a Ferrari, and stacks of diamonds, rubies, topaz necklaces, rings and watches.
Earlier Friday, the junta expanded the powers of the national police chief, which would make it easier to press ahead with prosecutions against Thaksin and other members of his government.
Thailand's auditor general told local media that she would be ready to complete at least one long-standing corruption investigation into him within days.
The junta has promised to appoint a new civilian government within two weeks, and to draft a new constitution to clear the way for elections in October 2007.
Air chief Chalit said the generals were considering at least five candidates to become the new prime minister, but he declined to reveal their names.
"The new prime minister is likely to be a legal expert because he has to implement constitutional reforms, while his deputies can oversee economic affairs," he said.
"There are more than five people under consideration, and I expect he will be named soon," Chalit said.
-- AFP 2006-09-23
#2
Posted 2006-09-23 01:07
Great move, the previous PM was only a loophole expert.
#3
Posted 2006-09-23 01:10
#4
Posted 2006-09-23 01:18
crocodilexp, on 2006-09-23 01:10:35, said:
The purge must start with the head.
It's only the begining of a process. Do not worry, some eminent members of Thaksin's clique will come under investigation too.
You continue to think that it's only a "little corruption", like a bad thai tradition, a form of "exotism".
No. With Thaksin, and for the first time in the modern history of this country, corruption has reached an industrial level.
We are going to be surprised in the weeks to come... Now that officials can really conduct investigations.
Pongsak (Minister transport), Somchai.... all of them are dirty. Sisters, wife, children, cousins, step brothers of Thaksin... All of them will feel the shame of the caught thieves.
NCCC must do it swiftly. To set an example, a precedent. So future candidates will think twice.
#5
Posted 2006-09-23 01:24
Ex- Senator Galung (not sure about spelling) mentioned that you can expect a minimum of 1000 people to follow Thaksin down the same alley.
#6
Posted 2006-09-23 02:34
Edited by Admin2.
#7
Posted 2006-09-23 02:40
#8
Posted 2006-09-23 02:41
#9
Posted 2006-09-23 03:03
which would leave still very comfortable.
#10
Posted 2006-09-23 03:44
george, on 2006-09-23 00:53:41, said:
Forbes magazine in July said Thaksin is Thailand's fourth richest businessman with a fortune worth R2,2-billion.
Who are the three? The ones richer than him? Would be interesting to know.
....and what is R2,2-billion? Is that Rand, Ruppees, Baht even, or Dollars or Pounds? I'm a multi milllionaire in Vietnam and Italy, really!!!
This post has been edited by VTR1000: 2006-09-23 03:50
#11
Posted 2006-09-23 04:05
snip - Admin2
#12
Posted 2006-09-23 04:08
This forum is subject to the prevailing political situation in Thailand which is detailed in the link in my post above.
We ask that members understand that, for the time being, we have to be careful what is posted on the forum.
#13
Posted 2006-09-23 04:15
#14
Posted 2006-09-23 04:47
Take away his money--now he will fight.
I would.
#15
Posted 2006-09-23 04:57
VTR1000, on 2006-09-23 03:44:12, said:
george, on 2006-09-23 00:53:41, said:
Forbes magazine in July said Thaksin is Thailand's fourth richest businessman with a fortune worth R2,2-billion.
Who are the three? The ones richer than him? Would be interesting to know.
....and what is R2,2-billion? Is that Rand, Ruppees, Baht even, or Dollars or Pounds? I'm a multi milllionaire in Vietnam and Italy, really!!!
It has been Euro in Italy for years already.
Back to the topic. I just read in another newspaper, the Council for Democratic Reform under Constitutional Monarchy (CDRM) said that they have no plan to seize Toxin's asset by themselves. They will let NCCC investigate and take care of that, which I think it's quite generous already, in addition to the fact that they didn't freeze Toxin's accounts from day 1. And as far I know (from newspapers), his accounts are still not locked, which is what I couldn't understand.
I don't think they should just seize all the assets. Only the amount they found that it's not legally obtained should be fair enough, plus calculated interest and fine for damage he caused, of course. That could worth all he has in Thai banks and properties. Somehow I don't think it would make him poor. Poorer than when he was PM, maybe. But while investigating, shouldn't it be safer to freeze the account, especially when the account's owner is now abroad.
#16
#17
Posted 2006-09-23 05:39
#18
Posted 2006-09-23 05:43
Oh well, different strokes for different folks.
#19
Posted 2006-09-23 06:05
VTR1000, on 2006-09-22 13:44:12, said:
george, on 2006-09-23 00:53:41, said:
Forbes magazine in July said Thaksin is Thailand's fourth richest businessman with a fortune worth R2,2-billion.
Who are the three? The ones richer than him? Would be interesting to know.
....and what is R2,2-billion? Is that Rand, Ruppees, Baht even, or Dollars or Pounds? I'm a multi milllionaire in Vietnam and Italy, really!!!
Good point but Italy is on the euro now.
#20
Posted 2006-09-23 06:06
pjallittle, on 2006-09-23 05:54:26, said:
VTR1000, on 2006-09-22 13:44:12, said:
george, on 2006-09-23 00:53:41, said:
Forbes magazine in July said Thaksin is Thailand's fourth richest businessman with a fortune worth R2,2-billion.
Who are the three? The ones richer than him? Would be interesting to know.
....and what is R2,2-billion? Is that Rand, Ruppees, Baht even, or Dollars or Pounds? I'm a multi milllionaire in Vietnam and Italy, really!!!
You will find details about the other three, all wealthier than Thaksin, at the following site:
[link removed by Admin2]
They are, according to Forbes ranking:
214. Charoen Sirivadhanabhakdi, Thailand, 61, $3.2, alcohol
292. Chaleo Yoovidhya, Thailand, 74, $2.5, Red Bull
317. Dhanin Chearavanont and family, Thailand, 66, $2.4, agriculture
Thaksin was clearly a wealthy man before taking office and was taken to court over the stated value of his assets some months after taking office. He was cleared by the courts.
Why do we assume that, because he's rich, that he's a crook? Paul McCartney's a billionaire, is he also corrupted? Bill Clinton was on the verge of bankruptcy but is now a multi-millionaire.
So many critics, I wonder where all of you get your facts.
ํI'm afraid you're comparing apples and oran... 2 1/2 inch screws here.
#21
Posted 2006-09-23 06:35
jhj2000, on 2006-09-22 16:14:25, said:
[snip - Admin2] Being an American I hope the consititution is for and by the people but I am not Thai and it is their call and what works for them is what matters. I understand the censorship rules in effect and what the General is having to do by controlling disent right now. If he is really out for the good of the people then it is all justified and the controls will losen as the dangerous first couple of weeks pass. I think since this is now accepted the danger has mostly past or at least I am hopeful of that. Having said that it is important that censorship and the rule of law take over asap and that is not from a world perspective. It is a historical perspective. The longer militaries stay in power the less likely they are to relinquish it. I think Sonthi really does want the best for his country and at the moment the worlds sensibilities are not high on his priority list. They will be for the interim government to address. I think they will but the proof will be a week or so out when they feel things are stable enough to go back to normal. Thaksin was corrupt but for the coup to have credibility they need to apply the law to more than just Thaksin and his crew. Thaksin is being used as a symbol by Sonthi for the locals but the rest of the world is watching closely. He has a very difficult road to walk as I am sure he knows. He has to appease Thai sentiment but he needs also to show the world that the rule of law prevails above what we want as individuals. Hopefully he can pull this off. Time will tell.
#22
Posted 2006-09-23 06:37
#23
Posted 2006-09-23 06:43
marquess, on 2006-09-22 16:37:25, said:
He owned a lot of property around the new airport. I am sure he will be given immunity in the UK but a lot of his money was already diversified. I doubt he diversified because he was worred about a coup though. He was a smart guy and smart guys don't keep all there eggs in one basket. On top of that he was an eglomaniac so I doubt he ever thought anything this bad could possibly happen to someone like him. Most eglomaniacs view life that way and most evetually find out they aren't as good as they think they are.
#24
Posted 2006-09-23 06:43
Thailand to target deposed PM's assets
BANGKOK: -- Thailand may seize the assets of ousted premier Thaksin Shinawatra, a self-made telecom tycoon believed to be worth over $2-billion (about R14,6-billion), the new military junta said on Friday.
"It's under consideration on how we will proceed," with Thaksin's vast assets, said air force chief Chalit Pukbhasuk, one of the military leaders who toppled Thaksin in a bloodless coup on Tuesday.
The junta also appointed a new nine-member National Counter Corruption Commission, clearing the way for a probe of the financial affairs of Thaksin, who was staying in London on Friday.
Forbes magazine in July said Thaksin is Thailand's fourth richest businessman with a fortune worth $2,2-billion.
The 56-year-old, who took office in 2001, was the founder of Thailand's telecom giant Shin Corp., which includes the country's top mobile phone company, satellite services and a stake in a budget airline.
His family in January sold a nearly 50-percent stake in Shin Corp. and earned R1,9-billion under a tax-free deal, setting off months of street protests demanding his ousting over alleged abuse of power and corruption.
The commission said Friday that when Thaksin first took office he declared assets worth 15.12 billion baht (about $2,9-billion) held in 27 bank accounts and in stocks in 29 companies and investment funds.
============
As that alone is more or less the money he got from selling AIS, what about all that land he directly or indirectly accumulated? One can only guess but likely adding all in, one can likely multiply that number a few times...
#25
Posted 2006-09-23 06:58
Quote
Why do we assume that, because he's rich, that he's a crook? Paul McCartney's a billionaire, is he also corrupted? Bill Clinton was on the verge of bankruptcy but is now a multi-millionaire.
So many critics, I wonder where all of you get your facts.
Not sure adding bill with this argument is a good idea. He escaped his own legal problems ,anyway sounds maybe like a good idea to read more then post under current circumstances....
One thing I notice here in currently sunny Phuket: a lot of people seem to be feeling happy about this all. In addition cleaning up about 5 years of remains of what happened will keep them all busy..
I see really no reason why tourism should get a hit when tourists coming here get no problems, feel happy and see people happy...
I only wonder about one thing. Would it not be a good idea to remove that diplomatic passport?

Help




MultiQuote













