fletchsmile, on 2012-03-07 16:05:03, said:
topt, on 2012-03-07 12:44:13, said:
fletchsmile, on 2012-03-06 21:33:34, said:
1) Thai LTFs (great tax relief and only 5 year limits to full access)
2) Thai RMFS if close to retirement are a bit more flexible than UK pensions as you can take it all as a lump sum tax free at 55
You and I come from an era where pensions used to make sense. For many people these days there are often better options, especially as an expat. Pensions aren't what they used to be, and the trend is getting worse.... So consider whether to avoid the whole QROPs / pension debate in the first place
2) Thai RMFS if close to retirement are a bit more flexible than UK pensions as you can take it all as a lump sum tax free at 55
You and I come from an era where pensions used to make sense. For many people these days there are often better options, especially as an expat. Pensions aren't what they used to be, and the trend is getting worse.... So consider whether to avoid the whole QROPs / pension debate in the first place
Fletchsmile can you elaborate on what exactly you mean by LTFs and RMFS?
I agree wholehartedly with you last comment but unfortunately only really aware of it in the recent past.
LTF = Long Term Equity Fund. RMF = Retirement Mutual Fund. Both are products here in Thailand, which can be used to save money. They both give tax relief at your marginal rate of tax, similar to contributions to a UK pension getting tax relief. LTFs need to be held for 5 calendar years, RMFs like pensions need to be held to 55. The big advantage of both is the whole pot is yours tax free after the 5 year (LTF) or 55 years old RMF. No requirement to buy annuities or income drawdown.
Following link would be useful, and it would be worth you doing a search on other threads on here on TV, as it comes up from time to time
http://www.ingfunds....rted_RMFLTF.asp
I haven't looked into either in detail yet but you would not be able to export a UK Pension into either product as HMRC would not allow you to draw your pension as a 100% commutation when their rules clearly state that 70% must be used to provide an income for life.
I know you weren't suggesting this but just bringing it back into the context of the thread.




Find content
Not Telling
