scorecard, on 2012-03-02 08:19:06, said:
jonclark, on 2012-03-02 07:15:56, said:
Incoherent ramblings that make no sense what so ever. The admin team at TV need to do a much better job at screening content before posting. This artical is just nonsene. Ikea flat pack instructions make for better reading!
Ever heard of freedom of speech:
- The right for all persons, the media etc., to express their views, their opinion, their analysis, without intimidation?
- The right for all persons to have open and free access to what others say, without intimidation?
Seeing as I post my thoughts on a forum I clearly understand freedom of speech thank you vey much. I was just expressing my view, opinion and my analysis of the artical which you have open and free access to.
However when articles make sweeping unfounded atatements such as
"The foreign interests - the foreign media, foreign governments and foreign institutions - have been active players in this dialectical process in Thailand. They support the "poor" against the "rich Bangkokians". They back the phrai against the ammart. They promote "democracy" against "military dictatorship". They support media freedom against censorship, even though the thousands of websites sprouting up against the monarchy are loaded with obscene language. And finally, they are in favour of amending the lese majeste law so that anybody can attack the monarchy freely."
it annoys the backside off me as the writer has looked at the values of the west (democracty, media freedom etc) , twisted them without a shred of evidence and used these twisted values, presented as truth, to suggest that foreign interests are active in unsurping of power from the legitimate owners of Thailand and presents it as some form of foriegn backed conspiracay theory with the PAD as the knights in shining armour to resuce Thailand. A balance reasonable account supported by evidence ok, But this is gutter journalism as its worst. But hey that's just my opinion





Find content
Male
Posted
