Jump to content
webfact

Ministry decision on Muslim students’ dress code seen as divisive

Recommended Posts

Ministry decision on Muslim students’ dress code seen as divisive

By CHULARAT SAENGPASSA 
THE NATION 

 

e44ab6a1f156382a93c47313621ba4e9.jpeg

File photo

 

CONCERNS ARE growing over the Education Ministry’s move to leave it up to the schools and their monastic landlords to decide on the dress code for Muslim students.

 

“I am extremely worried and concerned that this move will widen rifts,” Wisoot Binlateh, the director of Sheikul Islam’s coordination centre in the South, said yesterday.

 

Thailand’s deep South, which is mostly populated by Muslims, has struggled with insurgency-related unrest for more than a decade. 

 

The Education Ministry’s latest dress-code move is widely seen as a clear signal that Muslim children will not be able to protest if their schools force them to wear normal uniform – in effect making it impossible for them to follow religious dress rules of wearing hijabs and long trousers.

 

Last month, some parents challenged the Anuban Pattani School in Pattani province about what Muslim children studying there could wear. Operating inside a Buddhist temple, this school had long required students to wear school uniforms regardless of their religion. But the parents believed their children should be allowed to follow their Islamic beliefs. 

 

The Education Ministry back then intervened to ease tension, signalling that Muslim children should be able to wear a hijab and long trousers as long as their colours matched those of the school’s uniform. At that time, the ministry’s school-uniform regulation stipulated that students could dress in accordance with religious beliefs. 

 

But the Royal Gazette on Wednesday published the latest revision to the Education Ministry’s school-uniform rules.

 

The amendment stated that Muslim students can wear school uniforms or wear clothes based on their religious beliefs at schools that are not operating on plots belonging to temples. But if they study at schools which sit on monastic land they must comply with the dress code set by the school and the landlord. 

 

Thousands of state schools in Thailand are located inside monastic compounds. While the Education Ministry’s revision of the school-uniform rule aims to prevent further disputes over the dress code for Muslim students, the move itself has become a cause for concern.

 

“I really can’t understand why the government will do this: why revise the regulation?” Wisoot said. 

 

He said when Muslim children enrolled in private schools, the government was worried about insurgent ideologies. 

 

“So why does the ministry make a move that would drive Muslim children away?” he said. 

 

Wisoot emphasised that state schools should welcome diversity and foster harmony. 

 

“Children from various religious and cultural backgrounds should be allowed to interact at state schools and learn together,” he said.

 

“State schools should play a role in bringing children of various backgrounds together. If a dress code keeps some children away, they will not grow up in the state-organised inculcation system.”

 

National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) member Angkhana Neelapaijit said not allowing Muslim students to dress according to their religious beliefs is a violation of their religious freedom rights.

 

She was also worried that the dress code could cause divisions among people of different faiths. 

 

“The NHRC has received two complaints about school dress code, related to Anuban Pattani School and Hatyaiwittayalai School.

 

Some parents have even taken their children out of the latter school,” Angkhana said. She said the Hatyaiwittayalai School in fact allowed students to wear hijabs but some teachers were against it and this had caused problems. 

 

Cross Cultural Foundation director Pornpen Khongkachonkiet urged all sides to sit down together and talk. 

 

“Or else, there will be animosity on both sides – Buddhists and Muslims – in the area. Both sides are focusing on winning. But children deserve sympathy and they have got sandwiched between the two sides. This battle, if it goes on, will cause pain to all sides,” Pornpen said. 

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30347784

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-06-15

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Samui Bodoh said:

Why are "thousands of state schools...located inside monastic compounds"? 

historical

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, webfact said:

Wisoot emphasised that state schools should welcome diversity and foster harmony. 

 

Inshallah, one day this will happen.

 

 

  • Haha 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let the girls wear head gear as long as it is see through material. Boys need to be clean shaven. No exceptions

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Samui Bodoh said:

"...The amendment stated that Muslim students can wear school uniforms or wear clothes based on their religious beliefs at schools that are not operating on plots belonging to temples. But if they study at schools which sit on monastic land they must comply with the dress code set by the school and the landlord... 

...Thousands of state schools in Thailand are located inside monastic compounds..."

 

Hmm...

 

Why are "thousands of state schools...located inside monastic compounds"? Are they state schools or monastic schools?

 

If state schools are located in monastic compounds, does that mean that monastic law supersedes state law in regards to education in general? In the curriculum? In sporting activities? In the dress code? In operating hours?

 

Does monastic law supersede state law in all matters on monastic compounds or just education?

 

If the state pays rent for the land upon which their school resides (and presumably they do), do they not have the right to enact their own rules and regulations?

 

Double hmm...

 

I rent my house. Does this mean that my landlord can set a dress code for me?

 

Questions, questions...

 

 

The first free schools were the temple schools, originally they were monastic schools only for boys but the king ordered them to be available for all and  they evolved into the state school system, they worked together with the Abbots who have up land to build more schools.  Some old schools are within the temple grounds but actually most state primary schools are built on monastic land outside of the temple.  And they have to meet education law not monastic law, and have done for a hundred years.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Samui Bodoh said:

"...The amendment stated that Muslim students can wear school uniforms or wear clothes based on their religious beliefs at schools that are not operating on plots belonging to temples. But if they study at schools which sit on monastic land they must comply with the dress code set by the school and the landlord... 

...Thousands of state schools in Thailand are located inside monastic compounds..."

 

Hmm...

 

Why are "thousands of state schools...located inside monastic compounds"? Are they state schools or monastic schools?

 

If state schools are located in monastic compounds, does that mean that monastic law supersedes state law in regards to education in general? In the curriculum? In sporting activities? In the dress code? In operating hours?

 

Does monastic law supersede state law in all matters on monastic compounds or just education?

 

If the state pays rent for the land upon which their school resides (and presumably they do), do they not have the right to enact their own rules and regulations?

 

Double hmm...

 

I rent my house. Does this mean that my landlord can set a dress code for me?

 

Questions, questions...

 

 

The first free schools were the temple schools, originally they were monastic schools only for boys but the king ordered them to be available for all and  they evolved into the state school system, they worked together with the Abbots who have up land to build more schools.  Some old schools are within the temple grounds but actually most state primary schools are built on monastic land outside of the temple.  And they have to meet education law not monastic law, and have done for a hundred years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, holy cow cm said:

Let the girls wear head gear as long as it is see through material. Boys need to be clean shaven. No exceptions

 

Why do you want to be able to see the school girls hair?  What?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

BANGKOK 24 June 2018 15:53
Sponsors
×