Jump to content
BANGKOK 12 December 2018 11:48

Catoni

Advanced Members
  • Content Count

    1,237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1,125 Excellent

About Catoni

  • Rank
    Super Member

Recent Profile Visitors

2,248 profile views
  1. Oh.... you like those COP conferences? All the elite politicians and celebrities flying in to exotic locations in the world and meeting their fleets of airconditioned limousines ready to take them to their five star luxury hotels. Their gravy train ! ! Going to their champagne and caviar banquets and laughing and slapping each other on the back... All the while talking about how us lower middle class taxpaying folks have to cut back OUR "elaborate" middle class working lifestyles...how us peons should not even be flying economy ..except maybe if they can hit us with big jumps in flight costs with Carbon Taxes added to the cost of our tickets for the fuel... (How's that working out in France lately?) Here's a COP video for you....... Exactly.... and that 0.8 degree increase (let's be generous and say 0.85) from 1880 - 2012 ...was following the ending of the L.I.A. which ended approx. 1850. The L.I.A. was a 550 year bad colder spell with longer, colder winters, shorter growing seasons, failed harvests... famine.... The Warming/Climate Change Alarmists want to return to that climate I guess...
  2. Yes Chomper Higgot..... that is exactly what your response is... tinfoil hat nonsense... Now... if you disagree with her..... try to intelligently rebut her and the video. Explain to us why her points are mistaken...tell us your evidence if you're able... (which I seriously doubt.) Bring a few cites and references.... Chomper Higgot.... if all you have is ad hominem and insults.... then you've got NOTHING ! !
  3. Ten years is certainly not a long enough data set to determine a climate trend.... You need at the very minimum..thirty years of data... and even that is really pushing it.. Climate changes........ sometimes fast.. sometimes slow.. sometimes a lot.. sometimes a little. The only think that shocks me is that some people are alarmed and terrified by the thought of Climate Change. It's as if they want it to stay at the climate we had on May 17, 1956 at 3:45 in the afternoon... and for it to stay like that and never change.
  4. Hmmmm..... even with all the cites and references in the videos...(just take a look.... full of references and cites and charts from the NOAA and NASA and the newspapers over the years... and quotes... . the Global Warming/Climate Change Alarmists keep their eyes shut tight and hope the facts disappear.... They are incapable of refuting and rebutting the evidence against Alarmism... They're going to hold tight to Al "We're Doomed" Gore and James "Fudgin' the Numbers" Hansen and Michael "Hockey Schtick" Mann So all they do is ad hominem attacks and throw crap at it and hope something sticks..
  5. Actually, I agree... Did you know we have only ten years left to save the planet?
  6. Folks here might find this interesting:
  7. Excellent video Krataiboy..... Explains it perfectly.... Thank you "Lies, Damned Lies, and Global Warming Statistics"
  8. Sorry to hear what happened to your passport. That's another good reason to ALWAYS keep your passport in a medium size Ziploc Storage Bag. It has a double seal... not just single seal.. Then I fold it and keep it in a front zippered pants pocket,..... my wallet in the other front pants pocket.. Both in Ziplock bags during Songkran. Three days totally soaked during Songkran.... my wallet and passport completely dry..... If in a pocket... it will give at least some protection if your pants go into a washing machine. Maybe even totally dry. Don't use cheaper... thinner... single zip bags. Use the Ziploc Storage or Freezer bag..... thicker and stronger than the Ziploc regular or sandwich bag. And the double zip is much better than the single zip on cheaper bags. I always put some Ziploc storage bags in my bag before going to the airport.
  9. I guess Marilyn Monroe figured that J.F.K was damn good in the sack and perhaps he paid her off better. But Jackie apparently was sure pissed according to some sources... but kept her mouth shut and pretended ignorance about her philandering President husband. What Trump did was actually small potatos compared to some former U.S. Presidents and Canadian Prime Ministers and other world leaders.. But it's always fun digging up dirt on world leaders when our side lost the election...no matter which country we live in.... But I did like and admire and respect His Royal Highness King Bhumibol Adulyadej of Thailand. I've got a beautiful heavy 90% silver 1971 ฿50 coin with King Bhumibol's image on it. COMMEMORATION OF 20th ANNIVERSARY OF THE WORLD FELLOWSHIP OF BUDDHISTS
  10. This is an interesting graph also....:
  11. Whatever happened to our good ‘ole Acapulco Gold weed and Blonde Lebanese hash from the late 1960’s and ‘70’s?
  12. Might be a good idea. Legalize it all and let adults have whatever drugs they like, and they will use a lot less drugs. Sounds like common sense and a good idea.
  13. They might even go further than that. The U.S. state of Oregon will be putting the question of legalizing Magic Mushrooms to the voters. Isn’t that wonderful ? What will be next? Maybe legalize regular cocaine? Crack would be too extreme. But regular powdered cocaine? Who knows?
