I mean how could an electricity socket covered in water be so dangerous
Power goes to ground. It probably entered where he touched the outlet box and the electricity traveled to where he touched the ground going through his upper body and heart. Even small voltages can disrupt the electrical currents of your heart and even if you don't die right away, you can pass in your sleep later that day.
Electricians in America are required to spend the night in the hospital with EKG attached when even the slightest current goes through their upper body.
Sad and totally unnecessary if better safety standards were followed.
- Thailand Forum
- → Viewing Profile: Posts: Maxxamum
Community Stats
- Group Members
- Active Posts 25
- Profile Views 814
- Member Title Member
- Age Age Unknown
- Birthday Birthday Unknown
-
Gender
Not Telling
Contact Information
0
Neutral
User Tools
Friends
Maxxamum hasn't added any friends yet.
Latest Visitors
Posts I've Made
In Topic: 20-Year-Old Briton Electrocuted To Death On Bangla Road, Phuket
2011-08-26 01:02:23
In Topic: Ratchaprasong Ploy Helped Democrats Hold Most Of Bangkok
2011-07-04 21:27:43
ballpoint, on 2011-07-04 12:37:29, said:
hammered, on 2011-07-04 12:19:29, said:
ballpoint, on 2011-07-04 12:14:03, said:
The precedent has been set by the reds. Just get 100,000 people in the middle of Bangkok, burn a few red supporting businesses out, lob grenades at anyone who tries to peacefully break it up, end up by shooting at people taking shelter in a temple, blame it all on the army and give yourself an amnesty. No coup required.
The red precedent as you describe it didnt achieve government change, and after a let the people decide election in which the people have decided and against those who offered the election and hoped to win, it is going to be hard to do anything to stymie the new government and not face a backlash you cant control.
Probably trying to force loads of coalition allies in to destabilise the government from the outset is one thing but PTP may this time be savvy enough to keep it minimal and have potential to bring in new in place of old later.
No, what the reds did was change the perception of the government and prevent them from concentrating on running the country. I guarantee that the sight of a repeat of last year's violence would not do the PTP any favours. Not that I'm advocating such a scenario.... yet. I'd like to see the PTP being allowed to get on with implementing their policies and forget about trying to bring Thaksin back immediately. Have a look at what they are doing in a year's time. How many of their policies have actually got off the ground, or are even looking like taxiing to the runway. Remind the voters of what was promised. Point out any changes, to the better or worse, in human rights, media freedom, living standards in the poorer parts of the country and corruption. If the balance sheet is in the red (no pun intended), then fire up the protests. After all, if this election was all about change, and the PTP lied to us about what they will be changing, then the people have a right to demand why. Until we see how this works out it is really a waste of time, and more than a little foolish, to be trumpeting the joys of victory or the gloom of defeat.
This has really been quite interesting dating back to the Red Shirt rallies and campaign stumping all over the North. I was up in Udon for a few weeks visiting my wife's family who are all Red Shirts. Regarding Thaksin's conviction for fraud, well since everybody 'eats money' why be so hard on him? This is the sentiment I found most prevalent...like 99.99% of the time among family members. But bringing back Thaksin will most assuredly increase the price for Euca because when he was PM the price was higher, and under Abhisit, the price dropped. Never mind the stale worldwide economy and the fact business needs less paper products in support of a less-active business. And somehow Abhisit got into the street light pole business because when he became PM the cost of those went up costing the government more money every time they buy one. So Abhisit is 'eating money' too but being a bit more sneaky as to how he does it. The implication was that he somehow profited from the price increase. So being a Red Shirt is like being part of a flight of doves. One turns right, they all turn right...one turns left, they all turn left. Never mind whether the leader actually knows where he is going, the rest just follow the guy ahead of him. When the village leader speaks, they all believe and independent thinking seemed pretty much non-existent. Proud to be Red, vote Red, support Red because being Yellow among family members only brings trouble. And when I compared Red and Yellow to Republicans and Democrats and explained how they attempt to work together to run America, they said "Impossible" because all the Yellows must go and cannot be part of the new ALL RED Thailand. So the future will be just as interesting to follow.
In Topic: Outgoing Thai PM Abhisit Resigns As Party Leader
2011-07-04 20:47:28
afarang, on 2011-07-04 11:25:38, said:
kurnell, on 2011-07-04 11:07:55, said:
If nothing else, he looked and sounded good when interviewed by international press. That chap with his own cooking show couldn't even grunt in English
What country do you think this is?Just to inform you, this country is called Thailand .Its National language is Thai. That means there is no demand that to hold political office in this country or any other country where English is not the national language ,, you must be fluent in English.
Bringing your country forward in the world and working in the International community demands the ability to communicate in English which is the worldwide denominator of communication. Speaking only in your native tongue promotes isolationism and says a great deal about the depth of knowledge, education, and interest in moving the country to become a contributing member of the global community and global economy.
