trainman34014, on 2012-04-25 20:41:28, said:
Personally I don't think there will be bad floods this year because we just haven't had anything like the rain in the North that we had already had by this time last year. Last year it started raining on March 1st and rained almost every other day in large volumes until October. All that water ran South and became the top up for what had already accumulated there. This year it has barely rained at all yet.
In the final analysis nature will decide the issue and if there are no floods it will certainly not be due to the efforts of the current Government. Of course if there are no floods we all know that they will be congratulating themselves for a magnificent job done !
In the final analysis nature will decide the issue and if there are no floods it will certainly not be due to the efforts of the current Government. Of course if there are no floods we all know that they will be congratulating themselves for a magnificent job done !
It would seem that neither did the powers that be consider it a problem, or as was the rumour, had not the will to stop it or the power to lessen its severity.
I think that we should be happy that the rains are likely to be less this year and that if not, that the government has the means and the will not to let the floods happen again to the same extent.
I got the impression that some people actually wanted Bangkok to be disrupted and that for those who camped in the capital before, it was considered divine intervention in support of their's and what they consider the government's main task.





Find content
Male

