coconutmonkey

TrippRitter, on 2011-05-02 13:38:55, said:

Agreed.  Well said.

As for this whole topic:

It's okay to say: "burn in hell" to a human, regardless of what you THINK you know about him (what you have been fed, that is).

It's not okay to say:  Obama gets a massive election boost, no other country was involved in the raid, the body was disposed of rather quickly (again), there is no evidence of the death, look at what happened with election results concerning Bill Clinton and Ricky Roy Rector

<snip>

Justice has been done? What for the million people killed by the US in the middle east after chasing him around for a decade?  What about the billions of dollars that could have been spent on health, recovery from natural disasters and so forth?  Justice???  For those who want their poppy fields and oil wells.... the ones with all the answers, and the motive too.  But of course, it's easier just to say no to anything other than the world is flat.

The world is safe now!  He's dead!  

After spending billions of dollars over a decade blowing up countries and killing people, they have caught him!  

No more trouble in the world!  Peace again with the UN, US and NATO in charge!  

Very intelligent work! Only a few crappy videos to know what he looks like, and even identified him after shot in the head.  I guess the beard gave it away...

Now they can get back to blowing up the middle east looking for terrorists....


Iran is a terrorist nation!  Let's blow them up!!!!

Is there an election coming up soon???

astral, on 2011-03-16 17:06:19, said:

This is not entirely true.  There is much misinformation concerning iodine by industry (for profit).  I will list some of these, but the topic is massive.

1) Iodine assists in protection against ALL sex hormone related cancers.  This means cancers which occur as a result of progesterone production: not progesterone per se, but cortisol, testosterone and estrogen which are synthesized in the body from progesterone.  This includes prostrate cancer, thyroid, breast, cervical, ovarian,etc.  This is why, typically, before the mass adoption of western fast food into Japanese culture, Japanese people were low in cancers, particularly sex cancers due to their high intake of seaweed and seafood (which contains high levels of iodine).  Iodine regulates endocrine hormone production from progesterone.  
2) This will never be supported by mainstream health care/hospitals, and that is why some will say "we never knew iodine can help breast cancer!" Of course, it cannot be patented/copyright, and treatments such as surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy fleece you of much more money to support the economy/hospitals and pharmaceutical companies  than a naturally occurring molecule from seawater/seaweed and marine sources.  Hemp again is another classic example of this industry manipulation.    
3) radioactive iodine-131 (which means it is an isotope of iodine) does not in fact cure any cancer.  That is false; it is used to destroy overactive thyroid glands; the idea that if you are hyperthyroid, then killing part of it will suppress it to regular working levels.  Treatment from Iodine-131 will cause greater problems relating to metabolism in the future; the key ingredient for cancer, as metabolism affects oxygen assimilation and necrosis of cells resulting in cancer suppression or growth.  This basically means that while it may appear, and be touted (even used) as a cure, those who undergo treatment will find themselves likely to develop sex-hormone related cancers further down the line because of the disruption to metabolism.
4) KI (potassium iodine) is not the same as I2 (elemental iodine).  KI is water soluble, meaning it can be excreted, however elemental iodine is fat soluble, meaning it stores in body fat.  KI contains I2, and this is the only reason it cannot be taken in excess (huge excess, that is).  It is rather quite safe under normal uses.  Therefore, it is necessary to ingest iodine regularly.  
5) Noting this, the RDI (recommended daily intake) of iodine is far too low than the correct dosage, and the amount added to table salt likewise is inadequate for proper iodine thyroid levels.
6)  Not only this, but as iodine is a halogen (group 17) with a higher atomic mass than fluorine (toothpaste, water), bromine (breads, etc) and chlorine (water), then iodine is easily displaced causing a deficiency.  Furthermore, phytoestrogens (e.eg., in soy products, etc) bind to iodine molecules disabling proper assimilation by the thyroid, again increasing chances of deficiency.    This is the reason for high occurance of goiter and cretinism of inland Chinese who consume soy products and live long distances from coastal iodine rich sources of food.
7) Interestingly, IQ is also affected by iodine.

The other choice is to shell out all your money for toxic cancer treatments (no one fares well with chemo or radiotherapy, and surgery is butchery...), and follow mainstream thinking "beware of every disease and virus!".  It just doesn't work, there are too many; the wiser choice is to strengthen your immune system so it doesn't become prone to attack by pathogens.  Iodine assists greatly with immune system functioning, as that is a primary role of the thyroid gland.

That's an intro. Hope it helps.  

Of course you may ask your doctor and until you mention anything about radioactivity, he will tell you KI cannot be ingested because it is a poison (as it says on the bottle); as it is used to swab infections topically and pre-surgery and used in bacteriology.  However, paper is a poison too if you eat too much, and for example, what could be worse than soy or ice-cream?  Industry for profit is the criminal.  

Cancer is industry (big money IS made!), as are pharmaceutical companies, and all their derivatives; hospitals, doctors and the like who must follow suit.

Disclaimer:  Of course!  This is not intended to be or replace medical information or advice from your family doctor. :-)

wooty, on 2010-11-18 19:32:18, said:

Very good points to bring up...

I think this is a very bright post.

ciaociao, on 2010-11-05 16:03:23, said:

Yes, that's it again.  Both ciaociao and kuffki have very, very valid points.  

Of course, those who defend idiot-ism, put your rose glasses back on and tell us to leave.

That's the only suggestion you've ever had to improve Thailand.  Clearly criticism towards improvement, understanding and awareness is not your idea of an improvement.