In Topic: Can Thai Society Ever Be Freed Of Corruption?
2011-06-28 21:40:03
Considering the people and events that must take place to successfully prosecute someone for fraud, the question I have concerns whether the legal system in Thailand could support the effort. I just reviewed some of the trial notes and commentary on the Rod Blagojevich Trial and his eventual conviction 5 years later
and wonder if this could, in the best of times, happen in Thailand. Considering the number of people that were involved in the approval for wire tapping, the time and care it took in gathering the evidence, the number of people involved in the case that kept all this quiet until just before the arrest, the number of witnesses that were interviewed, and the number of Federal attorneys and scribes that were involved in preparing the case all seem substantial. At the core of this is the public and political intolerance for graft and greed something that Thailand seems to lack. And even if someone tried to prosecute a case like this, who along the way would 'lose' evidence or pay for witnesses or disrupt the process for personal gain? Would the effort have the determination to see it through or would it fall apart somewhere along the way?
and wonder if this could, in the best of times, happen in Thailand. Considering the number of people that were involved in the approval for wire tapping, the time and care it took in gathering the evidence, the number of people involved in the case that kept all this quiet until just before the arrest, the number of witnesses that were interviewed, and the number of Federal attorneys and scribes that were involved in preparing the case all seem substantial. At the core of this is the public and political intolerance for graft and greed something that Thailand seems to lack. And even if someone tried to prosecute a case like this, who along the way would 'lose' evidence or pay for witnesses or disrupt the process for personal gain? Would the effort have the determination to see it through or would it fall apart somewhere along the way?
In Topic: Smoking 3rd Most Risky Factor Behind Deaths In Thailand, After Unsafe Sex And...
2011-05-27 13:25:43
I am not quite sure if smokers really like smoking and have no desire to quit or are addicted so strongly that they cannot quit thus assert their right to smoke more fervently. In today's info-world, information about the perils of smoking is everywhere. A friend of mine sells heart valves etc to heart surgeons and says the symptoms are classic. Immune system failures, chronic disease, plumbing all going downhill, major organ deterioration all leading to death because of the many years of immune suppression. People who smoke look older on the outside, can you wonder what they look like on the inside? Although the lungs are pretty resilient and can recover after a few years of non-smoking, the rest of the body pretty much stays messed up. I have a family of doctors and nurses and I hear that a lot. But when you look at the production numbers from Big Tobacco, they are on a steep increase. Their new target is under-developed countries. Sure why not? Hook the stupid, the ignorant, and the poor and kill thousands more in the interest of stock holder dividends.
The history channel did a small video that is now on YouTube about cigarette manufacturing. 1/3 of the content of a cigarette is old tobacco that has passed the shelf life and is returned and ground up again and added to the mix. 1/3 is new tobacco. And 1/3 is the junk they sweep up off the floor. They mix the old tobacco and the floor-sweepings into a slurry with a bunch of chemicals then spread the liquid onto thin paper. It passes through a dryer and the dried slurry and paper is chopped up and mixed into the blend. And in 1990 when slow-burn cigarette paper was mandated here in the USA to keep people from falling asleep and burning themselves up, many more chemicals (around 60 as I read it) were added to the already hundreds of chemicals that are smoked with every cigarette. I read there are 4,000 chemicals from tobacco. Some you naturally get when you burn organic material and the rest are added in by Big Tobacco. And they are not required by FDA to list the chemicals either.
Hell, if you want to get a buzz, just suck on a tuk tuk exhaust pipe, there are probably fewer chemicals to deal with!
The history channel did a small video that is now on YouTube about cigarette manufacturing. 1/3 of the content of a cigarette is old tobacco that has passed the shelf life and is returned and ground up again and added to the mix. 1/3 is new tobacco. And 1/3 is the junk they sweep up off the floor. They mix the old tobacco and the floor-sweepings into a slurry with a bunch of chemicals then spread the liquid onto thin paper. It passes through a dryer and the dried slurry and paper is chopped up and mixed into the blend. And in 1990 when slow-burn cigarette paper was mandated here in the USA to keep people from falling asleep and burning themselves up, many more chemicals (around 60 as I read it) were added to the already hundreds of chemicals that are smoked with every cigarette. I read there are 4,000 chemicals from tobacco. Some you naturally get when you burn organic material and the rest are added in by Big Tobacco. And they are not required by FDA to list the chemicals either.
Hell, if you want to get a buzz, just suck on a tuk tuk exhaust pipe, there are probably fewer chemicals to deal with!
- Thailand Forum
- → Viewing Profile: Posts: Maxxamum
- Privacy Policy
- Forum Rules ·




Find content
