Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

johnrushton1982

Vfs Application Centre At Regent House Bangkok

51 posts in this topic

Just a quick word of warning when visiting the VFS UK visa application centre at regent house bangkok.

Make sure you go direct to VFS centre and not get reeled into the visa agent office next door. The staff there do their best to make you think they are part of VFS. They are NOT.

Basically on the second floor look for the white office with the UK flag and VFS a logo, there are usually 2 security guards outside.

Whatever you do, do not go into the offices with the glass fronted entrance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So what did these "nasty" next door people try to do to you?

They will try to take your money. I recently spoke with an applicant who went to Regent House to submit a settlement application. She had come back from a visit in the UK to do so, and her husband remained in UK. She had her complete application and the visa fee - 32,500 - with her. She was intercepted by someone from the office next door to VFS, and that person offered to check her documents. She was told that her application was incomplete, her 32, 500 baht was taken as a "deposit", and a further 50,000 was requested to assist in completing the application. The applicant was confused, naive, and whatever else you may think, and she now knows that. The point is, however, that she came out Regent House without submitting her application, and 32,500 baht poorer.

Please don't suggest that she can go back and insist on a refund, etc, etc. That will not happen. You actually have to see how this company operates, and accept that this is not the kind of company that is interested in customer service. Also, VFS and the Embassy are unable to do anything about this company. This has been the subject of many previous threads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another word of warning, we were approached by someone downstairs near the coffee counter, I can only presume it was one of them so they are operating downstairs as well as upstairs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i always buy the bank cheque from them and thats it. they never get my money except from the cheque i brough from them. :lol:

actually when it was my first time doing the process things myself they tried it on me too, but obviously they realized I can read and understand everything in my application. :jap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i always buy the bank cheque from them and thats it. they never get my money except from the cheque i brough from them. :lol:

actually when it was my first time doing the process things myself they tried it on me too, but obviously they realized I can read and understand everything in my application. :jap:

Next time, don't even give them your cheque business. There's Siam City Bank immediately inside the main entrance, ground floor, right hand side as you come in. They even have the list of visa fees printed and laminated on the counter top. How much 'commission' did the visa shop charge to send someone downstairs to the bank for your cheque?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i always buy the bank cheque from them and thats it. they never get my money except from the cheque i brough from them. :lol:

actually when it was my first time doing the process things myself they tried it on me too, but obviously they realized I can read and understand everything in my application. :jap:

Next time, don't even give them your cheque business. There's Siam City Bank immediately inside the main entrance, ground floor, right hand side as you come in. They even have the list of visa fees printed and laminated on the counter top. How much 'commission' did the visa shop charge to send someone downstairs to the bank for your cheque?

well i only paid on how much the fee is for visa . they already have it print out too. didnt have to wait or anything at all.

anyway i will go to the bank myself than next time . to make ppl happy. hahahaha :jap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As said, this has been the subject of many threads in the past.

The embassy say "the VFS UK visa application centre at Regent House is clearly signposted, and VFS staff are clearly identifiable by their uniform." No signs, no uniform means that you are in the wrong office.

VFS staff do not 'meet and greet' people entering the building; anyone who does so and tries to persuade you into their office is not VFS staff.

VFS staff will never offer advice on an application; except to say that it is incomplete and suggest that you go away and come back with the missing parts/documents. Even then they must accept it and forward it to the embassy if the applicant insists.

Any advice VFS staff do give will be free of charge. The only charges they make, over and above the visa application fee, are for ancillary services such as photocopying, photographs etc. (see Additional Services).

Anyone who says that the application has problems which they can fix for a fee is not VFS staff. (If they are VFS staff, then they are breaking the terms of VFS' contract with the UKBA and their own terms of employment and should be reported to both the VFS management and the embassy immediately.)

Unfortunately there seems little the embassy can do about the agency. They have no control over who the owners of Regent's House lease office space to and moving to other premises would only mean the predatory 'agents' would follow.

Just make sure that anyone you know who is applying for a UK visa is aware of these people and that they should be ignored.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately there seems little the embassy can do about the agency.

I do think they could do a better job of warning people though. How things are set up, it's all too easy for people to get hood-winked. The embassy must be aware of this, and should do more to try and stop it, rather than simply accepting it with the attitude of "well if people are silly enough to be fooled, what can we do?"

