Jump to content
BANGKOK 20 October 2018 06:02
rooster59

Accuser of Supreme Court nominee Kavanaugh agrees to testify to Senate committee

Recommended Posts

Accuser of Supreme Court nominee Kavanaugh agrees to testify to Senate committee

By Doina Chiacu and Richard Cowan

 

800x800 (4).jpg

FILE PHOTO: Supreme Court Justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh meets with Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH) at his office in the Russell Senate Office Building in Washington, U.S., July 11, 2018. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A woman who has accused U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault has agreed to testify before a Senate panel next week but details of her appearance have not been finalised, her lawyers said on Saturday.

 

U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley had set a Saturday afternoon deadline for Christine Blasey Ford, a California professor who has accused Kavanaugh of sexual assaulting her at a high school party 36 years ago, to decide whether and how she will testify.

 

"Dr. Ford accepts the committee's request to provide her first-hand knowledge of Brett Kavanaugh's sexual misconduct next week," Debra Katz and Lisa Banks, Ford's attorneys, said in a statement. "We are hopeful that we can reach agreement on details."

 

A White House official said it appeared that Ford's lawyers were trying to prolong negotiations.

 

"We look at this statement as a delay tactic," the official said. "The White House sees this as not an acceptance.

 

"Senate Republicans went from looking accommodating and generous to looking like they are getting played unless they see this as stalling and a delay tactic."

 

Senator Orrin Hatch, a member of the Republican-controlled Judiciary committee, also expressed scepticism.

 

"Worth noting that this is exactly where we were on Monday morning," he said on Twitter. "Without agreeing to a date, time, and terms we are no closer to hearing from Dr. Ford then we were when her lawyers said Dr. Ford was willing to testify during their media tour 6 days ago."

 

The committee had delayed a vote on Kavanaugh's confirmation after Ford's allegations emerged last week and her lawyers were negotiating with committee staff the conditions of her testimony.

 

Kavanaugh has denied the allegation and pledged to testify.

 

Confirming Kavanaugh's nomination would cement conservative control of the Supreme Court and advance a White House effort to tilt the American judiciary farther to the right.

 

Grassley had said earlier that the panel would vote on Kavanaugh's confirmation on Monday unless a deal was reached with Ford's lawyers by a Friday night deadline. Katz had said the deadline was "aggressive and artificial."

 

"Your cavalier treatment of a sexual assault survivor who has been doing her best to cooperate with the Committee is completely inappropriate," Katz added.

 

On Friday, President Donald Trump sought to cast doubt on Ford's allegation that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in 1982 when both were high school students in Maryland.

 

The judiciary committee has struggled with how to proceed with Kavanaugh's nomination. Democrats have demanded more time for scrutiny, and Republicans want to move ahead quickly with a confirmation vote in an increasingly volatile political climate ahead of congressional elections on Nov. 6.

 

TRUMP PRAISES 'FINE MAN'

 

Trump and the White House had been careful not to malign Ford after her allegations surfaced, but Trump dropped the restraint in his tweets on Friday.

 

"I have no doubt that, if the attack on Dr. Ford was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents," Trump said. "I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!

 

"Judge Brett Kavanaugh is a fine man, with an impeccable reputation, who is under assault by radical left wing politicians who don't want to know the answers, they just want to destroy and delay," Trump wrote.

 

Earlier, Trump had said Ford should be heard, even if it meant a delay in the confirmation process.

 

Republicans will be forced to walk a careful line in questioning Ford's account without alienating women voters ahead of the elections. Before the 2016 presidential election, more than a dozen women accused Trump of making unwanted advances.

 

The Senate Judiciary Committee released a letter it sent to Ford's attorneys on Friday in which it accepted some of their demands, including that Kavanaugh not be in the room when she testifies.

 

The panel rejected some of the other demands, including that Kavanaugh testify first, that the committee call additional witnesses that Ford requests, and that only senators be allowed to ask questions.

 

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, speaking at a gathering of evangelical voters in Washington, assured them Kavanaugh would be confirmed.

 

The Senate panel must approve Kavanaugh's confirmation before a vote by the full Senate, where Republicans hold a 51-49 majority. Kavanaugh's confirmation to the lifetime position would be the second of the Trump administration and solidify conservative control of the nation's top court.

 

Ford has received death threats while Kavanaugh and his wife also have received threats.

 

 
reuters_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-09-23

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Boon Mee said:

This whole sorry story reeks of nothing but a book deal. Attempting to sully the name of a fine man who has more integrity in his little finger than these people who have no ethics in their entire body. 

The man-child......integrity????

:cheesy::cheesy::cheesy::cheesy::cheesy::cheesy::cheesy:

Edited by Becker
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, scorecard said:

 

A fine man - 

 

 

 

F..**ked up.
I..nsecure
N..uerotic
E..motional.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

Attempting to sully the name of a fine man who has more integrity in his little finger than these people who have no ethics in their entire body. 

You just sullied Trump!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, rooster59 said:

"Judge Brett Kavanaugh is a fine man, with an impeccable reputation, who is under assault by radical left wing politicians who don't want to know the answers, they just want to destroy and delay,"

Remember Robert Porter who was forced to resign after two ex-wives accused him of domestic abuse?

“He also, as you probably know, says he’s innocent and I think you have to remember that. He said very strongly yesterday that he’s innocent so you have to talk to him about that, but we absolutely wish him well, he did a very good job when he was at the White House.” - Trump

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/feb/09/trump-defends-rob-porter-accused-of-domestic-abuse

The White House has become one big locker room and Trump is the coach.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, rooster59 said:

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, speaking at a gathering of evangelical voters in Washington, assured them Kavanaugh would be confirmed.

It's almost ironic that it seems the so called religious people with family values are the people who push forward and who couldn't care less what the new supreme court judge did in his past. I guess they think god will forgive them - or do they just don't care?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, RPCVguy said:

Such an unambiguous character reference. Wow. You obviously are unconcerned that his friend Mark Judge described their drunken behavior in a book "Wasted," or that while his accuser had voiced issues with him years ago, has asked for an FBI investigation (which they regularly do , regularly reopen background checks too) and has taken a lie detector test, Kavanaugh has been sheltered by the GOP senate majority and by Trump from having the FBI go back and reopen the background check. He has only submitted to judiciary committee (GOP) staffers questioning him about the incident. He'd have been smarter to say he had been a binge drinker in those years and could not affirm or deny the accusation - instead I expect he'll have added another count of lying under oath to the perjury list that will be used to impeach him - if the GOP persists in approving this flawed nomination.
    image.png.892db18bdaa488da95c7ae574d887261.png

Do you have a reliable source for this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Becker said:

The man-child......integrity????

:cheesy::cheesy::cheesy::cheesy::cheesy::cheesy::cheesy:

I think he meant the nominee for the supreme court of the usa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, scorecard said:

 

A fine man - that's a big statement. Are you in a position to make such a categorical statement?

 

 

Apparently such behaviour is just fine for some people.

These are are the people that want to make America great again  LOL

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sponsors
×