  14. You posted: "Leave your xenophobic Jihadi crap at the border if you ever visit Canada. You have no clue." Nope... not xenophobic...Nothing wrong with calling pretty boy, daddy's millions, part time high school drama teacherJihadi Justin Trudeau what he is.. What else do you call a moron who rewards I.E.D. bomb builder and killer Islamic extremist Omar Kahder with $10.5 million of taxpayer dollars... and Trudeau never even called wife of the soldier he blinded in one eye.. and the widow and kids of the U.S. soldier he murdered to say "sorry"? What do you call a moron who goes to pray at not just regular Islamic mosques... but also extremist Wahabi mosques ? ? What do you call a Prime Minister who admires China's "basic dictatorship" ? I call him Jihadi Justin Trudeau... You can call him a "nice guy" if you like.. By the way...don't worry about me "visiting Canada".... I'm a born and bred taxpaying voting Canadian... I've got the right and freedom to call Trudeau anything I like... whether you like it or not. Trudeau at prayer:
  15. Quoting you: "The Earth emerged from the depths of the latest ice age over a period of 5000 years." No... you're wrong.... How could the Earth have emerged from the latest Ice Age when we are still in the latest Ice Age right now ? ? We are in the Quaternary/Pleistocene Glaciation..the Current Ice Age... which began about 2.6 million years ago. You're thinking about the last Glacial Period, from about 115,000 years ago, to about 11,700 years ago. (From the Eemian Interglacial to the end of the Younger Dryas.) You're confusing Glacial Periods and Ice Ages... You're wrong....But don't feel bad about that.... it's okay.... it's to be expected. That's an error which most people who have not done a study of Paleclimatology make. You posted: >"Right now temperatures are increasing 10 times as fast. And the rate of increase is accelerating. Scientists have repeatedly correlated what may seem to you like small temperature differentals that have had huge consequences for the climate. So naturally, why would anyone believe them and their mountains of data instead of you and your assertions of its insignificance? Once again, the rate of change is accelerating. " Uh.... again you're wrong..... Scientists acknowledge key errors in study of how fast the oceans are warming Keeling said the authors' miscalculations mean there is a much larger margin of error in the findings, which means researchers can weigh in with less certainty WASHINGTON POST Updated: November 14, 2018 Scientists behind a major study that claimed the Earth’s oceans are warming faster than previously thought now say their work contained inadvertent errors that made their conclusions seem more certain than they actually are. Two weeks after the high-profile study was published in the journal Nature, its authors have submitted corrections to the publication. The Scripps Institution of Oceanography, home to several of the researchers involved, also noted the problems in the scientists’ work and corrected a news release on its website, which previously had asserted that the study detailed how the Earth’s oceans “have absorbed 60 percent more heat than previously thought.” “Unfortunately, we made mistakes here,” said Ralph Keeling, a climate scientist at Scripps, who was a co-author of the study. “I think the main lesson is that you work as fast as you can to fix mistakes when you find them.” Read more here: https://vancouversun.com/news/canada/scientists-acknowledge-key-errors-in-study-of-how-fast-the-oceans-are-warming/wcm/b657fc38-c952-4280-b9a7-07903a86659e BBC Finally Admits Ocean Warming Study Had Huge Error Published on November 23, 2018 Written by John O'Sullivan The Biased Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), which bans any and all skeptical scientific analysis on global warming, has fallen into line with other fake news outlets to concede there are gross errors in a widely-hyped ‘ocean warming’ study. However, even now, the biased BBC cannot bring themselves to openly admit that the error was identified and brought to light by a global warming skeptic. BBC Environment correspondent, Matt McGrath, writes Errors have been found in a recent study suggesting the oceans were soaking up more heat than previously estimated. The initial report suggested that the seas have absorbed 60% more than previously thought. But a re-examination by a mathematician showed that the margin of error was larger than in the published study. The authors have acknowledged the problem and have submitted a correction to the journal. Read more here: https://principia-scientific.org/bbc-finally-admits-ocean-warming-study-had-huge-error/ >" It can't do what it pleases with its funders' money? Do you understand that the World Bank is a bank? Why do you >insist on blaming it for not acting like a charity? " Nothing to stop the Board of Directors and Shareholders from holding a vote to give a percentage of the profits to charity such as bringing clean water to villages to save the lives of dying children. Or is the World Bank at the edge of bankruptcy? I'm sure they are making money. After all... they had $200 BILLION to invest... right ? You wanna bet World Bank executives are not living like kings? >"... conspicuous billionaires who buy private jets or grandiose beach homes or live in gilded splendor in massive penthouses rather than contribute money to this cause?" Okay..... we'll start with Vice-President has been...Al Gore, and then Leonardo Di Caprio, the Canadian fruit fly Doctor David Suzuki... and to top it off... we'll go after George Soros..... How's that for a start ? ?
×