Jump to content
rooster59

White House Counsel cooperates with Russia investigation - New York Times

Recommended Posts

White House Counsel cooperates with Russia investigation - New York Times

 

800x800 (3).jpg

FILE PHOTO: White House Counsel Don McGahn attends U.S. President Donald Trump's remarks about prescription drug prices at the White House in Washington, U.S. May 11, 2018. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House's top lawyer has cooperated extensively with the special counsel investigating Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election, sharing detailed accounts about the episodes at the heart of the inquiry into whether President Donald Trump obstructed justice, the New York Times reported on Saturday.

 

Citing a dozen current and former White House officials and others briefed on the matter, the newspaper said White House Counsel Donald McGahn had shared information, some of which the investigators would not have known about.

 

McGahn voluntarily cooperated with Mueller’s team as a regular witness, a person familiar with the matter told Reuters, as the White House asked many staffers to do. He was not subpoenaed nor did he speak to them under any kind of proffer or cooperation agreement.

 

The person also said he did not believe McGahn provided Mueller with incriminating information about Trump. McGahn provided the facts but nothing he saw or heard amounts to obstruction of justice by Trump, the person told Reuters.

 

According to the New York Times, McGahn in at least three voluntary interviews with investigators that totalled 30 hours over the past nine months, described Trump's furor toward the Russia investigation and the ways in which the president urged McGahn to respond to it.

 

The newspaper reported McGahn's motivation to speak with the special counsel as an unusual move that was in response to a decision by Trump's first team of lawyers to cooperate fully. But it said another motivation was McGahn's fear he could be placed in legal jeopardy because of decisions made in the White House that could be construed as obstruction of justice.

 

McGahn, the newspaper said, shared information on Trump's comments and actions during the firing of the F.B.I. director, James Comey, and the president's obsession with putting a loyalist in charge of the inquiry, including his repeated urging of Attorney General Jeff Sessions to claim oversight of it.

 

The newspaper said McGahn was also centrally involved in Trump's attempts to fire the special counsel, Robert Mueller, which investigators might not have discovered without him.

 

McGahn cautioned to investigators he never saw Trump go beyond his legal authorities.

 

A source close to the president told Reuters on Saturday the extent of McGahn's cooperation was “a tactical or strategic mistake” instigated by Trump’s first legal team and it should not have been allowed to happen because McGahn should have been covered by executive privilege. The person also said Trump is not worried because he does not feel he did anything wrong.

 

One lawyer familiar with the matter said McGahn could have been subpoenaed to testify to the grand jury if he did not cooperate with Mueller voluntarily and might have lost legal battles if he tried to invoke executive privilege.

 

William Burck, McGahn's personal lawyer, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

 

Trump's former personal lawyer, John Dowd, told Reuters on Saturday he was aware McGahn had spoken extensively with Mueller's team.

 

"Lot to cover," Dowd said in text message. "Did a great job. McGahn was a strong witness for the President according to Burck and debriefs of DM (Donald McGahn). Not aware of any of the alleged apprehensions manufactured by the NYT."

 

Dowd said a decision was made by the president's legal team for McGahn to cooperate with the investigation.

 

"I allowed White House Counsel Don McGahn, and all other requested members of the White House Staff, to fully cooperate with the Special Councel," Trump said in a tweet on Saturday, adding "In addition we readily gave over one million pages of documents. Most transparent in history. No Collusion, No Obstruction. Witch Hunt!"

 

Trump has repeatedly denounced the investigation into whether his campaign colluded with Moscow as a "witch hunt."

 

Rudy Giuliani, who joined the president’s outside legal team after Dowd resigned, told Reuters on Saturday that Trump’s lawyers had been in contact with McGahn's counsel after he was interviewed and possessed “emails that say he provided nothing that was damaging or incriminating to the president.”

 

Giuliani said McGahn's cooperation with Mueller was part of a legal strategy. As an officer of the court, he added, McGahn would have had to resign if he thought the president did anything illegal.

 

Giuliani said he did not believe McGahn was cooperating against the president, noting Trump's lawyers and McGahn's have a joint defence agreement that would have otherwise ended.

 

Former White House lawyer Ty Cobb, who resigned in May after joining the administration last summer to assist the president with the Russia probe, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

 

Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller, declined to comment.

 

 
reuters_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-08-19

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No point in participating further in these threads. I will just await the outcome.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, zaphod reborn said:

McGahn felt that Trump was going to pin the obstruction charge against him on McGahn (ala James Dean from Watergate).

 

Excellent point!  Thanks for the insight.  McGahn needs to be careful.  There's professional responsibility and constitutional issues to consider.   

 

I wonder if McGahn has read Dean's book (or books?) about Watergate.  Not the exact situation, but surely some lessons may be drawn from Dean's experiences as WH Counsel.  

 

Even better, I'd love to be the fly on the wall during a possible lunch between the two attorneys.  "You think Dick Nixon was a little strange, ...."

Edited by helpisgood
add parenthesis
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

John Dean has some good historical advise for the rats on this ship... :coffee1:

 

8146C613-10AE-4426-AA91-63172E95A6B9.jpeg

Edited by sfokevin
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mcgahn dident want to be the fall guy that’s why he is talking to muller just one more brick in the road.I do worry about trumps mental state he has nukes let’s hope we pass safely through this episode 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There he is ,gotcha again!Pesky little POTUS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Step by step. inch by inch- they are deserting Trump like rats from a sinking ship.  No one wants to be fall guy for Trump' possibly go to jail and ruin the rest of their lives.

 

There's more that will come out and we shall see what we shall see.  Let the truth emerge. If Trump is criminally liable- he will never see a minute in jail.  An impeachment maybe- and a definite pardon by Pence. At least now- Nixon won't be the worst President in History.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

BANGKOK 25 September 2018 23:57
Sponsors
×