Do more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The embassy website says

....VFS and its staff cannot give you advice on how to complete your application, or what type of visa you should apply for........

.......Your visa application will be processed and decided by UK Border Agency staff. VFS provide a visa application support service only, and VFS staff play no part in the outcome of your visa application. The decision to issue or refuse a visa is made by the UK Border Agency only.........

..........There are a number of visa agents operating in Thailand and within the Regent House building. Prospective applicants may choose to use a visa agent in order to support or prepare their application, but any decision to utilise the service of an agent is entirely at the discretion of the applicant.

Please note: Visa agents are in no way whatsoever connected to the Embassy, and have no influence over the outcome of an application. The VFS UK visa application centre at Regent House is clearly signposted, and VFS staff are clearly identifiable by their uniform......

This information is also available in Thai, but for some reason the link to the Thai pages of the embassy website seems to be broken at present.

Similar advice is on the UKVAC website, in English and in Thai.

Putting warning signs up in Regents House would almost certainly be against Thailand's strict libel laws, and probably wouldn't be acceptable to the landlord anyway.

So what 'more' do you suggest they do?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Putting warning signs up in Regents House would almost certainly be against Thailand's strict libel laws, and probably wouldn't be acceptable to the landlord anyway.

So what 'more' do you suggest they do?

I'm not sure why you think that putting up warning signs would break any laws - it's not as if the signs would have to point any fingers or name names. Just raise applicants awareness to underhand tactics that go on.

I think the blind eye that VFS more or less takes has more to do with what you mention about issues with the landlord. Pretty sad, if true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both VFS and the embassy have the information posted above on their websites.

I've never been to Regents House, but the majority of those that have and have expressed an opinion in previous threads here say that the VAC is pretty well signed; my sister-in-law managed to find it on her own a couple of years ago.

So how is that turning a blind eye?

As for warning signs not breaking any defamation laws, I'm no Thai legal expert and stand to be corrected on the following by someone with more knowledge than I.

I understand that even the slightest implication that an agent operating in Regents House was using underhand tactics would place whoever placed those signs, whether it be VFS or the embassy, open to an action for defamation by any agent who operated in Regents House. The landlord could also be sued for allowing the signs to be placed.

Proving what was published is true is no defence in Thai defamation cases if the statement adversely affects the financial or business interests of the plaintiff.

The defence that the signs were in the public interest might work; but I'm sure that neither VFS, the embassy or the landlord would want to be tied up in a lengthy and expensive court action to find out.

See Defamation and Thai law and Criminal defamation of character: the Thai regime (both published by Tilleke & Gibbins)

So, again, what 'more' do you suggest VFS and the embassy do?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both VFS and the embassy have the information posted above on their websites.

I've never been to Regents House, but the majority of those that have and have expressed an opinion in previous threads here say that the VAC is pretty well signed; my sister-in-law managed to find it on her own a couple of years ago.

So how is that turning a blind eye?

As for warning signs not breaking any defamation laws, I'm no Thai legal expert and stand to be corrected on the following by someone with more knowledge than I.

I understand that even the slightest implication that an agent operating in Regents House was using underhand tactics would place whoever placed those signs, whether it be VFS or the embassy, open to an action for defamation by any agent who operated in Regents House. The landlord could also be sued for allowing the signs to be placed.

Proving what was published is true is no defence in Thai defamation cases if the statement adversely affects the financial or business interests of the plaintiff.

The defence that the signs were in the public interest might work; but I'm sure that neither VFS, the embassy or the landlord would want to be tied up in a lengthy and expensive court action to find out.

See Defamation and Thai law and Criminal defamation of character: the Thai regime (both published by Tilleke & Gibbins)

So, again, what 'more' do you suggest VFS and the embassy do?

I have been to Regent's House a number of times and i have to say that the whole set up there is very confusing, with the unscrupulous agent and the VFS office being pretty much together and looking like one and the same thing, and with the staff of said agent who do a good job of presenting themselves in a manner that one could confuse for being a part of the VFS operation.

I am no legal expert, but i really can't fathom why general warning signs would be a problem. If they would be, surely the same would apply for the warnings you mention on their website. What is the difference between telling people at the location by way of signs, and telling people on the website, besides the fact that it would help a lot more people avoid being conned?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This has been a topic of conversation for years . the point is why has the VFS not had it closed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

BANGKOK 24 July 2017 19:45
Sponsors