DickFarang

Jingthing, on 2012-03-31 18:17:02, said:

Jingthing

When did you have your circumcision? To be accurate you have to talk to men who had their foreskin intact and had already some years Sex and than did for whatever  reason a circumcision. These men you can ask, if they like it now more with or without foreskin.

Jingthing, on 2012-03-31 21:43:22, said:

Google Joshua and ask his mum if he should have been clipped! They nicked an artery, he died very soon after, she remembers the pain every day. And............there are many more many died, many many missing the top of the glans (yeah, more sensitive sex eh). Seems you are happy with giving people a choice for everything apart from Male Genital Mutilation. Stick a hook and weights through it when you are 18 if you want Jingthing, but until then, leave them as God made them eh!

The Fairy sect is somewhere between the Mormons and Scientologists.

BWPattaya, on 2012-03-31 17:20:59, said:

I am well aware of the surgical need that you have given an example of. My original post really is very clear. At no point am I even hinting that a surgical process done out of a medical necessity is wrong. I have been writing about the removal of the foreskin on a new born baby by some old Rabbi because of an alleged 3000 year old religious reason. I hope that is crystal clear now, to yourself and the poster that wants to inform us of his rolling in and swelling foreskin after heavy sex sessions.  

WHY???????????? In a whole big world full of women; why would you want to get involved with a muslim women?

flap48, on 2012-03-31 15:43:06, said:

You are the one that is applying a very rare condition to a general situation. I am not discussing what you wish to do as an adult, that is your choice, I am stating that to cut the foreskin off a child who has absolutely no say in the matter is child abuse. I would love to see a poll on Thai visa to see how many men have had to go to the Doctor to clean under their foreskin after sex. Whilst that may have been an issue for you, I imagine 99 men in 100 would reply in the negative. Jeez!

With so many fish in the sea, only a fool would choose to eat the poisonous one.

travelmann, on 2012-03-30 19:27:28, said:

Circumcision is carried out on 'people' who have no choice in the decision. It is child abuse, plain and simple, We are supposed to believe that God has made us as he wants us, yet got it wrong with the foreskin. Having a foreskin makes absolutely zero difference to the effort required to ensure your private parts remain clean.

Foot binding was aesthetically pleasing in China for over 400 years. Sadly the small girls who had their feet broken and bound to look 'pleasing' had no choice in the matter...child abuse. Circumcision...child abuse, the difference is the small baby having his foreskin cut off by an aging rabbi cannot scream 'that bloody hurts a lot stop it'!

Circumcision does not lower cancer rates! It is found that circumcised men have a 15% less chance of contracting prostate cancer providing they are circumcised before sex. It is absolute nonsense to consider that having your foreskin cut off prevents cancer of the prostate. The correlation is that most circumcised men are Jewish or Muslim, therefore most do not eat pork and never have done since childhood. It follows that pork may well be the culprit and infact the statistic should simply read men who eat pork have a 15% greater chance of contracting prostate cancer than men who do not.

Lower HIV rates...no, maybe it is higher than circumcised men because those circumcised have lost their 'penile pleasure zone' as Jingthing eloquently puts it.

Mods, whilst this subject has appeared on this thread I do not believe it is off topic and would ask it remains as there is a very important message here, and that is the use of an ancient religious belief is not satisfactory grounds for condoning the continued practice of child abuse aka cutting off parts of the body belonging to the genitalia.


Jingthing said yesterday at 22.39

Quote

Correct, and that includes circumcision.

007

I feel you are embarking on this just out of curiosity and to say you would be clipped just to satisfy that curiosity is mind boggling. You are knowingly messing with the feelings of a girl that has a completely different cultural base. You have the potential to do great harm to her if you do not consider your actions carefully. this is not a bar girl!

Ask her if she's willing to convert to Christianity. If she says no then forget it. Why should the man be the one to make sacrifices?

An entire thread an nobody mentioned polygamy?

I am sorry but there is nothing about this backward religion ,that has a phrophet who was married to a six year old girl and consumated it when she was 9 that would for a moment get me to join it .

Quote

Isn't one of their bunch the mayor of Pattaya.  I think this is definitely a case of barking up the wrong tree.  They probably appreciate the advertising.