Find content
Male
jayboy, on 2011-07-13 10:57:14, said:
animatic, on 2011-07-13 09:57:10, said:
Bottom line Thaksin sees the 2007 charter as:
Having checks and balances he can't get around
So by going back to the '97 he can in someways reset the clock on several cases against him
And he will be back to his old level of control, which is exactly why they wrote the 2007.
There was a referendum and the public picked the '97. Yes. or No.
But he didn't get to control the referendum situation so he wants to redo.
Having checks and balances he can't get around
So by going back to the '97 he can in someways reset the clock on several cases against him
And he will be back to his old level of control, which is exactly why they wrote the 2007.
There was a referendum and the public picked the '97. Yes. or No.
But he didn't get to control the referendum situation so he wants to redo.
The call for the restoration of the excellent 1997 constitution - or something very similar - has been called for by many across the political spectrum.
The junta's constitution was written to please the military and other non elected elite elements.The referendum passed not least because the military imposed government had made it clear it would be promulgated no matter what.Even so the close call in the popular vote was a slap in the face to the elite thugs.
well said!
