jaidee

At Grand Diamond, all maintenance fee's remain the same. We condo owners are getting only all the mess, the developer the benefits !
Among others, the situation continue to escalate, visitors are now walking, uncontrolled,  up the 8/F swimming pool, as now part of the 8/F Building B, is labeled Grand Diamond Plaza Shopping mall Office.
Visitors leaving their Starbucks mess at the 8/F for residents enjoyment. Daily whistling contest of the security guards. Laundry Shop installed at Building B 8/F.
Daily, goods are being moved in the personal lifts of 8/F Building B.
At purchase time it was clearly mentioned that 8/F was clearly labeled "child care"
And Building A 8/F Office NOT Building B !!!!
Safety and Security, as predicted initially, is declining in our building.

Grand Diamond Developer, Petboonma,  continues abuse, has also taken up recently part of Ground Floor Building B to install Grand Diamond Renting Office !!!
As they have complete control over Juristic, as a matter of fact the Juristic Manager is a .... Grand Diamond Project Manager !
Get this...any Grand Diamond Plaza visitor can visit the office Building B 8/F private floor...but owners cannot have their pizza delivered at their floor...for security reasons !

Update court cases, initiated by the developer against myself,....court case 1 "stealing property" was dropped by the judge, as I did NOT stealed the Plaza posters, but rather, removed them from our residence entry view ! More than propably the court case 2 insult case will be dropped also. (the lady who initiated the court case....has been in the meanwhile dismissed for $$$ theft from building management ....!!!).  Hope that the court case 3 destruction case also will be dropped on the grounds that Juridistics didn't handle after several verbal and certified mails requests.

Case is being also escalated to the Thai consumer organization, but sofar, after 2 years, no result whatsoever !

The developer owns over 33 % of all property, so it is extremely difficult to obtain a majority !
Also unity is lacking in the building as the majority Thai owners, although very much enjoyed with the situation, don't want to rock the boat, as this is very..."unthai"....May pen Rai.....
The point here is that Residential property was changed to Commercial property, What was presented and made to believe a purchase time as common property was changed to private property, how can this be ????

Condo Purchaser is clearly not protected in Thailand. First priority is to get legal, affortable assistance to kick the developper's Grand Diamond Plaza Office  out of the private owned Building B 8/F, relocating him as per purchase plan to the Hotel Building A 8/F.

Joined by a bilingual senior member of our “No Grand Diamond Plaza” opposition group I visited the police station.
The Project developer was identified as the complaining party in regard with the removed advertisements.
Requested for fingerprints, we asked and obtained a waiting period,  during which, we will negotiate that either the project developer drops his complaint or to identify and return to the police station with proper legal representation.
On another note, if it is proven that the property developer can not claim ownership of the 8/F Tower B, as per brochures upon condominium purchase time, then, it can be claimed that the posters removal reflect this reality, and therefore completely legal.

Thanks you for your utmost useful information, will contact the said organizations.
As a novice I had no clue where to start for assistance.
FYI, poster  removal happened at the reception of my apartment (private area), following up a registered letter send two weeks before, but not answered by, our Juristic management.
Poster, I believe, is an illegal invitation to a private 8/F common area, for the general public.
By removing the poster I only had  the intention to protect the residents families.
Understand, I am on thin ice !

In this regard, I need legal assistance speaking Thai to visit the police station with me to respond to a "property destruction claim" from the developper( posters I removed from the developper).
Any suggestions ?

As Hotel owner, Petboonma Co Ltd has automatically 33% of the votes Tower A (Hotel). Furthermore he and some of his staff owns also condo's at tower B and an nbr of condo's, unknown to us, is unsold. Therefor, Petboonma can reach a 50% of the votes based on AREA ownership. It is not one mean one vote that's being promoted, for it's own benefit, by Juristic department.
But even then, I strongly believe that,
1. You cannot change overnight a residential to a commercial area by transforming more than 50 % of the parking space in a shopping mall because the property developper would like to see his profits increase. (on the back of the condominium owners).
2. You cannot change what was originally announced, advertised and planned as common area at building B, by claiming later on that it is the property development property.

On both counts, regardless, there is clearly without a shadow of a doubt serious inconveniences and financial ramifications for the residents opposed to property developper Petboona Co Ltd., for it's ONLY and sole financial greed , plans without a SINGLE benefit to it's condominium owners.