Find content
Not Telling
houseinbkk, on 2012-05-14 23:39:33, said:
Mossfinn, on 2012-05-14 03:19:51, said:
houseinbkk, on 2012-05-14 01:32:58, said:
PS Fair play to Barton for flooring that Tevez if anyone deserves an elbow to the face its that little cnut (Im sure Man City fans will agree)
So you are suggesting that elbowing one player, scraping his boots down another, pretending to throw the head at Kompany ( maybe wrong player ) is acceptable sporting behaviour, when more importantly your team, your fans and your employers are fighting for survival?
Fair play to you, sport and intelligience is alive and well in football.
but no i said Tevez deserved a slap, and if youd listened to short term memory ManCity fans they were saying far worse recently, some were even saying they wouldnt go again if he played.
And as for the comparison with Man U.
I firstly cant see how people even debate that their isnt a huge difference.
Man U generate their own money, as do Spurs, Arsenal and Newcastle.
Teams such as Man City or Chelsea have ruined the game by buying trophies without getting their clubs in order, Man City had potentail to challenge at the top but the went the cheats route,(they did have a crop of cracking young ENGLISH players that had their chance taken away) i for one was gutted ManU didnt win the league.
After recently visiting that part of the world, the rulers are nothing other then dicators of the lowest order, such a pity we even trade with them.
Just remind me again, you think that individuals with lots of money spending money on a hobby of their choice because they have money, is worse sporting behaviour than a professional being paid lots of money to keep his team, his club, his supporters in the premier league, whilst elbowing one player, dragging his studs down the back of another and attempting to throw the head at another, is the preferred option?
We all have more money than certain others in this world, and others would look at certain actions as immoral because of the use of money, how do you spend yours, would it stand close moral scrutiny?
