Baytur, on Yesterday, 13:28 , said:
I've cruised at 165kph indicated which was just short of 150kph on the GPS, on the CBR250R.
I found the fairings were certainly welcome while cruising at this speed for a few hours.
Can others who feel the CBR250R doesn't need fairings explain the disadvantage of having them at 150kph?
I read those with the Er-6n find it uncomfortable cruising at 140kph (isn't that 10% optimistic speedo?, so really only 126kph-ish?), so I cannot see how cruising at a real 150kph on a naked bike would be comfortable... especially compared to having those sexy, ultra-cool and well designed CBR250R fairings.
I found the fairings were certainly welcome while cruising at this speed for a few hours.
Can others who feel the CBR250R doesn't need fairings explain the disadvantage of having them at 150kph?
I read those with the Er-6n find it uncomfortable cruising at 140kph (isn't that 10% optimistic speedo?, so really only 126kph-ish?), so I cannot see how cruising at a real 150kph on a naked bike would be comfortable... especially compared to having those sexy, ultra-cool and well designed CBR250R fairings.
Cruised or been flat out at 165kmh. You must be lightweight because most I've managed is 150 but that was upright and I'm not exactly light
sent from my Wellcom A90+





Find content
Male
