Jump to content
BANGKOK 16 January 2019 11:10

spambot

Advanced Members
  • Content Count

    553
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

232 Excellent

About spambot

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Perfect response elviajero - its good to get the black and white confirmation - Thank you for giving this - Appreciated.
  2. Thanks for the response on the clarification of this being an amendment rather than a new police order - The main value I would welcome is the clear confirmation that even though I can not see any other interpretation from what you say - I am assuming you are confirming that my figures are correct? For Jan 2020 extension: If 12 months x 35K foreign bank transfers occur = 420K. Does this mean that if (800K - 420K = ) 380K is seasoned for the last 3 months - Then this amount will satisfy the combination rule? Bottom line: If monthly outgoings are 35K and you transfer this amount from a foreign bank every month for normal needs - If you then just maintain a long term deposit of 380K then this is enough to satisfy retirement extension needs.
  3. While not explicitly mentioned in the new police order - Will the foreign bank transfer be an accepted replacement for the Income letter when used in the combination with appropriate Bank deposit and will this satisfy for a Retirement extension? For example for Jan 2020 extension: If 12 months x 35K foreign bank transfers occur = 420K. Does this mean that if (800K - 420K = ) 380K is seasoned for the last 3 months - Then this amount will satisfy the combination rule? Bottom line: If monthly outgoings are 35K and you transfer this amount from a foreign bank every month for normal needs - If you then just maintain a long term deposit of 380K then this is enough to satisfy retirement extension needs.
×