snoop1130

Queen formally approves law giving UK PM May power to trigger EU exit talks

68 posts in this topic

1 hour ago, dick dasterdly said:

To be fair she is a 'thinker' - albeit only for her own personal interests.

Explain?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Laughing Gravy said:

She plays the victim very well, because of her trying to prevent the government from triggering article 50, she can't take public transport.

Sorry, are you saying that she actually cannot take public transport now, or that she pretends that she cannot take it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

Sorry, are you saying that she actually cannot take public transport now, or that she pretends that she cannot take it?

 

Difficult to say Rudy. She's prone to exaggeration. When her Reuters interviewer asked to be shown an example of the vile abuse:

 

"She showed Reuters one email from someone who claimed they would have invested money with SCM, which has about 100 million pounds in its portfolios, but had been deterred because of her legal action.

"You are obviously a devious lady," the email read."

 

Of course, Gina had deleted the really nasty ones, like one does when one is about to make a complaint to the police about them.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, RuamRudy said:

Sorry, are you saying that she actually cannot take public transport now, or that she pretends that she cannot take it?

She said she can't take public transport because people hate her for what she is doing. I am saying someone of here wealth probably never took it in the first place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Khun Han said:

 

Difficult to say Rudy. She's prone to exaggeration. When her Reuters interviewer asked to be shown an example of the vile abuse:

 

"She showed Reuters one email from someone who claimed they would have invested money with SCM, which has about 100 million pounds in its portfolios, but had been deterred because of her legal action.

"You are obviously a devious lady," the email read."

 

Of course, Gina had deleted the really nasty ones, like one does when one is about to make a complaint to the police about them.

Are you saying the subsequent arrests that took place is fake

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Laughing Gravy said:

You know she may have a higher IQ who knows. I always believe IQ is over rated. Once again you are wrong I despise her arrogance and the fact that she has the audacity, to tell people they do not know what they voted for. I know those who voted for remain what they voted for, as those who voted leave. Saying they are stupid and uneducated is disgraceful and I have not come anyone with her utter contempt for people, since reading your posts here.

You despise her for apparently saying people did not know what they was voting for, but offer nothing to counter this

Was it the NHS money

Point style immigration

EU citizens indefinite leave

 

Cannot have been to reclaim sovereignty , after  fighting to the bitter end to deprive parliament

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, rockingrobin said:

You despise her for apparently saying people did not know what they was voting for, but offer nothing to counter this

Was it the NHS money

Point style immigration

EU citizens indefinite leave

 

Cannot have been to reclaim sovereignty , after  fighting to the bitter end to deprive parliament

If you can't be bothered to read about what she said and why, then I really will not waste any keyboard time on the women. Some posters have already given links to this.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Laughing Gravy said:

She said she can't take public transport because people hate her for what she is doing. I am saying someone of here wealth probably never took it in the first place.

If true, this is hugely disturbing - have we learnt nothing from the horrible events of last year? It is one thing disagreeing with someone, but for that person to feel unsafe in public because of fear of attack over their personal and legally held opinion is something about which we should all feel disgusted.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Laughing Gravy said:

You know she may have a higher IQ who knows. I always believe IQ is over rated. Once again you are wrong I despise her arrogance and the fact that she has the audacity, to tell people they do not know what they voted for. I know those who voted for remain what they voted for, as those who voted leave. Saying they are stupid and uneducated is disgraceful and I have not come anyone with her utter contempt for people, since reading your posts here.

I think your position is quite clear. You have no time for people who disagree with you, for people you believe to have a higher IQ than you, for people you believe to be more intelligent than you. OK, fine. I'm sure you're correct. You'll excuse me if I stay with the arrogant remainers. 😉

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, rockingrobin said:

Are you saying the subsequent arrests that took place is fake

 

I am saying that she is prone to exaggeration (as stated in my post to which you replied, which you must have missed).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Khun Han said:

 

I am saying that she is prone to exaggeration (as stated in my post to which you replied, which you must have missed).

On what basis are you making this  ' prone to exaggeration ' statement ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, rockingrobin said:

On what basis are you making this  ' prone to exaggeration ' statement ?

 

On the basis of the Reuters interview that I linked, and another interview where she was suggesting that most of her co-claimants had dropped out of the claim because of personal abuse, when the truth was that it was a simple legal procedure to combine the claims.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Khun Han said:

 

On the basis of the Reuters interview that I linked, and another interview where she was suggesting that most of her co-claimants had dropped out of the claim because of personal abuse, when the truth was that it was a simple legal procedure to combine the claims.

So without any  evidence  contrary to the abuse , and in light of the courts comments and action with regards the abuse. The police advice and subsequent arrests , you conclude G.Miller is prone to exaggeration .

One of the claimants did not attend the SC ruling due to the level of abuse

I think it is you yourself exaggerating    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, rockingrobin said:

So without any  evidence  contrary to the abuse , and in light of the courts comments and action with regards the abuse. The police advice and subsequent arrests , you conclude G.Miller is prone to exaggeration .

One of the claimants did not attend the SC ruling due to the level of abuse

I think it is you yourself exaggerating    

 

No, Gina Miller highlights her own exaggerations. I don't need to enhance them, I only have to reference them. But, nice try at obfuscation. Are you a lawyer?

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, worgeordie said:

They are going to make it as difficult as possible for the UK,to

deter any other EU countries jumping a sinking ship.

It the EU (Common Market) had of just stayed as that,things would

have been great,but they wanted more and more integration,more

laws,regulations, and this divorce settlement of Billions they are 

expecting,just tell them to EUCK off

regards Worgeordie

Quite apart from the UK telling the EU to f... off over the EU claim that 50/60 bn is owed for future obligations - I thought this would be more than offset by the UK's share of EU assets?

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

BANGKOK 24 March 2017 17:08
Sponsors