Jump to content

Listen to Pattaya FM105

View New Content  

Snig27's Photo


Snig27

Member Since 2009-10-05
Offline Last Active 2011-11-25 10:02
-----

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Afghanistan: More than 60 Taliban killed in attack on NATO base

2011-11-12 11:35:19

View PostBeechboy, on 2011-11-10 16:26:20, said:

Before the Taliban rule , Afganistan was a peaceful, relatively prosperous but factious country that was progressing at it's own rate and in it's own way. There was no hostility towards adopting Western standards  such as dress or entertaiment. Schooling was becoming more widespread, for both sexes and old taboos were being eroded, although slowly. Kabul, in particular was developing all the facilities associated with a modern capital.


Nonsense. Before the Taliban the country had been in a long, continuous bloody and brutal civil war. The region (I won't say country because it wasn't one) was a series of warlord controlled fiefdoms who were equally as nasty as the Taliban. One of the reasons the Taliban was initially popular (and indeed still is in huge parts - likely the bulk - of the country) is that they offered a way out of this. In 2001 they had mostly succeeded in doing this, the last rebel zone being the shrinking area controlled by the Northern Alliance.

The Taliban too, have always been inward looking - they did not actively work towards a global caliphate. You are confusing them with their guests, the small grouping called Al Qeada, who were never more than a few dozen, albeit with the ear of Mullah Omar. The US did exactly the wrong thing in 2001 by attacking - it radicalised and dismembered the country and has cost god knows how many lives. That 40,000 dead quoted up-thread is an interesting figure. If it is an accurate number killed the obvious questions are a) are they all Taliban (given suspect US bodycounts in every war since WW2 - unlikely) and  b  ) since that is far more than the total number of troops or militia we know the Taliban had in 2001 and there is still a very large number of people actively confronting the US/NATO then something must've driven a lot of people to take up arms. It's not just some radical Islamic band versus the USA, the anti-coalition force is far, far broader than that.

And these people seem to be increasingly brazen and confident in their attacks. Shades of Saigon..... they know the US is beatable, it just takes time which they have without limit. It worked in Iraq too where the insurgents essentially won.

The Taliban did awful things in-country as a government and who knows if they would have evolved in a positive way, although in the large parts of the nation they still control they seem to have tempered their ways a little. One thing is certain though, the US coalition can never win this and Kazai will never be in any real sense the ruler of an Afghan nation.

In Topic: Problem Accessing Websites Via True

2011-10-24 08:05:12

I have the same issue. Sites that won't load include Thesaurus.com, Historyextra.com, the downloads part of bbcmagazinesbristol.com (the main site is fine) and bizarrely the CSS and graphics of Thai Visa (but only on some pages!) &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;There seems to be no logic to the blockage and nobody at true can tell me why.<br /><br />I've tried to two computers - same.

In Topic: After 15 Years In Thailand And Going Back To The Us

2011-01-07 13:57:21

View PostKRS1, on 2011-01-06 10:18:03, said:

I guess i should elaborate on my view point of the Thai vs American educational system.

A global survey just before Xmas put the US at 58th in the world at maths and around 50 in English! The thing about the US system that when it is good it is very good and when it's bad it's worse than any other (semi?) developed nation. The US has some of the best Universities on the planet but it also has a huge mass of uneducated and ignorant people who have dropped through the system.

If I was choosing an education system in 2011 I'd be looking at Australia, large parts of Europe, New Zealand, Singapore or Canada ahead of the US unless I knew my child was going to be going to one of the schools that wasn't keeping those numbers low. I'd chose each of those places for quality of life ahead of the US too.

In Topic: Wikileaks Blocked

2010-12-04 18:05:09

View PostSpee, on 2010-12-03 06:35:18, said:


Wikileaks is a plague that puts peoples' lives in jeopardy

Except there seems to be little evidence of that. And certainly not as many as the war in Iraq and the attacks by drones on civilians across the ME and West Asia seem to on a daily basis. The claim, made by a series of US politicians this week without any basis, seems a little hypocritical given the events of recent years. The Pentagon this week admitted there has been no personal harm from the previous releases by Wikileaks. They've been fairly careful to cover details that could endanger as have the various media partners.

I guess what really irks the US government too is the way Assange has turned into a hugely popular folk hero across much of the planet outside the US right now. I'm not reading or hearing much disapproval for what he's done beyond the US borders, quite the opposite - there seems to be massive media and public support.

The odd thing is that people seem to think that shutting down either the site or Assange is gonna put the genie back. It's done - there are 250,000 odd cables that will come out regardless.

In Topic: WikiLeaks website again offline after company cuts DNS service

2010-12-04 16:32:48

View Postcrgram, on 2010-12-04 10:29:45, said:

View PostWhiteCadillac, on 2010-12-03 19:07:57, said:

Once Wikileaks published material that has put peoples lives in to immediate danges (such as names of Afghan nationals who have given information to NATO) I stopped supporting them.

Agreed, once Julian Assange put his agenda above the the safety of other people he became as bad as the governments he is trying expose.

There is no evidence to support that at all. The leaks this year have all been fairly heavily censored to ensure that nobody has been endangered. As recently as this week even the Pentagon agreed that nobody had been hurt and there was no evidence of any reckless endangerment to date.

Unlike the poor villagers and schools in Pakistan that have suffered a Predator attack - and there have been more than a few.

Quick Navigation   View New Content Site search: