webfact

Trump calls special counsel Russia probe 'greatest witch hunt' in U.S. history

154 posts in this topic

18 minutes ago, Crowes said:

 

The difference being the cold hard evidence that Hillary did indeed break the law, regardless of her "intent". Trumps allegations are all hearsay by the liberal media who can't accept their candidate lost.

I'm not sure which, if any, candidate the Wall Street Journal backed, but few people consider it 'liberal media'.  It too has been reporting on Trump's fiascos, relying anonymous White House sources just like every other news organization eager to gather news of importance.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Crowes said:

regardless of her "intent"

No, not regardless of her intent. There has to be intent for criminal conviction in HRC's case. Such as - Did HRC "deliberately" store the emails on a private server with the "intent" that they could be stolen by unauthorized persons?

 

The FBI determined that she was "careless" in her handling of the subject emails but had no intent for unauthorized disclosure of classified information. The data was stored in a manner that made it potentially vulnerable to third party hacking. Hence - careless handling. Furthermore, disclosure of any of the subject emails to her staff was not a crime as her staff had the appropriate classified clearances.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A off topic post meant to derail the topic has been removed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Smoke.

More smoke.

Smoke BIGLY.

 

The trump regime is really in trouble.  This is getting much closer to Mr. Big and it ain't going away.

 

Let's get to the bottom of this. OK?

 

Quote

 

Brennan’s explosive testimony just made it harder for the GOP to protect Trump

...

Indeed, in one of the most important moments, Brennan’s testimony ended up making it very clear that there was a sufficient intelligence basis for the FBI to conduct an investigation into whether those “contacts and interactions” amounted to collusion.

The result of this was that, by trying to get Brennan to say there was no collusion, Republicans made it overwhelmingly obvious that they are trying to undermine the investigation, or at least erode public confidence in it — as is Trump.

 

 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2017/05/23/brennans-explosive-testimony-just-made-it-harder-for-the-gop-to-protect-trump

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

he's not just a nut job.....

  he's not just poorly educated....

    he's a witch. hee heeee!!!!!
 

he always seemed quite effeminate.... with his 'manly talk'..... 

 

 

the only one he ever ****seems*** to get mixed up on is the 'winners and losers' theme... he calls everyone a loser yet somehow he 'won' the US election....

 

 

or did he? that's what this one is all about eh?
 

Edited by maewang99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, maewang99 said:

I agree once again with Trump.

he's not just a showboater....

he's not just a nut job.....

he's not just poorly educated....

he's a witch. 

 

he always seemed quite effeminate.... with his 'manly talk' a cover..... 

 

 

the only one he ever gets mixed up on is the 'winners and losers' theme... he calls everyone a loser yet somehow he 'won' the US election.... or did he?

and that's what this one is all about, eh?

 

 

Well no. Even if all the accusations are true the election result stands. What this one is actually about is not Russian interference in the Presidential election, it is about whether the Trump team colluded with a foreign power. It may extend to interference (covering-up) with the subsequent inquiries. In the event of Trump losing his position, Pence would take over. But the election result still stands.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish Trump would get his stories straight. He tells us that he was told on three occasions that he is not under investigation, then claims there is a witch hunt against him.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, alanrchase said:

I wish Trump would get his stories straight. He tells us that he was told on three occasions that he is not under investigation, then claims there is a witch hunt against him.

That story is straight. He can still claim that the head of the FBI told him that he wasn't under investigation and that therefore any accusations are an orchestrated witch-hunt precisely because he wasn't under investigation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump just admitted.... in front of television cameras... live....
that he did disclose classified info... 

 

'I didn't say Israel not even once... I didn't.
  I didn't.  not even once.

   not even one time in my meeting.....'

  

[ with the Russians ]
 

he can't even think far enough ahead of his little puny mouth to know what he says obviously implies?????


or the b.s. is so thick that he just sees it as b.s. on top of b.s. and that it therefore doesn't imply anything because it's all b.s.????

is it now that bad?

  did OBL win... in the end that we have gotten to this level?

   and we are broke according to accrual accounting.

    but we use cash.... that everyone allows us to just conjure up.

      for how long ????? with a POTUS like this on top of it all?






 

Edited by maewang99
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That story is straight. He can still claim that the head of the FBI told him that he wasn't under investigation and that therefore any accusations are an orchestrated witch-hunt precisely because he wasn't under investigation.


I accept your point but he seems to be suggesting the witch hunt is being carried out by people who are supposedly not investigating him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brennan: Russia may have successfully recruited Trump campaign aides

The former CIA director also says the FBI probe into whether Russia meddled in the election is ‘well founded.’ (sub-title)

 

"Former CIA Director John Brennan said on Tuesday that he had concerns that Russian officials may have successfully recruited aides from Donald Trump’s campaign to help in the Kremlin’s efforts to influence last year’s presidential election."

 

"I encountered and am aware of information and intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between Russian officials and U.S. persons involved in the Trump campaign that I was concerned about because of known Russian efforts to suborn such individuals," he told lawmakers."

 

"He said he believed the FBI’s investigation into possible coordination between the Trump campaign and Moscow is “certainly well founded and needed to look into these issues.”

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/23/brennan-russia-tried-to-recruit-us-persons-to-influence-presidential-campaign-238719

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

BANGKOK 27 May 2017 11:22
Sponsors