Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

webfact

The rice mountain: Thai govt sticks to its worst and most costly policy

Recommended Posts

Thailand's economy
The rice mountain

An increasingly unpopular government sticks to its worst and most costly policy

BANGKOK: -- IT HAS not been a happy second anniversary for the government of Yingluck Shinawatra. Thousands of diehard opponents of her elder brother Thaksin Shinawatra, himself a former prime minister, took to the streets of Bangkok on August 7th to protest against a bill that could grant Mr Thaksin an amnesty for past offences and open up the possibility of his return from exile.

Probably Ms Yingluck is used by now to these kinds of protests, along with the usual rumours of coups. More worrying, perhaps, is widespread and growing dismay over her government’s economic performance, supposedly its strong suit.

This week an opinion poll carried out by Bangkok University found that the government’s approval rating has fallen to its lowest level yet. Most damaging to its reputation is its flagship scheme to subsidise rice. This was the brainchild of Mr Thaksin, who dictates most of his sister’s policies from afar. It was a useful vote-winner during the election campaign in 2011. But its costs now jeopardise both the government’s finances and the economy as a whole.

The rice subsidy was classic Thaksin populism. Two-fifths of Thais work in agriculture, most of them as rice farmers. Ms Yingluck promised that, if she were elected, her government would buy unmilled rice directly from farmers at about twice the market rate, or 15,000 baht (about $500) per tonne. This would put money into poor farmers’ pockets and stimulate domestic demand. Naysayers warned that the scheme would be impossibly expensive.

Full story: http://www.economist.com/news/asia/21583281-increasingly-unpopular-government-sticks-its-worst-and-most-costly-policy-rice-mountain

-- The Economist 2013-08-09

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the link comes this pinpoint assessment of the rice pledging scheme by The Economist:

It is a fiasco.



Well done Thaksin and company. bah.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the link comes this pinpoint assessment of the rice pledging scheme by The Economist:

It is a fiasco.

Well done Thaksin and company. bah.gif

"Eternal Brother calling Agent Thaksin. Mission accomplished. Return to base."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm fascinated by the long-term implications of this policy. International buyers are just biding their time, waiting for the grand Thai-rice fire sale. There's no way Thailand will ever regain it's position as the world's top rice exporter. It's reputation for supplying high-quality jasmine rice has already gone if people are suspicious that old or foreign-sourced grain has been mixed in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Meanwhile, daily revelations of incompetence and corruption surrounding the rice scheme take their toll on the government’s standing, and investors fret about the wider effect on the public finances. Government debt levels are rising, and Moody’s, a ratings agency, has warned of the risk that the rice scheme poses to the country’s fiscal discipline.

All part of the plan, after Thaksin returns he will blame the whole mess on Yingluck and take over to save the country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm fascinated by the long-term implications of this policy. International buyers are just biding their time, waiting for the grand Thai-rice fire sale. There's no way Thailand will ever regain it's position as the world's top rice exporter. It's reputation for supplying high-quality jasmine rice has already gone if people are suspicious that old or foreign-sourced grain has been mixed in.

It's getting to a point of being unsellable because people now know that future crops will be subsidised less, and thus cheaper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rice Pledging Scam to help poor farmers, in the BP recently a piece says that the scam actually only helps rich farmers as the ones needing help do not qualify to participate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Along with its dismal failure to raise the income of farmers (but landlords are doing very nicely TYVM) is the lingering stench of corruption. As the loss rapidly approaches a trillion baht with SFA to show for it, I await Yingluk explaining why Thailand so badly needs to borrow 2 trillion for infrastructure development, a loan expected to take 50 years to repay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm fascinated by the long-term implications of this policy. International buyers are just biding their time, waiting for the grand Thai-rice fire sale. There's no way Thailand will ever regain it's position as the world's top rice exporter. It's reputation for supplying high-quality jasmine rice has already gone if people are suspicious that old or foreign-sourced grain has been mixed in.

But are they really waiting? If so, it may be a long wait. In addition to low quality, dirty, spoiled produce, Thailand cannot be seen to dump rice below international market prices. It has a legal obligation to ASEAN, the WTO and the United Nations. No easy way out that I can see. And still there are some people who insist that Thaksin has vision - how very shortsighted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the rice plan made some people very very rich. PTP, Yingluck, Thaksin, all in it for themselves and to hell with everyone else and the country. It is how Thaksin has always operated and always will. If T actually gets back here and in power he'll strip the country down so far that Angola will start looking good. Greedy family that uses and abuses their power and privilege at every chance they can get.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rice Pledging Scam to help poor farmers, in the BP recently a piece says that the scam actually only helps rich farmers as the ones needing help do not qualify to participate

Most farmers do qualify for the scheme but get nowhere near the 15k bht per tonne.

The guy who rents some of my wifes paddy got 13k last crop and 12.5k for the crop before that.

With the increase in labour and fertiliser costs he says he is only getting as much as he did before the scheme was introduced.

Taking into account inflation he is actually worse off.

Sent from my GT-I9003 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Along with its dismal failure to raise the income of farmers (but landlords are doing very nicely TYVM) is the lingering stench of corruption. As the loss rapidly approaches a trillion baht with SFA to show for it, I await Yingluk explaining why Thailand so badly needs to borrow 2 trillion for infrastructure development, a loan expected to take 50 years to repay.

2.2 trillion Baht will cover all the bad policy decisions and corrupt practices for the next ten years. After that, why should they care. Dr. Thaksin will be an old man, all his family and friends will be supremely rich in a bankrupt country where their ill-gotten gains will spend better than ever. Truly evil to spend the country's future on current corruption.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why dont they turn it into wine? Very popular in Europe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why dont they turn it into wine? Very popular in Europe.

Why not indeed, the Austrians once put anti-freeze in their wine so what could the Thais do with rotting rice ?

Chateau Cardboard could take on a whole new meaning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

BANGKOK 23 January 2018 01:23
Sponsors
×